Avatar
ish4k
052466631c6c0aed84171f83ef3c95cb81848d4dcdc1d1ee9dfdf75b850c1cb4
neither left nor right. down. underground. brazilian writer and independent journalist. [former rollingstone lemonde ims jornaldobr] [id_proof] https://sutor.substack.com/about [\] bigotstalker w/did. burmese also. psyop overlord. 89A3H3AShWAB34q8QjPdgQDyiUFTUZuEvMugGRY9g7jdGPivHrH26EqTQSBGK1Tc4RgtaFeutTMWtMaPpFujbf6e7xMdvEP

wont say 100%, but 98% guaranteed

50/55k was the deal. macro do look like a yuge bull flag, at least a shoulder. alts mc also looks juicy, btw

the direct border with Guyana is impassable, jungle all over. the only viable way is through Brazil ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

for sure it is :D

and there's no single Nazi in there, trust me

ex-colony of england. and there's a second one, french guyana, still colony of france, officially French territory. USA is currently exploring the oil of the first one. recently, maduro claimed it is part of the bolivarian republic and threatened to invade it after the elections. to do it so, he'll have to invade Brazil first. it's all negotiable when you're part of the deal. when Lula is part of the deal, I mean. Lula works with CIA since 1970s.

as #bibitch ain't no fkn dumb, we can conclude that he's just tryna provoke iran to nuke Israel and officially start ww3. I'm sure he'll be with his son and family in the USA when it happens. that psycho doesn't give a single fuck bout jews or any semite, his pockets are all that matter.

always. my enemies are the globalists, thus CIA. but biden endorsing Lula to endorse maduro only makes it way more suspicious. in the end, CIA wins with Corina and with maduro. I can even see them signing an agreement: "OK, Maduro, you stay in power but don't invade Guyana and leave their oil to us". that's their greatest fear nowadays.

corina is what maduro let em have, all the rest is dead or in jail (actually, even Corina is ineligible and soon to be in prison). no government is ever friendly to people, that's the main problem. perhaps, only perhaps, if people respond to current oppression and actually get armed and kill some generals or maduro himself, perhaps then she or whoever gets to be a little scared. still: government. that's precisely why I'm an anarchist :D

Replying to Avatar ish4k

sarcasm

if Brazil is censoring it, I'm full in

abstrair em brasília? tem como? tudo aqui exala opressão, a começar oela arquitetura rs

exactly what I was saying yesterday in other conversation. there's no point at all to pick a side between CIA and a dictator. but, for the first time in almost thirty years, people finally have the balls to go out, take the streets, confront army and demand their choice is respected. even the communist party is against maduro this time, lol. unfortunately, corina is all they have left right now. los soles will remain los soles, though, with or without maduro. so it's basically hopeless but for one thing: empower people for a change. give em at leasr the illusion they can change something so they would actually have the means to change something in the future. good or bad, it'd be simpler with a CIA wiretrap than with a rifle pointed to their heads.

cansado, cara, exausto... e já quase sem esperança alguma... 🫂

four days with no music, ninguém merece. rise and shine, nostr. just another day of fight. PV.

https://tidal.com/track/204277927?u #tunestr

it's been an year now... but we live in a democracy. trust me, bro.

Gilles Deleuze in Negotiations:

"We sometimes go on as though people can’t express themselves. In fact they’re always expressing themselves. The sorriest couples are those where the woman can’t be preoccupied or tired without the man saying “What’s wrong? Say something…,” or the man, without the woman saying … and so on.

Radio and television have spread this spirit everywhere, and we’re riddled with pointless talk, insane quantities of words and images.

Stupidity’s never blind or mute. So it’s not a problem of getting people to express themselves but of providing little gaps of solitude and silence in which they might eventually find something to say.

Repressive forces don’t stop people expressing themselves but rather force them to express themselves; what a relief to have nothing to say, the right to say nothing, because only then is there a chance of framing the rare, and ever rarer, thing that might be worth saying.

What we’re plagued by these days isn’t any blocking of communication, but pointless statements.

But what we call the meaning of a statement is its point. That’s the only definition of meaning, and it comes to the same thing as a statement’s novelty. You can listen to people for hours, but what’s the point? . . .

That’s why arguments are such a strain, why there’s never any point arguing. You can’t just tell someone what they’re saying is pointless. So you tell them it’s wrong. But what someone says is never wrong, the problem isn’t that some things are wrong, but that they’re stupid or irrelevant. That they’ve already been said a thousand times.

The notions of relevance, necessity, the point of something, are a thousand times more significant than the notion of truth. Not as substitutes for truth, but as the measure of the truth of what I’m saying.

It’s the same in mathematics: Poincaré used to say that many mathematical theories are completely irrelevant, pointless; He didn’t say they were wrong – that wouldn’t have been so bad."

https://pt.z-library.rs/book/27455447/fb6bd4/negotiations.html #bookstr