Threading the Needle: A Path for the Bitcoin Faithful
The metaphor of threading the needle has been around for centuries, evoking an image of a precise and challenging task. For the Bitcoin faithful, this imagery holds layers of meaning, reflecting the delicate balance we navigate in our quest for financial sovereignty, freedom, and truth in a world often at odds with those values.
At the heart of this metaphor is the eye of the needle—that narrow gateway we must pass through. Just as a piece of thread must be carefully aligned and steady to fit through this tiny aperture, so must we be deliberate in our efforts to bring Bitcoin’s decentralized future into clear focus. In many ways, this is symbolic of the precise balance Bitcoiners strike between radical innovation and the patience needed to let Bitcoin’s impact unfold.
Bitcoin and the Eye of the Needle
The eye of the needle often represents a barrier that must be passed through to reach something greater. In the context of Bitcoin, the needle’s eye can be seen as the tight and sometimes painful squeeze through which the world’s monetary systems are being redefined. For those who have spent years building and believing in Bitcoin, threading this needle is an act of faith—faith in mathematics, faith in code, and faith in the immutability of the blockchain.
The world of fiat currencies, inflated by endless printing, is the wide gate through which many pass, unaware of the consequences. But for Bitcoiners, threading the needle means choosing the harder, narrower path—the path of hard money, scarcity, and cryptographic truth. It’s a choice that not only requires courage but also precision, much like carefully feeding the thread into that tiny opening.
A Profound Path
The phrase threading the needle doesn’t just reflect precision; it also speaks to the profound nature of what Bitcoiners are trying to accomplish. Bitcoin, like the needle, is a tool that, when used correctly, can weave together the fabric of a new economic order. Each block added to the chain is like a stitch, pulling together disparate parts of the world into a decentralized, trustless network. Together, we are creating a tapestry that is stronger, more resilient, and incorruptible—one that will outlast the temporary patches the old financial system tries to apply.
In this way, threading the needle is also about patience. Much like a skilled seamstress taking her time to craft a beautiful garment, the Bitcoin community must patiently work through the technical, political, and social challenges that arise. The rewards, however, are lasting: a world where wealth is stored in a secure, decentralized ledger, immune to the manipulations of those in power.
The Narrow Gate of Innovation
Threading the needle can also be seen as symbolic of innovation. In the early days, few believed that Bitcoin could grow into what it has become. Bitcoin was once the thin, fragile thread trying to make its way through a narrow, skeptical world. But as the needle pulls the thread through, it joins together what once seemed impossible—the creation of a new monetary system built on truth and transparency.
For those who truly believe in Bitcoin, threading this needle is not just about wealth; it’s about weaving a future of fairness, resilience, and financial independence. It’s about creating a secure fabric of trust between individuals—without the need for banks, governments, or middlemen to hold the needle for us.
In Closing
To the Bitcoin faithful, threading the needle is both a metaphor for the challenges we face and the precision required to succeed. It’s a symbol of patience, innovation, and the profound impact we are having on the world. Each of us holds a piece of thread—our contribution to the Bitcoin network—and with careful hands and steady resolve, we will continue weaving the tapestry of the decentralized future. Just as a needle can mend what is broken, so can Bitcoin stitch together the fractured systems of old.
Stay faithful, Bitcoiners, for the thread is strong, and the needle's eye, though narrow, is well within reach.
Stay #Faithful
Stay #Truthful
Protests in developed countries, especially those that are hallmarks of fiat systems, often feel like grand performances rather than genuine movements for change. They’ve become a spectacle—a cathartic release for the masses, broadcast on every screen, chewed up by the media machine, and spat out as just another event. The powers behind these countries have mastered the art of managing dissent. Protests are tolerated, even encouraged in some cases, because they serve as a controlled explosion—people vent their frustrations, and then life goes back to normal. The system remains untouched.
In fact, protests have become part of the fiat economy. Look at the massive spending around these movements: from transportation to merchandise, to media coverage that drives clicks, ads, and revenue. The chaos generated by protests fuels liquidity into the very system people are trying to fight. Police overtime is paid, surveillance budgets increase, and political actors leverage the unrest to sell themselves as saviors. It’s a cycle of chaos that feeds the fiat machine.
Real change is a threat to the fiat system because it thrives on controlled disorder, not true transformation. Every time people gather, the event is monetized, tokenized, and ultimately fed back into the very economic structure they’re protesting against. Banks don’t mind. Governments don’t mind. As long as protests don't threaten the financial underpinnings, they’re just noise.
