Replying to Avatar Hanshan

its a very obvious.

maybe try refuting the argument...?

or AT LEAST try to say why it doesnt matter that the movement of utxos are publicly recorded and cash bills aren't.
Avatar
BitcoinIsFuture 1d ago 💬 1

You are making up your own clown theory and its ridiculous.

You just said that dollar bills are not fungible money which every definition gives as example of fungible money.

You are just writing ridiculous BS.

Per your own clown definition of fungible money it seems only Monero must be fungible, although we have seen traceability on Monero.

I have already said countless times that no one can stop anyone accepting Bitcoin because Bitcoin is decentralized peer-to-peer Freedom Money and 1 Bitcoin = 1 Bitcoin.

Bitcoin is fungible money. And your BS argument about tainting is refuted via coinjoins and #Lightning. Thats it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Hanshan 1d ago 💬 1

cool 👍

obviously we've reached the end of your critical thinking abilities.

Avatar
Hanshan 1d ago

but for the discerning reader,

the whole argument boils down to whether or not UTXOs of the same value are accepted *in practice* as fungible (like bills).

or whether they are seen as different because of their history.

we have plenty of examples of the history of specific UTXOs being 1 known and 2 compromising their value perception

we don't have so many examples of the value of cash being compromised because of its history. except in cop dramas where they paint the bank money with ultraviolet ink and shit.

so, the fungibility of UTXOs is much easier to compromise. it takes very little effort for a peer (or any interested party) to discern between UTXOs of the same value.

but it is SO extremely difficult to discern between cash bills of the same value that basically nobody does it except for law enforcement in specific situations.