Is SimpleX more secure because it has no ID?

Then why did SimpleX Chat previously only have 1-time invitation links, and now it has added the SimpleX contact address?

What exactly is the SimpleX contact address?

Does it count as an ID? Or does it not?

If Keychat named its features like SimpleX Chat, it would look like this?👇

https://simplex.chat/docs/guide/making-connections.html#comparison-of-1-time-invitation-links-and-simplex-contact-addresses nostr:note1ucp7v2226d6kgqllq6pxuff89tzrcmr9x7xf0hyrhdzgjzy92nwqch80r2

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The difference between two is that keychat has identity and simplex doesn’t! Don’t be retard ! You can track a footprint on keychat!

How to track a footprint?

Public key analytics, relays

P.S. also nsec can be generated on malicious website and it’s again 🚩

Stop pretending that you built killer privacy app! Put a fat bounty to trace the shit you built and maybe someone can tell you the flows 😏

You just need to explain how “Public key analytics, relays” work.

If you can’t, stop pretending that you understand.

Put few coins so someone will be interested to take it and release the flows

I don't remember if I've already asked this, but are there any plans to integrate #amber ?

I don’t recall if I’ve been asked this question before.

The "Amber" you mentioned is likely referring to NIP-46 Nostr Remote Signing, right? We are very likely to support NIP-46.

NIP-46 requires a relay to facilitate signature requests and signatures between a third-party app and a signer app, even if both apps are on the same phone. Therefore, we feel that NIP-46 is not entirely perfect. Perhaps for this reason, NIP-55 Android Signer Application emerged.

In this approach, signature requests and signatures between a third-party app and a signer app (NIP-55) on the same Android phone are handled through internal system communication, without the need for a relay. This solution is better suited for most scenarios. However, iOS does not support NIP-55.

There’s no perfect solution yet, and we are still contemplating.

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/46.md#nostr-remote-signing

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/55.md

Yes, I'm referring to [amber](https://github.com/greenart7c3/amber) which, according to that link, is a NIP-46 implementation, but my understandig is that it does what you're describing as a NIP-55 implementation. Perhaps nostr:nprofile1qqs827g8dkd07zjvlhh60csytujgd3l9mz7x807xk3fewge7rwlukxgpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhszrnhwden5te0dehhxtnvdakz7auvdel could chime in here?