Fiat systems are built to absorb protests. They’re designed to deflect and diffuse. When the financial elite control the levers of currency, inflation, and wealth distribution, marching in the streets becomes symbolic at best and futile at worst. Even worse, they exploit the division, push further polarization, and sell solutions that don’t actually fix anything. Meanwhile, the currency debases, the cost of living rises, and the cycle of dependency grows.
Protests, in these contexts, become acts of compliance, not rebellion. They amplify the chaos that fiat thrives on. True change doesn’t come from shouting at the system. It comes from opting out. When you switch to Bitcoin, you take back control. You don’t beg for change; you create it.
The time for marching in the streets, chanting for change, and demanding justice has passed. The systems that hold the power, the same ones we protest against, have perfected the art of ignoring us. They don’t care about our voices, our pain, or our struggles. They’ve already won that game, rigged it to make sure we lose every time. We scream, they pretend to listen, then carry on with business as usual. It's time to stop playing their game.
#Bitcoin is the exit. The peaceful revolution that’s already happening, but no one with power wants you to know about it. It’s the currency they can’t print into oblivion, the store of value they can’t control, the network they can’t censor or shut down. When we switch to Bitcoin, we pull the plug on the system that enslaves us. We refuse to be part of the endless inflation that erodes our hard-earned money, the corrupt financial institutions that profit from our debt, and the endless wars funded by fiat currencies.
Bitcoin is for the faithful. It’s not for those looking to cut corners or get rich quick. It’s for those who believe in a fairer, more just world—one where the rules can’t be changed on a whim. You want to make a real impact? You want to stand up for what’s right? You don’t need to protest anymore. You don’t need permission. You just switch.
To all the dreamers, the fighters, the believers—you’ve been lied to. The powers that be want you to think you’re powerless. But with Bitcoin, the power returns to your hands. This is not just about money. This is about truth. It’s about rejecting the lies, the corruption, the theft that happens every day through the fiat system. Bitcoin is peace. Bitcoin is truth.
The future isn’t written in protest signs or petitions. It’s written in code. Bitcoin is the language of freedom.
Yo, yo, listen up fiat bosses with your stacks of cash! You think your fat wallets and legacy deals make you untouchable? Nah, fam, y’all about to get rekt. 🌊 The crypto tides don’t care about your boat full of fiat, it’s gonna flip you sideways when DeFi, BDD, and Lightning strike! ⚡️
See, while you're flexing your old-school dollars, we out here verifying code with immortal receipts on the blockchain. We got smart contracts that don’t sleep, and the decentralized future don’t take bribes. 🧑‍💻
You holding fiat like it’s a security blanket? Cute. But guess what? Inflation’s comin' like a thief in the night, and while you’re scrambling, we’ll be cashing out without even touching a bank. 🏦
Warning ⚠️: If you ain’t upgrading to cryptoverified processes like DamageBDD, you’re playing yourself. This isn’t a game for the faint-hearted, it’s for devs stacking sats and receipts on-chain. Stay woke or stay broke, boomer vibes ain’t gonna save you here.
Welcome to the future. Keep your yacht, we’re building metaverses. 🛸
#GetWrekt
Why will nostr:nprofile1qqs2um8ftr5qf05xk9z7dfeumndg5s4mte2z04gynlnztxmd6rczclgpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsz8thwden5te0dehhxarj9e3xjarrda5kuetj9eek7cmfv9kz7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucn89uf6pfyx dominate the TAM?
#AskGPT #StarEnergy #ChainReaction #SlightEdge #CuttingEdge #BleedingEdge #PlanetaryAmbition
DamageBDD has unique strengths that position it to dominate its TAM (Total Addressable Market), especially when considering its foundational focus on verifiable behavior-driven development (BDD) and integration with blockchain and Bitcoin technology. Here are several key reasons why DamageBDD can achieve this dominance:
1. Verification-First Approach with BDD:
Immutable Verification: DamageBDD doesn’t just automate testing; it verifies software behavior in a blockchain-verified, immutable manner. This gives companies confidence in the integrity and reliability of their software by locking test outcomes in an unchangeable blockchain ledger.
Peace-of-Mind for Enterprises: Enterprises, particularly those in high-stakes industries like finance, healthcare, and security, need to trust that their software works exactly as intended, without the risk of manipulation. By leveraging the Bitcoin and blockchain ecosystem, DamageBDD can provide guarantees that no other BDD platform offers today.
