I was reading about the archimedean solid, catalan solid and rhombicuboctahedron (of which I can neither pronounce nor spell) . While the geodesic dome by Buckminster Fuller made it more mainstream, it was first imagined by Leonardo Da Vincci (who was both technically and creatively adept) followed by the inaugural naming thanks to Kepler’s proof of equations in the 1600s. Somehow all this led me to a 90’s Australian kids sci fi movie The Girl from Tomorrow and now I really want a transducer with a trigger on your pituitary gland telepathically for self healing, protection etc and PJ, an AI assisted computer in a diamond studded wristband that has hologram. That and rhombicuboctahedron as a time machine that uses electromagnetic waves, NIR, Near UV, Soundwaves. Imagination is truly a powerful thing!

Being stylish and being fashionable are two entirely different things, you can easily buy your way into being fashionable. Style, I think is in your DNA. It implies originality and courage - Iris Apfel

BRICS is expanding whether we like it on not. Bitcoin will be the peacemaker of global currency war domination

haha, i mean what does it mean for you as in will you be continuing as Nostr's designer ? btw I was reading a lot on design thinking last week - its interesting to learn how early-stage startup strategies leveraged plenty based on how designers think and operate - as designers are often user/end-game focused. I think you are an amazing designer and would be an amazing Nostr entrepreneur as well.

good morning, what happens after this grant phase ends ?

Strategy involves long-term planning and positioning, tactics focuses on immediate, concrete moves to gain an advantage

In chess, the queen wins by understanding the strengths and weaknesses of all the players in order to execute both strategy and tactics, rather than lumping them all together or treating them all the same

Nostr is the avant-garde of social media

Vivienne Westwood got it right

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/mV5vf3_515I

Yesterday was a public holiday and my siblings and I spent the long weekend helping my mom clean up her house. The insides needed some painting, and fortunately I managed to engage a freelance construction person, a women in her mid 60s with shiny white hair, who has way more speed and energy than I could have hoped for. She completed most of the work in 2 days what I would have taken months just planning and tapping 😂. That and I need an upgrade from my pink 2kg dumbbells.

The outside needed a lot of anti rust work and anti mold fixes before we can paint it so some sanding, welding, anti rust coats and pressure washing. We also got some gardening work done and unclogged the drains for her. While my bones are hurting my heart is happy.

I remember watching pressure washing videos and lawn mowing videos that are satisfying to watch. These videos get millions of views which YouTube compensates financially. If you thought touching grass felt good, try cutting it - makes you famous, who would have thought!

Anyone can be a content creator if they have an easy avenue to post, have engaging content and get financially compensated.

As I watch the YT videos, I thought it would be nice if I can zap these videos, but I think zaps can only work effectively on Nostr if

1) it has easy onboarding

2) large crowds.

Bringing in the large crowds though, is catch 22. Content creators will bring in their fans but at the same time they need new, fresh ways to increase fan base / followers / viewers.

The good thing abt Nostr is that many diff clients collectively will have many viewers lurking around. When each client puts in the work in bringing in new users, eventually it will add up.

The challenge for new users however, is finding or matching what interests them.

Ideally as we overcome the challenges and the culture of zap picks up, the number of real viewers could translate into the amount of zaps aka direct money.

Another thing about content creation is quality. Some are lazy. Some put in the work.

I have learned more from YT lecturers than the colleges I have paid for. However, only the most engaging lessons attract viewers, hence content creators have to up their game. Maybe one way to encourage quality contents (esp during the early stages) is through rewards, reviews, ratings etc

Then there’s that SEO where it’s a form of algo for content creators to reach a larger audience base. This is so old fashioned that Tik Tok revamped it completely to increase engagement. I’m sure Nostr can do a much better content creator’s algo tuning strategy in matching users that seek them out, then all of them put together.

I think there are a lot of opportunities in driving content creators onto Nostr. But it requires some work, and has to start with research - esp in understanding what are content creators utopia and pain points.

These can be done by reaching out to hundreds of content creators with diverse creations. Research is not easy work.

And when carrying out these interviews, one has to go with that tabula rasa mindset, a blank sheet, a clean state. Leave the ego behind. Leave the stubbornness of old ways behind.

