Bitcoin Core Hitting New Lows
https://blossom.primal.net/9901c5c81e3b1d81437da514ab946aa3888a621dea18ca0fbfc46abb8b87c283.mp4
Discussion
I tried zapping you but it's returning errors
As I've said many times, Citrea really seems like a shady coverup of the whole thing.
Why can Alpen Labs fit everything in just under 80 bytes?
https://docs.alpenlabs.io/how-alpen-works/bitcoin-bridge
If Citrea sucks as a layer 2 it's its team that should find a better way of doing things instead of Bitcoin Core changing long standing, non controversial policy.
I was listening to a Jim Rohn video this morning and he was talking about defending your values.
We value Bitcoin as Money not as an Image file distribution system.
Anyway... run Bitcoin Knots!
I cannot believe these these cOrE v30 proponents are engaging in this horrible slander!
Lopps shitcoining ways. Go back to eth loser
This PR, replacing #32359, doesn’t remove the -datacarrier or -datacarriersize options. Contrary to what many are saying, the PR does not force the user to accept larger datacarrier transactions in transaction relay. Setting -datacarrier=0 still turns it off, and -datacarriersize=83 gives you the original default (the same amount of data but across 1 or more outputs).
Some developers still believe the option should be removed, but there is consensus for waiting at least 1 release like we did for -mempoolfullrbf. No timeline is set for removal.
People need to open their eyes. Truth matters.
Love your videos! ❤️
If interested , highly recommend
Keep study and stack sats 🇮🇹🔥
nostr:npub1s33sw6y2p8kpz2t8avz5feu2n6yvfr6swykrnm2frletd7spnt5qew252p