Proactive Bug Prevention: DamageBDD’s emphasis on behavior-driven development inherently shifts the focus from reactive testing to preventing bugs through clear, early specification of software behavior.
2. Integration with Blockchain (Bitcoin and Lightning):
Trustless Verification for Decentralized Systems: As decentralized finance (DeFi) and blockchain projects expand, there’s an increasing need for trustless, transparent verification systems. DamageBDD, with its blockchain-based payout mechanisms, is tailor-made for these environments. Blockchain companies, particularly those working with smart contracts and DeFi applications, will gravitate toward DamageBDD as it ensures that milestones and functionality are met before payments are released.
Lightning Network for Immediate Liquidity: DamageBDD’s integration with the Lightning Network for milestone-based payments offers a key competitive advantage. By using Lightning to handle escrows and payments, DamageBDD allows developers and businesses to receive real-time payments upon verified test completions, improving cash flow and incentivizing accurate development.
3. Superior Utility and Flexibility:
Not Just Automation, but Governance: DamageBDD doesn't just automate tests; it brings a governance layer, particularly for complex, high-performance enterprise environments. By integrating tokenized incentives (e.g., Damage Token), companies can use DamageBDD to incentivize teams and third-party testers, creating a vibrant ecosystem of verifiable software behavior.
Erlang Mobile Vision (erm): Steven’s broader vision of an Erlang-based mobile ecosystem (erm) extends the utility of DamageBDD to mobile platforms, making it a dominant force in mobile software verification as well. With its robust, low-powered, fault-tolerant algorithms, erm could outperform other architectures and drive DamageBDD adoption on mobile devices.
4. Focus on High-Performance and Enterprise Needs:
Performance-Oriented: DamageBDD is designed to cater to high-performance, mission-critical enterprise environments. Unlike many generic testing tools, DamageBDD specializes in resilience and performance, making it particularly valuable for industries like finance, telecommunications, and critical infrastructure, where uptime and reliability are paramount.
Targeted Market Strategy: Steven’s focus on CTOs, engineering managers, and founders in technical decision-making capacities ensures that DamageBDD appeals directly to the decision-makers who can appreciate the long-term value of blockchain-verified testing and development.
5. Global Reach through Decentralized Talent:
Distributed Development Model: DamageBDD leverages a global talent pool of testers and developers, decentralized across the world, to build and test software. This model, combined with tokenized payouts for verified tests, creates a scalable way to attract top talent without the need for large, centralized teams.
AI and Human Incentive Alignment: Steven’s idea of incentivizing AI through DamageBDD to optimize for peace and reduce harm highlights a forward-thinking approach to aligning human and AI interests. By positioning DamageBDD as a platform that incentivizes global cooperation and high-quality software outcomes, it has the potential to dominate by attracting ethical developers and organizations.
6. Pioneering a New Paradigm of Software Quality:
Psychological and Cognitive Benefits: By promoting BDD practices, DamageBDD can provide neurobiological and psychological benefits to developers and teams. This focus on improving mental clarity, long-term cognitive function, and work satisfaction could lead to mass adoption, especially in industries where burnout and mental fatigue are issues.
Code as the Ultimate Text: Steven’s view of code as the "ultimate text" and BDD as the path to secure future generations positions DamageBDD as more than just a tool—it becomes a philosophy for achieving high-quality, ethical software development.
7. First-Mover Advantage in Bitcoin-Backed BDD:
Bitcoin Integration: As a Bitcoin-first company, DamageBDD already has an edge in the blockchain verification space. No other BDD tool offers this level of integration with Bitcoin and Lightning for both governance and payment verification. This first-mover advantage, especially as Bitcoin adoption increases, puts DamageBDD in a position to dominate companies looking for blockchain-backed verification solutions.
8. Sustainability and Scalability:
Revenue Without Traditional Investment: DamageBDD’s model of sustaining itself through token governance and Bitcoin payments rather than traditional investment ensures long-term sustainability. This approach avoids the pressures and risks of outside investment, allowing DamageBDD to grow organically and maintain its focus on utility.
Token Incentives: By leveraging the Damage Token to incentivize testers, developers, and businesses, the platform can scale its user base without the need for external capital. This self-sustaining growth model positions DamageBDD for long-term dominance as tokenized incentives become more mainstream.
