Aaron Siri: The study compared children enrolled at Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward — unvaccinated children versus those who received one or more vaccines....Vaccinated children had 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease, 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, including 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder.”

“ADHD: 262 cases in the vaccinated group. Zero in the unvaccinated group. All of these findings were statistically significant. After 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health issue — often multiple, only 17% of unvaccinated children did. Had it found vaccinated kids were healthier, it would have been published immediately. Because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer. The findings didn’t fit the policy that vaccines are safe.”

https://blossom.primal.net/209079be93014f5dca0f351228bf28b557492749c486d74887138cea70ecd475.mp4

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

... and the public hangings are scheduled for when?

That’s for the public to decide, as of now everything seems calm like this hearing didn’t just happen

can protestors from nepal be hired to make it happen? 🙃

Hahaha!! Those dudes know how to vigilante justice but I hope it doesn’t get hijacked by Soros and his people

Sounds even better

Holy fuck.

This is just a tip of the iceberg

Where are the arrests?!

No arrests dude, most don’t even know there is a problema

haha I wish

If arrests don’t come, can we even still be talking about the rule of law?!

Unfortunately there is no rule of law for them.

Where’s the link to the actual study?

The Henry Ford study wasn’t buried because it was inaccurate or flawed, it was buried because it contradicts the pledge of allegiance to the vaccine cult; “Vaccines are one of the greatest breakthroughs of the 20th century that have saved millions of lives from diseases such as polio, smallpox and measles. While side-effects can be experienced by some people, they are very rare. Vaccines are safe and effective. Vaccines save lives”.

nostr:nevent1qqsvdpv395stcv23n2fz92dfrp3kjd9xey4w5qdqta6uvku6a2kcgdspramhxue69uhkummnw3ezuetfde6kuer6wasku7nfvuh8xurpvdjsw3hmgr

Hearings to examine how the corruption of science has impacted public perception and policies regarding vaccines. 09/09/2025

https://www.congress.gov/event/119th-congress/senate-event/337382?s=1&r=13

The whole thing is worth the listen. They even talk about how raw clinical trial data is not available to peer reviewers. That explicitly is anti-science. Being able to re-create study outcomes is the very point of science and the scientific method.

nostr:nevent1qqsvdpv395stcv23n2fz92dfrp3kjd9xey4w5qdqta6uvku6a2kcgdspramhxue69uhkummnw3ezuetfde6kuer6wasku7nfvuh8xurpvdjsw3hmgr

the dog that didn't bark... we'll see, but news travels fast these days, and not one major US news outlet is covering this story today... if the conclusions were the opposite, the media would be howling from the rooftops that the "anti-vaxxers" are putting their children's lives at risk.

regardless of your take on vaccines, the implications of this information is huge and would be of great interest to the american people.

The msm are experts at distraction and brainwashing people to believe their propaganda. Given the current news cycle, it would be in their best interests to memory hole this hearing. It’s up to us to spread the word

An important study like that should be easy to find, got the link to that handy?

Thanks! On first reading it seems pretty legit - I’ve got to knock the cobwebs off my statistics vocabulary to make sure I’m understanding it accurately, but definitely can’t just hand wave that paper away….

Absolutely and the sample size was also statistically significant and over a long enough time frame. What’s even more interesting is that the docs were pro vaxx but when they did an objective study it came out the exact opposite of what they were hoping to find.

I’ve had a lot of physiology and pathophysiology courses over the years and anyone that says they understand it all is full of shit. If the study is done in good faith and the methods are solid, ya have to take it seriously.

At the end of the day, it warrants thorough objective analysis and scrutiny esp of the study design. At the very least it’s a signal that something is awry with jabs

Are there folks replicating the study you know of with different populations now to see if this was an anomaly or not?

To my knowledge, no. This study wasn’t even published in journals because the doctors who did it were afraid of being cancelled so they sat on it since 2020 when they completed it, until now.