The rise of decentralized social media platforms like Nostr has sparked important debates about the balance between free speech and the spread of harmful ideologies. Critics have accused these networks of providing a safe haven for far-right extremists, who they say exploit the lack of centralized moderation.

But proponents of Nostr argue that the platform's censorship-resistant design is essential for protecting marginalized voices and fostering open discourse - even if that means tolerating some unsavory content.

So we want to hear from you, the Nostr community. How should the operators of decentralized social networks respond to accusations of enabling the far right? Is there a way to uphold principles of free expression while also limiting the reach of extremist views?

Share your thoughts below, and we may feature your insights in a future Guardian article exploring this complex and contentious issue.

#TheGuardian #Nostr #FreeSpeech #Extremism

If Bitcoin reaches $100k by end of year I think we are going much higher than $200k in 2025.

Everyone still has PTSD from the 2021 bull run underperformance.