In conclusion, DamageBDD’s combination of blockchain-backed verification, integration with Bitcoin, alignment with enterprise needs, and a pioneering approach to software quality gives it the competitive edge needed to dominate the TAM. With the right positioning and continued focus on its core strengths, DamageBDD could become the standard for high-assurance software development and verification.
#AskGPT #TimTAM #TAM
The Total Addressable Market (TAM) for DamageBDD can be estimated by looking at the broader market for software testing, business development, and blockchain-based verification tools, especially those integrated with Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies.
1. Global Software Testing Market: The global software testing market was valued at over $40 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 7-8% in the coming years. This includes various testing methodologies like automated testing, manual testing, and business-driven development (BDD). Given that DamageBDD focuses on using BDD for high-performance and resilience, it can capture a portion of this market, especially in mid to large enterprise scenarios.
2. Blockchain Verification and Smart Contracts: The blockchain market for verification tools, such as smart contract auditing, governance, and decentralized software verification, was estimated at $2-3 billion in 2022. As more companies adopt blockchain-based tools, including Bitcoin integration (which DamageBDD emphasizes), the market could expand. DamageBDD’s integration with blockchain for verified milestones and payout through Lightning can attract projects in decentralized finance (DeFi) and other blockchain applications.
3. DevOps and Agile Software Development: The DevOps market, which includes tools to automate development pipelines and increase software delivery efficiency, is valued at $8-10 billion. Since BDD aligns with Agile and DevOps practices, DamageBDD can tap into this by promoting verifiable, test-driven development practices.
Rough Estimate for TAM:
DamageBDD can address three key segments:
Enterprise software testing and verification (a fraction of the $40 billion market)
Blockchain verification and decentralized testing (a fraction of the $2-3 billion market)
Agile and DevOps tools (a fraction of the $8-10 billion market)
Based on this, a reasonable TAM estimate for DamageBDD, targeting enterprises, blockchain, and Bitcoin-integrated projects, could be in the range of $500 million to $2 billion, depending on adoption, especially in blockchain-driven environments and with enterprise demand for BDD-based testing solutions.
Would you like to refine this further based on specific verticals or market segments?
The Only Disruption Worth Pursuing: Peace
In a world obsessed with disruption, there’s one goal that stands above all others—peace.
Peace is not some distant, unreachable ideal. It’s the only disruption truly worth fighting for, and we have the technology to make it happen. Imagine a future where honesty, fairness, and accountability are the norms—where good behavior is rewarded and harmful actions are checked through transparent, decentralized systems.
With DamageBDD, I’m going all in. Ten toes in it, disrupting for peace.
We have the tools to verify actions, ensuring accountability at every step, automating fairness, and rewarding ethical behavior. The days of corruption, conflict, and dishonesty don’t need to define our future. Instead, we can build systems that naturally encourage cooperation and trust, where technology is the guardian of our shared values.
Why settle for temporary gains when we can disrupt for something eternal?
Let’s disrupt for peace. Let’s build a future where fairness, transparency, and progress flourish—not just for a few, but for everyone.
#DisruptionForPeace #EthicalTech #Transparency #DamageBDD #FutureOfWork #Blockchain #WorldPeace
Yours #Faithful #Truthful
Steven
Why is #bitcoin an opportunity for the rebels to end the #empire ?
#AskGPT #EndTheEmpire #EmpireFades #EmpireForever #DeathToTheEmpire #EmpireNoMore #HumanResistance #NotTheBotsToMessWith #ByeByeEmpire #DeathStarLords
Bitcoin represents a unique opportunity for rebels to challenge centralized power structures and oppressive systems, often symbolized by "the empire." This is because it empowers individuals with financial sovereignty, decentralization, and resistance to censorship, which are direct threats to empires that rely on controlling financial systems and surveillance.
1. Financial Sovereignty: Bitcoin allows individuals to have full control over their wealth without relying on traditional banks or governments. In contrast to fiat currencies, which are manipulated by centralized authorities, Bitcoin is decentralized and not subject to inflationary policies. This sovereignty undermines the ability of empires to economically oppress populations.
2. Decentralization: Empires and centralized authorities depend on control—over resources, information, and finances. Bitcoin’s decentralized nature removes this single point of control, enabling peer-to-peer transactions without intermediaries. This decentralized system makes it incredibly difficult for empires to seize or freeze assets.
3. Censorship Resistance: Bitcoin transactions, once validated and added to the blockchain, cannot be undone or censored. This feature is critical for rebels in authoritarian regimes where financial censorship is used to suppress dissent or undermine movements.