Toyota in the 80s, before it ventured into the western market, sent a group of engineers and designers to live in the US, They lived in upscale neighborhoods, drove luxury cars, and studied the culture extensively. Only after immersing in that culture did the engineers and designers put their minds together and came up with Lexus to compete with the luxury automobile market.

I think there is so many amazing opportunities in Nostr but it requires a lot of work. The more problems we uncover and the more we know what we don't know - only then we will have the opportunities in finding solutions. I truly hope Nostr makes it ❤️

Alright now, off to the madness of the real world. Have a great week everybody!

Woke up thinking of this beat..whatever happened to Blu Cantrell?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMOKlXfXn50

The history and evolution of the concept of Design Thinking is absolutely fascinating.

TL;DR: Design Thinking is all about hacking designer's brain to figure out how they problem solve by focusing on end-users and studying their cognitive process. It took over 60 years to develop this concept into a step by step approach and adopted widely and globally.

1960: Buckminster Fuller proposed the concept of "Design Science Revolution"—to shift the focus of innovation, from military technology ("weaponry") to improving human lives ("livingry").

He hit fame for for completely something else though - on the geodesic dome architecture.

I love putting the pieces of the puzzles together on a timeline. The Buckminster Fuller era is right before the Beatnik, Punk, and Hackers movements, and challenged limitations on innovation and creativity amidst controls by the upper class. There was a lot of struggle among innovators during that time as they had to license out their designs to limited manufacturers who end up owning the brands. Fuller's work promoted forward-thinking solutions.

The beatnik era pushed forth creativity broadly (music, movies, universities) boosting the middle-class economy. Punk culture rebelled against mainstream norms with DIY creativity and individuality birthing the Maker’s culture, while Hackers innovated in technology and software, pioneering new computing approaches.

1969: Herbert A. Simon wrote "The Sciences of the Artificial." I am reading this at the moment. He introduced the idea of design as a way of thinking, emphasizing the importance of rapid prototyping/testing, which is now a crucial element of design thinking.

1973: Horst Rittel coined "Wicked Problems" to describe complex, undefined issues that require a deep understanding of people's needs, feelings, and behaviors.

Wicked problems are not your usual problems and doesn't have a binary solutions to it - for example natural disaster, food security, climate change, public health crisis etc

1973: Robert H. McKim published "Experiences in Visual Thinking."

I have read raving reviews on this book and can't wait to read it next. He emphasized solving problems visually through seeing, imagining, and drawing to enhance creativity. According this Kim, focused attention is key

1982: Nigel Cross published a seminal paper "Designerly Ways of Knowing." which explores how designers approach problem-solving differently from non-designers.

The cognitive processes and methods used to solve complex problems set the foundation for design thinking as a way to innovate and problem-solve

1982: Bryan Lawson shared his research on the differences between scientist and designers and how each solve problems.

Scientists are problem-focused, while designers are solution-focused.

For example a biologist studies why a certain species of plants in a forest are dying out by focusing on the problem - the root causes of the decline - soil conditions, climate changes, and insect infestations affecting the plants - "problem focused"

An interior designer tasked with redesigning a small apartment to maximize space and functionality will not be figuring out why the apartment is small, but rather, will brainstorm various layout options, storage solutions, and furniture arrangements to create a comfortable and efficient living environment for the client. - "solution focused"

1987: Peter Rowe published "Design Thinking." I have this book but I have never read it. He explores how design thinking applies in architecture, focusing on the cognitive processes of creating buildings and urban artifacts. His work advances the understanding of design thinking across various fields of specialization.

1991: IDEO was formed in the US by David Kelley, along with Bill Moggridge and Mike Nuttall as an innovation firm that developed and popularized tools and terms that made design thinking accessible and practical.

1992: Richard Buchanan published "Wicked Problems in Design Thinking" expanded design thinking beyond traditional disciplines, emphasizing empathy, collaboration, and interdisciplinary thinking to address socio-economic, environmental, and policy challenges.

2004: David Kelley went on to co-found the Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford (d.school). This became a Silicon Valley hype. He promoted the development, teaching, and application of design thinking, inspiring educational institutions worldwide. I met him about 10 years ago but did not realize who he was nor appreciated the value of design thinking back then.

