Interesting to see that #Bitcoin has become so mainstream that Hoover Institution makes an episode about it
Follow Rasmussen on Rumble!
Perfection 😅🤩 nostr:note1vang5sr8wyd2wcwfk0w6xmjf6hp986auk4rujz3ynvnc9ks9mpmqfe3thj
You’re going into the lion’s den. Be careful. (And fuck’em, WEF et al
”When you want to ban/disappear/unperson/decareer anyone who disagrees with your view are you:
A: A 'climate scientist'?
B: A member of a cult?”
Latimer Alder on X
well I think that AI can replace parts of the more robotic shores humans must execute right now, or maybe most, If not all of them. But there is ONE thing it cannot, EVER, do…to become human. AI should serve as our slave. And I mean it in a litteral sense.
🤣 nostr:note1dlup74pq483jrp4qgzl7ljtlrvsjgtud5plqzzxqx40343tfqalsq905gd
This is me. I’m for everything that is good and ABSOLUTELY against everything that is bad. 
I asked GPT what this means, and the answer was:
The statement seems to be a riddle or a puzzle. Let's break it down:
"6x24" likely refers to multiplying 6 by 24, resulting in 144.
"12x12" similarly likely refers to multiplying 12 by 12, also resulting in 144.
So, "add zero to those" would mean adding zero to 144, which still results in 144.
The phrase "and you see a number named in a special book" could be referring to a significant number mentioned in a special book, possibly a religious text or a book of mathematical significance.
Then, it mentions that "bitcoin's daily block count is this number as well," implying that the number 144 is somehow related to the daily block count of the Bitcoin blockchain.
In summary, the statement suggests that the number 144 is significant in both a special book and in the context of Bitcoin's daily block count. It's an intriguing connection between seemingly unrelated concepts.