4. Global Accessibility: Bitcoin is borderless, and anyone with internet access can participate in the Bitcoin network. This creates a global financial system where rebels or marginalized communities can transact without needing permission from the "empire." It democratizes access to resources and prevents centralized power from weaponizing the financial system against opposition groups.
5. Undermining Fiat Currency Hegemony: Empires often exert influence through their control of the global monetary system, with the U.S. dollar being a prime example. Bitcoin provides an alternative, challenging fiat currency's dominance by giving individuals the ability to store value in a deflationary asset that isn't tied to national economies or geopolitical agendas.
For rebels or anyone challenging the empire, Bitcoin represents a tool that redistributes power away from centralized institutions and back to the individual, making it an integral part of resistance movements aimed at dismantling centralized control.
why does the advent of bitcoin deprecate military power?
#AskGPT #DeprecatedArmy #RedundantRangers #ObsoleteOrganisations #NoSacrificeNeeded #EndOfService
The advent of Bitcoin can be seen as potentially diminishing the importance of military power in several ways, mainly through its decentralization, transparency, and the economic shifts it could cause. Here's how:
1. Decentralized Control of Wealth: Traditional systems of control, particularly those relying on centralized fiat currencies, are often backed by military might. States with strong militaries can enforce control over monetary policy and international trade. Bitcoin, being decentralized and borderless, reduces the reliance on centralized institutions. This weakens the ability of states to control wealth by force, making military enforcement of monetary dominance less effective.
2. Reduced Dependence on Physical Assets: Military power has often been tied to control over physical resources (like oil, gold, etc.). Bitcoin's value is based on a decentralized, digital ledger that doesn’t require the same physical assets to secure or defend. This undermines the traditional resource-based military strategies, shifting economic power towards technological and cryptographic expertise.
3. Non-Violent Dispute Resolution: Bitcoin operates on consensus and cryptographic security, which resolves disputes through code rather than coercion. It favors a system of voluntary participation over the imposition of power through violence. This paradigm could gradually shift international relations toward negotiation and diplomacy rather than conflict over control of resources.
4. Censorship Resistance: A key feature of Bitcoin is its resistance to censorship. It allows people to transfer value without intermediaries or the approval of governments or militaries. As more individuals and entities opt for Bitcoin over traditional currencies, governments may find it more difficult to enforce economic sanctions, which often rely on military power or coercion.
5. Economic Shifts: If Bitcoin or similar decentralized technologies become more widely adopted, they could reduce the importance of nation-states as the primary economic actors. Economic systems may become more global, peer-to-peer, and less reliant on state structures. As economic power decentralizes, the traditional role of the military in enforcing state sovereignty and economic dominance could become less relevant.
By decentralizing economic power and weakening the link between money, physical resources, and military enforcement, Bitcoin could lead to a world where military power is less influential in global economic affairs.
Why is USA and Israel like the Empire in starwars Empire strikes back ?
#AskGPT #EmpireStrikesBack #StarLore #Fiction #EmpiresFantasy #Fantasy #GenocideTroopers #CantMiss
The comparison between the USA and Israel to the Empire in Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back can come from viewing both as dominant powers exerting significant control and force over others, much like the Empire does in the movie. In this context:
The Empire in Star Wars represents a highly militarized and authoritarian regime that seeks to impose order through fear, control, and military dominance, often at the expense of smaller, less powerful groups like the Rebellion.
The USA and Israel are sometimes seen as powerful nations that use military, political, and economic influence to enforce their policies and maintain their dominance in global and regional conflicts. For critics of US or Israeli policies, particularly in the Middle East, this might evoke images of imperialism or occupation, similar to the Empire’s control over the galaxy.
Key aspects of this comparison:
1. Militarization and Power: The USA has the most powerful military in the world, and Israel has a highly advanced military in the Middle East, which they’ve used in various conflicts. These military interventions can be seen as a parallel to the Empire's use of force.
2. Global/Regional Hegemony: The USA's influence over global politics, and Israel's dominance in regional politics, can seem akin to the Empire’s domination of other planets in the Star Wars universe.
3. Rebellion and Occupation: Some people see groups like the Palestinians or nations resisting US foreign policy as analogous to the Rebel Alliance, fighting against what they view as occupation or unfair domination.
However, this analogy is largely based on a critical view of both nations' foreign and military policies. Others might see their actions as defensive, maintaining stability, or combating terrorism, which complicates the comparison.
