OH DID THAT STRIKE A NERVE
white dude leaves the suburbs now he's acting like Satan.
black man leaves the hood now he thinks he's Jesus.
and then there's Drake.
tldr; you seem to be part of the reason the rappers hesitate to address The Elephant in the Room.
Drake's got an excuse (flimsy, but still) cause he's Jewish.
Kendrick will pussyfoot around it cause he still thinks he's the hardest mfer on the planet for escaping Compton.
factor out wealth disparity and all of these apprehensions are still mutual. it's the attention that comes with it---the vilification of your human shield, the person brave enough to say what you would never for fear of losing all that is precious to you.
but the truth yields for no one, and at some point, you will be dragged into it beyond what is reconcilable to the masses on the sheer retributive value of your abuses of trust.
if you are so happy with yourself then leave me the fuck alone and stay out of it and don't try to get more sexual footage from someone I date. in other words, fuck off forever.
it's almost like that tendency to manipulate the world from the nether regions of the internet has never left you; truly, it was your way of maneuvering into and out of the realm of responsibility with just enough finesse to appear oblivious.
you had to serve them, too, and you did.
in fact, you're the one who used the black and brown community like YOUR human shield. that's where this all actually does involve you, and where your real responsibilities lie.
this isn't about some rap beef, relational beef, or monetary beef, and we all know it. you were the one who helped set those communities on a collision course with the Realities of Conservatism; and looking back, this very fact seems to be why so much of that 2010s era rap sounds like it was the brainchild of the Neo-Left, some bastard child of Communism.
I can't shake the feeling that you have only ever wanted someone who would never question the freakishness of that lack of morality and the way it infected black and brown communities toward the abject hatred of those who really would have preferred a respectful level of ambivalence toward racial identity as a linguistic programming tool.
you helped invent and disseminate an entire dialectic which led to more casualties of civility than most people ever want to imagine. so believe me when I say that I take everything in the vein of wokeness to be some sort of sick and cruel joke played on the youths, continue to grow up on these platforms.
do you honestly think you're not resented for this anymore? or is it just that there's never been a coherent narrative about HOW you helped shift the landscape of civilization toward the most vapid rephrasings of intentional retribution---bitter words spoken with a patronizing, condescending tone.
unironically, it's the thing that caused the whole rift in the first place and my only real concern was making sure the facts didn't go unnoticed and unacknowledged this time around.
I can't even IMAGINE the kinds of blackmail Mossad and CIA have on you; obviously, which is why your only option for redemption is to play handler for yet another fall guy.
that trust is dead.
don't even send that fucking tweet at 11:19, am or pm; and no 1:43's like it's junior high and nobody's gotta know.
I'm not done writing the report on you and I'll eventually get your handlers handled, too. (they all kinda like me tbh). bet you anything your dossier makes Elon look like he's a literal fucking saint.
fuck the manufactured rap beefs.
we are still at the beginning of an Uncivil War and no good man throws a woman under the bus to save his fuckin' homie anymore. you wanna hack someone? hack yourself.
Survival of the Richest
LIKE I SAID DRIZZY DIDN'T TEACH A BITCH HOW TO RAP IT WAS KENDRICK NOW EVERYONE SHUT THE FUCK UP.
k sorry but this is actually really funny
https://www.instagram.com/stories/champagnepapi/3358050588238036459?igsh=MXZ0M29waWUweGU4Nw==
I know I don't need anyone's money.
the question is when mine is going to actually be mine.
I think the right approach is to remember we are only human and prone to error. there's nothing wrong with reaching outside of your caste, especially if the high-risk of rejection doesn't fall on you. but don't make a mockery of love if you feel it and don't say it's not there if it is.
too many people might be counting on you to say it's not, yourself included; and in that case, you should keep it that way for your own sake.
I don't think anyone deliberates the meaning of fate more than people on the opposite ends of reality, but nobody is asking you to feel guilty about it. the awkwardness of being everyone's lucky break could make a simple thing feel obligatory if it's not what your heart really desires.
and in all honesty, it's kinda like looking into a two-way mirror without the observer's advantage - an entertaining kind of voyeurism that I'll never know or understand. maybe the conversation shouldn't happen because I don't think it's useful to know what parts were accurate and what parts came from total madness or something in-between.
think about all the people whose endless and relentless mockery relies on you - it would be like telling them they deserve to be disappointed and they'll call you a class traitor.
tbh, it's not like you owe me an apology for something I don't actually know for a fact that you did. I can't promise I wouldn't cry for a couple different reasons anyway and nobody needs to witness a scene like that.
here for myself and I expect nothing.
do or don't.
the dudes here are, uh, *very forward* 😂
a million mosquitos!
talking to my grandma is better than therapy.
wreckless dead weight abandonment can be a good thing.
I think about Satoshi often even though people say it was the CIA or the NSA or some secret government project.
I don't believe it, and while my guess as to who he is might be a wild one - there's like a one in a bajillion chance it's him - I like to believe that someday we'll know for sure.
unlikely, I know, but possible.
NGL, there is this terribly heartbreaking aspect of all of this, which is that the weakest of weak men (money rich, masculinity poor) seem to be under the impression that a good woman wants a man who finds himself egged on and turned off by the designation of a group which has found its safety in the realm of grifters and gifters - the media, the swindlers, the smear factory laborers, the Pharisees of our time, the liars.
what woman wants a man who lets other people trash her with no real reason except banal jealousy, spite, and hatred? shouldn't men be PROTECTING women from becoming the objects of some collective rage due to her perspective, insight, intelligence, or talent?
instead these types originate from the sewers of the internet where men believe women are better off not doing much at all; and why, when that would force him to sacrifice himself in some way or another to protect her in less predictable settings? or worse, to participate fully in raising a family so that she might explore her own ambitions for the sake of balance.
you know what's actually very sexy?
when a man's like "you're right" and he's STILL the one she relies on to do all the things good men are inclined to do. in order for a relationship to be happy, there really doesn't have to be a great deal of intellectual debate, if at all; in fact, I don't LIKE talking to a man I'm dating about politics very much. but respect for a woman's intelligence coincides with her respect for his actions.
thinking and doing are equally important, you know.
personally, I think the best men are the ones who motivate women to APPLY their intelligence to whatever they see fit. equally important, to not be an intertiatic force in her life, as the world provides too much of this already.
women don't really need men to tell them what's right or wrong, or to condemn their thoughts and opinions - nor do we want a man to.
no woman needs or wants a man who will judge her the way the world judges her.