Can anything be said of objective truth outside the communion of understanding?

Our experience exists, it becomes objective as we agree with it.

What happens then? Nothing good? Is winning a bad thing?

Your question is no more meaningful that what happens when things change. No doubt common understanding and shared reality produced common action in a population of nazis. Yet the common understanding and shared reality of their opposition productively permitted the war. Often productively looks like the work of the goddess Kali. That is not a good or bad thing.

We don’t learn the truth, we create it within a community of like minded actors shaping our shared reality. The limits of what may be shaped, the material of our creation, is pure potential and nothing actual. What makes it actual is the limits our community can put onto it (i.e., pure potential) with common understanding and common action. That is how the world works, be the actors individual atoms or individual humans.

How does on login to primal.net?

That he has more descendants than any other identifiable historical figure and that his grandson sat on his throne is impressive to me.

‘ish”

What will the use to buy oil?

As he said, he is terrified that something might happen that he doesn’t want to happen. Me too.

Indeed, to protect their democracy, they must dispense with the democratic processes. What processes are left to us?