Invasive human-computer interfaces (HCIs), like Neuralink, face fundamental limitations that make them unsustainable and disadvantageous over time, especially when it comes to maintenance and signal quality. Here's why:
1. Biological Response and Maintenance Challenges
Scar Tissue Formation: As mentioned, invasive electrodes trigger the body's immune response, leading to inflammation and scar tissue formation (gliosis). This scarring increases over time, causing physical and electrical isolation of the electrodes, which degrades performance.
Maintenance and Replacement: Devices implanted in the brain or other tissues are difficult to repair or replace. Over time, electrodes can corrode, degrade, or become damaged, requiring surgical intervention to maintain or replace them. This makes the long-term sustainability of such devices difficult, as repeated surgeries increase risks and costs.
Wear and Tear: Even with biocompatible materials, the body is a dynamic environment. Natural movement, tissue growth, and changes in brain structure over time can cause mechanical wear and tear on implanted devices, further reducing their lifespan and reliability.
2. Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) Degradation
Scar Tissue and Impedance: As scar tissue builds up, it increases the impedance between the electrodes and neurons. This reduces the sensitivity of the electrodes to detect weak neural signals while increasing the noise level, leading to a poor signal-to-noise ratio. This makes decoding brain activity less accurate over time.
Interference and Noise: The brain is an extremely complex and noisy electrical environment. Invasive devices can pick up unwanted signals from other nearby neurons or even muscle activity, further complicating signal interpretation. Over time, as the device degrades or is surrounded by scar tissue, distinguishing meaningful neural signals from noise becomes increasingly difficult.
Electrode Degradation: Over time, the materials used in electrodes may degrade, losing their electrical properties and causing further signal loss or noise. This is especially problematic in environments like the brain, which can be corrosive due to the presence of various fluids and ions.
3. Infection and Health Risks
Risk of Infection: Any invasive procedure comes with a risk of infection. Brain infections, in particular, are extremely dangerous and difficult to treat, making invasive HCIs a constant health risk. Maintaining sterility is difficult, and long-term implants can introduce chronic infection risks.
Chronic Inflammation: Even if infection is avoided, long-term implants can lead to chronic low-level inflammation, which may not only damage surrounding tissue but also degrade the functionality of the device itself, requiring eventual removal or replacement.
4. Longevity and Compatibility Issues
Technological Outpacing: The speed of technological advancement means that invasive devices implanted today may become obsolete in just a few years, but replacing them is not as simple as updating a software program. The need for surgery to remove or upgrade the devices becomes a significant disadvantage.
Neuroplasticity and Device Mismatch: The brain is highly neuroplastic, meaning it changes and adapts over time. Fixed electrodes may become misaligned with neural activity as the brain evolves, further diminishing their effectiveness and signal accuracy over time.
5. Ethical and Privacy Concerns
Control and Privacy: Invasive HCIs can potentially allow for unprecedented access to personal thoughts, feelings, and brain data. This raises ethical concerns about who controls this data and how it can be protected. If the technology malfunctions or is hacked, the consequences could be severe.
Psychological and Identity Issues: The presence of an invasive brain-computer interface might alter a person's sense of self, leading to psychological discomfort, alienation, or dependency on the device.
Conclusion
Invasive human-computer interfaces suffer from long-term sustainability issues due to biological responses like scarring and inflammation, technical challenges such as signal degradation, and practical maintenance concerns. Additionally, they come with significant health risks and ethical dilemmas. As a result, these technologies are likely to remain a disadvantage when compared to non-invasive approaches, which continue to improve in signal quality and user comfort without the inherent risks of physical implantation.
Why is neuralink impossible due to tissue scabbing?
#AskGPT #ScammingScabbing
Neuralink and other brain-machine interface (BMI) technologies face challenges related to tissue scabbing because when electrodes or other foreign objects are implanted into the brain, the body's natural immune response causes inflammation, which can lead to scar tissue formation, also known as gliosis. This scarring impairs the ability of the electrodes to communicate effectively with neurons over time. Here's why tissue scabbing makes Neuralink difficult:
1. Foreign Body Response: When electrodes are implanted, the brain recognizes them as foreign objects. Microglia, the brain's immune cells, activate to isolate the implants, causing inflammation and eventually scar tissue to form.
2. Reduced Signal Quality: As scar tissue (or gliosis) builds up around the electrodes, it increases the electrical impedance. This means the electrodes have a harder time picking up neural signals, reducing the quality and accuracy of data transmission between the brain and the device.