Although the concept of design thinking is used a lot in software development these days and even in corporate entrepreneurship, it started off with hardware product developments and architecture.

And i think its absolutely interesting how design thinking originated by proposing that creative people think differently and that its worth looking into.

At its core, one of the biggest differences between the design-thinking approach and the traditional approach is the user-centric focus.

Design thinking revolves around understanding and addressing the needs, experiences, and challenges of end users or customers, whereas traditional thinking focuses more on the business itself rather than the customer.

A popular comparison is Blockbuster’s downfall versus Netflix’s rise. Blockbuster pushed for more brick-and-mortar stores, renting out DVDs, while Netflix switched to streaming after realizing its mail-order service was not user-friendly enough.

Traditional thinking is highly convergent, often jumping to solutions without thoroughly understanding customer problems. Design thinking incorporates both convergent and divergent elements. At first it diverges to understand the customers deeply, focusing on empathy and user insights. This foundation supports its convergent approach to creating innovative and meaningful solutions.

Children are highly divergent but as they get older, adults become convergent hence the lack of creativity in problem-solving approaches in adults. This is often due to how education, environment, exposure and knowledge shapes our thought processes.

Traditional thinking is also hierarchical and assumes upper management (and shareholders) have the best ideas, which the rest of the organization implements. In contrast, design thinking is highly collaborative, encouraging contributions from anyone, which can trigger productive ideas and solutions.

And the last comparison is that traditional thinking is linear and definitive. It imagines customer problems and implements solutions directly. I see many examples of this approach here. Design thinking is iterative and circular, starting with understanding the customers by engaging them, identifying problems, and designing solutions.

The design thinking process has a few elements. Over time, these elements have been made into stages but nothing set in stone.

1. Empathize: Understanding the user's needs, experiences, and emotions. This is done through engaging users via research, interviews, and observation to gain deep insights into their world.

2. Define: Articulating problem based on the info gathered at empathy stage. This leads to defining core issues to address.

3. Ideate: Generating multiple ideas and solutions via brainstorming and creative thinking, encouraging out-of-the-box thinking and having multiple perspectives.

4. Prototype: Creating tangible representations of the ideas, which can be sketches, models, simulations. Eventually leading to MVPs

5. Test: Evaluating the prototypes with real users to gather feedback. A very important process is refining and iterating on the solutions based on user input - so you go through few cycles until you hit a fairly stable product that can be widely adopted and has potentials to meet product-market fit. I've made this mistake here on not prioritizing this part, nor allocating sufficient time, budget and resources. And many entrepreneurs tend to make the mistake of forgoing this part.

For design thinking approach, the keywords are users and problem-solving for users. The focus is entirely around the end user. The solutions developed are directly aligned with their needs and preferences.

So is you are building or intending to build something, the initial questions to ask yourself would be - who are your target users ? Can you describe them ? Where can you find them ?

you can mute the bots ? I don't know who are these bots and I don't know whats the attack on Rabble is about. If its about his political orientation or his social life, he has a right to be here just like anyone else. To preach the holiness free speech while attacking someone else's definition of free speech is very confusing. At the end of the day, its not about you, me or Rabble defining what free speech is. It is about free will of the users and what they decide.

if you are not a fan of his client, why not just use another client on Nostr that you are comfortable with ? That's the goal of Nostr.

Picked up this book this morning 'A guide to Design and Development - Developer's Journey through the UX Process' by Tom Green and Joseph Labrecque as a self refresher for my own benefit.

It's interesting how early-stage entrepreneurship has benefited greatly from the way designers think and execute. While nothing is set in stone, many of these thought processes are general and can be adapted to anything one is working on, be it SW or HW.

I'll leave the Table of Content snapshots here in case anyone in interested in looking up for specific info. These concepts have been around for a long time and hundreds of people have written about it and adapted widely.

Designer - Dev relationship

TOC page 1 :

TOC Page 2 :

TOC Page 3 :

TOC Page 4:

TOC Page 5 :

politicians will say whatever it takes to get elected

nice! those paint sprayers are going into my Christmas wishlist of tools to have, but have been using a good ol' brush and rollers and its been ok. The prep for painting is often 70% of the workload! And oh boy, never going near a table saw.

