"If technological progress is an indication of future developments, then the prospects of decentralization are bright."
"Whereas democracy gives power to the majority to rule over the minority, technology tends to offer individuals power over their own lives. Democracy takes power away from individuals, technology empowers them."
"The road to freedom"
so fckin simple !
next stop: Tannehill
Philipp Bagus, Professor an der Universidad Rey Juan Carlos in Madrid
Er meint:
Die Frage ist, ob der Staat überhaupt die Macht über das Geld haben solle. "Ist es nicht besser, ein privates Geld zu haben, ein freies Geld ?"
Anhörung im Finanzausschuss des Bundestages
Mhm.
The state / the EU bureaucracy / the supra-state is penetrating further and further into the economy, empowering itself more and more. And the frog is quietly simmering away.
“EU wants to better prepare internal market for times of crisis
The Covid-19 pandemic has presented the EU with major challenges. With a new emergency instrument, the member states want to better prepare the EU internal market for crises and supply chain difficulties in future. To this end, they adopted the Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Act on Friday.
https://www.euractiv.com/section/economy-jobs/news/eu-equips-single-market-for-crisis-management/
As announced by the Federal Ministry of Economics, the regulation is intended to strengthen the ability to act in future crises. To this end, the Act improves transparency and the exchange of information between member states, the EU Commission and companies. Crisis protocols, stress tests and simulations should enable the EU to take coordinated action in a future crisis. Secondly, in the event of a crisis, certain uncoordinated national measures that impair the internal market are to be prohibited in future.
In order to counter supply bottlenecks, the EU Commission, with the involvement of the member states, can also request information from companies that is required to overcome the crisis and recommend the production of certain crisis-relevant and strategically important goods for the EU. The Act also provides for adjustments to the harmonized procedures for standardization, conformity assessment and market surveillance for crisis-relevant goods in order to be able to place them on the market more quickly in the event of a crisis. Finally, the EU Commission could procure necessary products and services centrally at the request of the member states or together with them.
Following today's decision by the EU Member States, the Single Market Emergency Instrument still has to be formally adopted by the European Parliament.”
The state / the EU bureaucracy / the supra-state is penetrating further and further into the economy, empowering itself more and more. And the frog is quietly simmering away.
“EU wants to better prepare internal market for times of crisis
The Covid-19 pandemic has presented the EU with major challenges. With a new emergency instrument, the member states want to better prepare the EU internal market for crises and supply chain difficulties in future. To this end, they adopted the Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Act on Friday.
https://www.euractiv.com/section/economy-jobs/news/eu-equips-single-market-for-crisis-management/
As announced by the Federal Ministry of Economics, the regulation is intended to strengthen the ability to act in future crises. To this end, the Act improves transparency and the exchange of information between member states, the EU Commission and companies. Crisis protocols, stress tests and simulations should enable the EU to take coordinated action in a future crisis. Secondly, in the event of a crisis, certain uncoordinated national measures that impair the internal market are to be prohibited in future.
In order to counter supply bottlenecks, the EU Commission, with the involvement of the member states, can also request information from companies that is required to overcome the crisis and recommend the production of certain crisis-relevant and strategically important goods for the EU. The Act also provides for adjustments to the harmonized procedures for standardization, conformity assessment and market surveillance for crisis-relevant goods in order to be able to place them on the market more quickly in the event of a crisis. Finally, the EU Commission could procure necessary products and services centrally at the request of the member states or together with them.
Following today's decision by the EU Member States, the Single Market Emergency Instrument still has to be formally adopted by the European Parliament.”
published in 2012 !
great statements, exactly to the point, e.g.:
"why things keep getting worse:
... as there are too many people who acquire a vested interest in preserving the system."
They wouldn't understand xour question at all. For them that is two sides of the same coin / bitcoin.
wenn er einer der klügsten Köpfe der Gegenwart ist, dann wird ihn nicht groß stören, dass er in Russland "hocken" muss.
frag ihn doch einfach mal ...
imho influencers are as useful as dog poop on the sofa
https://viewfromthewing.com/airline-takes-revenge-after-bad-review-posts-passengers-passport-online/
ECHR ruling is a win.
This fcking Court is influential, Marty.
They are so dumb.
"the wall-street guys are the biggest degens, Marty."
this is going to be fun.
mempool will not clear
never
that is the point
Logan, whatch the hashrate.
well worth reading:
Report on the right to privacy in the digital age by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, published on 4 August 2022.
"23. In spite of its benefits, Governments sometimes restrict the use of encryption, for example for the protection of national security and combating crime, in particular to detect child sexual abuse material. Restrictions include bans on encrypted communications and criminalization for offering or using encryption tools or mandatory registration and licensing of encryption tools. Similarly, in some instances, encryption providers have been required to ensure that law enforcement or other government agencies have access to all communications upon request, which can effectively amount to a blanket restriction of encryption that could require, or at least encourage, the creation of some sort of back door (a built-in path to bypass encryption, allowing for covert access to data in plain text). Another form of interference with encryption is the requirement that key escrow systems be created and maintained, and all private keys needed to decrypt data be handed over to the Government or a designated third party. The imposition of traceability requirements, according to which providers need to be able to trace any message back to its supposed originator, could also require the weakening of encryption standards. Recently, various States have started imposing or considering general monitoring obligations for providers of digital communications, including those offering encrypted communications services. Such duties could effectively force those providers to abandon strong end-to-end encryption or to identify highly problematic workarounds (see paras. 27-28 below).
"
Uhh! ...."suing in court" !
that is truly courageous!
You #Pirates are part of this fckng clown world / parade. Not part of the solution. You won't change anything from the inside. And you known it. Stop lying to your electorate!