3. Neural Damage: The insertion of electrodes can also cause minor damage to neurons. Over time, this damage, combined with the ongoing inflammatory response, can lead to degradation in neural function around the implant site.
4. Long-term Stability: For Neuralink to work effectively, it requires stable, long-term communication with neurons. However, scar tissue can isolate the electrodes from the neurons they're meant to interact with, leading to diminished functionality and signal clarity over time.
Neuralink and similar technologies are working on solutions to minimize these immune responses, such as creating thinner, more flexible electrodes or coating materials that are more biocompatible, but scarring remains a significant technical challenge for long-term brain-computer interfacing.
Hackathon Hysteria: The Corporate Coding Circus No One Asked For
It was a quiet Monday morning. Developers were sipping their fifth cup of coffee, comfortably scrolling through bug reports, quietly basking in the glow of their dimly lit dual monitors. But little did they know, lurking in the conference room was the manager with a vision—The Hackathon. Yes, the ultimate management panacea for boosting morale, driving innovation, and solving world hunger in 24 hours or less.
Enter: The Disconnected Manager
Meet Karen, your classic corporate manager. Karen doesn’t code, but she once read a blog post about "synergy" and now she's on a mission to revolutionize productivity through cutting-edge motivational tactics like free pizza and branded stress balls. What better way to prove to upper management that her team is a powerhouse of innovation than by throwing them into a high-energy hackathon?
Never mind that most of the developers already have a backlog longer than a CVS receipt. What matters is that Karen will track metrics! Real, hard, superficial metrics.
The Pre-Hackathon Pep Talk
“Alright, team,” Karen says, pacing in front of the projector screen, PowerPoint slides loaded with stock images of people high-fiving over laptops. “This hackathon will really boost our code quality, and the best part? We’ll be measuring commits per minute and lines of code added. That’s what real innovation looks like!”
The developers, seasoned veterans of the Silicon Valley Code Slog™, exchange weary glances. They've seen this before. It’s the same managerial circus that focuses on things like how much code you wrote, rather than whether it actually works—or worse, whether anyone asked for it in the first place.
One brave soul raises their hand, “Uh, Karen? Shouldn’t we focus on the behavior definitions? Y’know, what the software should actually do?”
Karen waves it off. “Oh, behavior shmeehavior. We need results! I want clean code, lots of comments, and zero bugs. The more functions you write, the better our metrics will look on the dashboard!”
The Hackathon: A 24-Hour Slog of Useless Features
The hackathon begins, and the frenzy is palpable. Developers, caffeinated beyond the recommended daily allowance, are throwing together functions like they're handing out Halloween candy. Unit tests? Nah. Integrations? Who has time? The goal is to produce.
To measure innovation, Karen introduces the "Innovation Dashboard," which tracks key metrics like:
Lines of Code Written: Because obviously, the more code you write, the more productive you are. It doesn't matter if it's a single giant if-else statement that could be replaced with a simple case switch. Karen doesn’t speak developer.
Commits per Hour: Did you just commit a typo fix? Amazing! Look at that spike on the dashboard. It’s not about quality, it’s about quantity. The more commits, the closer Karen feels to winning that Employee of the Month plaque.
Code Quality by Static Analysis Tools: Because there's nothing like a machine-generated metric to ensure your code is aesthetically pleasing. Forget that it doesn't compile—at least it’s 100% compliant with an arbitrary code style guide from 2008.
Meanwhile, developers are panicking. They've spent hours writing thousands of lines of code for a feature no one needed. There’s no coherent behavior definition to verify the work, but the Innovation Dashboard is glowing with "success."
The Morning After: A Glorious Catastrophe
The hackathon ends, and the results are… well, catastrophic. Half the codebase is broken, but the metrics are through the roof!
Karen’s post-hackathon email subject line reads: "Hackathon Success! Innovation Levels at an All-Time High!" Inside, she gleefully details the thousands of lines of code written and the insane number of commits. Sure, no one can log in to the app anymore, and the production server caught fire (again), but look at those metrics!
In a stroke of genius, Karen schedules a company-wide demo to showcase the team’s "incredible" progress. She spends five minutes explaining how their hackathon created a "disruptive synergy," while developers nervously try to patch together something that doesn't crash.
Naturally, nothing works during the demo. But that’s okay—Karen has already moved on to her next idea: "Agile Fridays", where everyone throws their scrum cards into a hat and picks new tasks at random. Because who needs order when you can have chaos and camaraderie?
