Chris is likely referring to my Citrea investment, which I've explained numerous times that Citrea doesn't need larger OP_RETURN to operate their protocol.
Kind of a ridiculous question... I mean, if a developer truly believes that a certain pattern of SW development is "better for Bitcoin", and like most other Bitcoin Devs one has invested significantly in Bitcoin, than of course changes that improve Bitcoin as a SW project will "financially benefit" the developers. That's the point.
Are you implying some other form of (Fiat) monetary benefit to nostr:npub17u5dneh8qjp43ecfxr6u5e9sjamsmxyuekrg2nlxrrk6nj9rsyrqywt4tp outside of the context of Bitcoin's (Fiat) price rising?
Discussion
Thank you for the response, I’m going to push back a bit, you say that Citrea doesn’t “need” larger OP_RETURN. My question is more along the lines of does Citrea benefit from larger OP_RETURN?. To be clear, my intent is not to attack your character, but allow you to respond directly as this is a common criticism I hear. I see a lot of people talking past eachother on this issue . Then devolving into personal attacks and emotional appeals.
The answer you’re looking for is yes.
I’m less looking for an answer and more wanting an honest dialogue to occur. We may be past that though. Personally It doesn’t bother me if a person advocates for something that benefits them financially. It is certainly relevant to a debate though.
You won’t get an honest answer from him. Gaslighting and out of context half truths at best.
I haven't done the math in a while, but the answer is that the benefit is so marginal that it is effectively zero.
First off, we're talking about 160 bytes of data.
Secondly, it's only used if a specific dispute resolution process gets triggered. And the incentives are in place to make sure the validators try their best to prevent it from triggering. So it's expected to happen extremely rare, possibly never.
Chatgbt and grok both disagree with this statement.
So why don’t you just stfu about it if you don’t care people run knots?
(Spoiler: he cares a lot.)
The question is why?
(Spoiler: incentive)
🧡👊🏻🍻
🤙🧡
LLMs are retarded.
Here is post form sh who:
1. Is knots proponent
2. Knows what he is talking about (knowledgeable in bitvm)
🤘😂
🤣🤜
🗣️💨✨
🤙🧡
What a disgusting liar. Citrea started this shit with Antoine because they needed OP_RETURN bigger than 83 Bytes.
Great! We don’t need it either! 🙂