Reading about the Navajo Code Talkers during WW2. The Japanese army deciphered all of the US army codes except for the marines who used the Navajo Codes.

Navajo language is complex with tonal features and intricate syntax. Each syllable has its own meaning and is spoken perfectly. Even the slightest change of tone will represent diff meaning. I found this challenge while learning Mandarin which has 4 diff tones and the same character in a diff tone means something else.

The idea of Navajo code talkers came from Philip Johnson who grew up in the Navajo reservations in Arizona and learnt the language since young. He proposed the concept to the Marine corps and they agreed to test it out.

They went on to recruit their 1st batch of 29 Navajos to join the marines.

The Navajo reservation (Navajo Nation) stretches across parts of Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico. There were about 50,000 Navajo Indians living on the reservation at this time (mid 90s).

Backtrack a little, in the 1860’s the Navajo people were forcefully removed from their ancestral lands in Arizona and walked for months, known as the "Long Walk," Many Navajo people died or suffered greatly due to harsh conditions, lack of food and water, and mistreatment by the U.S. military.

4 years later they were allowed to return but were placed on a reservation in what is now northeastern Arizona, northwestern New Mexico, and southeastern Utah.

The 1868 Navajo treaty that promised “free education” was a dark chapter in Native American history (the Indian boarding school era) where Navajo children were separated from their families and sent to government-run boarding schools and taught to assimilate into mainstream American culture and the Euro-American society by erasing their cultural identity and language.

Although the Navajo people were treated unfairly for decades, this did not stop the gov’t from asking Navajos for help during World War II or placing them as frontliners. The Navajo men had no idea what awaited them as Marine.

The 29 first recruits were to complete basic training (boot camp) in San Diego, California. The Navajos grew up living off the land—having to hunt, fish, haul water, and build homes. Yet it was seemingly the smaller requirements of marine life that were difficult for the Navajo recruits esp ie keeping their hair short, maintaining eye contact, wearing uniform etc. But cultural differences did not stop them.

All 29 Navajo recruits graduated from boot camp and went on to the next stage - creating the codes - at Camp Elliott in Southern Cali.

Here, they were taught basic electronics, how to communicate effectively through radio broadcasts, and how to use, maintain, and repair the radios they would be using in the field. Only then they went on to create the codes.

The Navajo Code Talkers created a coding system by:

1. Assigning English words to represent each letter (e.g., A=apple, B=bear).

2. Translating these English words into Navajo (e.g., apple=be-la-sana, bear=shush).

3. Using the Navajo words to represent each letter (e.g., A=be-la-sana, B=shush).

4. Further complicating the code by using three Navajo words for each letter (e.g., A=apple, ant, ax).

For example, to transmit "navy," they would say the Navajo code words for each letter (nesh-chee, wol-la-chee, a-keh-di-glini, tsah-as-zih).

The Navajo men practiced again and again until they could send and translate three-line messages in 20 seconds without any mistakes.

With the first recruit doing so well, hundreds of Navajos were recruited further to head to war

Navajo code talkers were sent to war during the summer of 1942. Since the Japanese were skilled at locating radio signals, the Navajo Code Talkers had to quickly set up, send code and decode, and relocate their equipment.

They were often at the forefront of battles, carrying bulky radios, setting up equipment under enemy fire and translating messages for U.S. troops in major Pacific battles.

During the Feb–March 1945 battle at Iwo Jima, 6 Navajo Code Talkers worked day and night sending over 800 messages, flawlessly.

This was a significant contribution to the US’s victory. The Navajo men were “the simplest, fastest, and most reliable” way to send secret messages, wrote Marine Captain Ralph Sturkey in his Iwo Jima battle report.

The Japanese never broke the Navajo code and surrendered in August 1945.

The Navajo code talkers were not allowed to talk about their experience when they returned home. Their code was classified. These decorated war heroes quietly went back to their lives on the reservation.

24 years later, in 69’ the militatry officially released the code and the stories of the Navajo Code Talkers started spreading. Aug 14 was declared as the National Navajo Code Talker Day.

56 years later after the Iwo Jima victory, the 29 original code talkers were awarded with Congressional Gold Medals. Only five were still alive to accept the award.

i remember you were in the land of fire and ice around this time last year. Did you catch the midnight sun?