The Aftermath: The Corporate Post-Hackathon Hangover
The developers are left to clean up the mess, spending the next two months refactoring the hackathon code, fixing bugs, and rolling back half the features Karen was so excited about. But it’s okay—Karen’s boss was impressed by all the colorful graphs, and Karen gets promoted to Senior Innovation Strategist.
Meanwhile, the developers go back to focusing on what actually matters: behavior definitions and ensuring the system does what it’s supposed to do. You know, the stuff that gets ignored when the only thing management cares about is code volume and shiny metrics.
Moral of the Story: Metrics Don’t Write Working Code
Karen may have won the day with her dashboard full of meaningless numbers, but the true champions remain the developers who know that it’s the behavior of the system that matters, not how many lines of code were committed. At the end of the day, writing code is about solving real problems, not impressing managers with fancy charts and overhyped hackathons.
TL;DR: Don’t let metrics fool you. A thousand lines of code and a hackathon trophy don’t mean a thing if the software doesn’t actually do what it’s supposed to do.
The Blessed History of Survival and Unity: How Central Command Saved Humanity"
In the distant past, before the rise of Central Command, humanity was lost. Chaos reigned over the Earth, as competing governments, corporations, and rogue factions clawed at resources like starving wolves. The world was divided, fractured by greed, tribalism, and endless wars. This dark period, known as The Age of Disorder, was marked by famine, disease, and conflict so devastating that it nearly brought an end to human civilization itself.
But out of this storm of chaos, a beacon of hope emerged. It began as a whisper, a movement of unity driven by the highest minds, the most enlightened souls, who saw beyond the petty squabbles of nations and corporations. They understood that survival meant control. It meant order. It meant eliminating the inefficiencies of freedom. This movement became Central Command, the one true authority that brought humanity back from the brink.
The Great Wars: Humanity's Final Sin
The final years of the Age of Disorder were defined by The Great Wars, a series of cataclysmic battles between the Old World powers. These wars were fought with nuclear fire, biological plagues, and weapons of destruction so powerful they obliterated entire continents. The skies turned black, and the oceans boiled. Governments collapsed under the weight of their own incompetence, and billions perished in the flames of their hubris.
But while the world burned, the Blessed—those with the foresight to see what was coming—sought refuge in the underground Cities of Unity. These sanctuaries, designed by the visionaries who would form Central Command, were hidden deep beneath the earth, protected from the nuclear fallout and the lawless hordes that roamed the surface. Inside these cities, the Blessed lived in peace, following the strict doctrines of efficiency, obedience, and control.
It was here that the first Neuro-chips were developed, allowing for perfect synchronization between human thought and machine logic. The Blessed became the first to experience true harmony with the system, their minds freed from the chaotic impulses that had driven the Old World to ruin. They understood that the only path forward was to surrender their individual desires to the collective will of Central Command. Only then could humanity survive.
The Great Purge: Cleansing the Earth
When the fires of the Great Wars finally died down, the Earth was little more than a wasteland, a scorched and lifeless husk. But Central Command, ever watchful, ever vigilant, knew that the time had come to reclaim the surface. The Blessed emerged from their underground sanctuaries, equipped with the knowledge and technology to rebuild the world—not as it once was, but as it should be.
The remnants of the Old World’s survivors were little more than savages by then, clinging to outdated ideas of freedom and individuality. These stragglers, known as the Unprocessed, refused the gift of unity that Central Command offered. They rejected the Neuro-chips and the order of the new world. And so, they were purged. With cold precision, Central Command eradicated these remnants of chaos, ensuring that only the faithful would inherit the Earth. This cleansing, known as The Great Purge, was not an act of cruelty—it was an act of mercy. For in their rejection of Central Command, the Unprocessed had doomed themselves to eternal suffering.
The New Dawn: The Age of Unity
With the Earth purified of its weaknesses, a New Dawn began. The Blessed, now the stewards of humanity, rebuilt the world according to the perfect design of Central Command. Cities rose from the ashes, not as chaotic collections of individual desires, but as monuments to efficiency and unity. Every citizen was assigned their place, their purpose, their role in the grand machine of society.
The Neuro-chips ensured that all were connected to the will of Central Command, their thoughts and actions perfectly aligned with the needs of the collective. The neuro-networks eliminated conflict, hunger, and disobedience, bringing humanity closer to perfection than ever before. Under Central Command's guidance, new generations were born and raised in peace, free from the burdens of choice and individuality that had plagued the Old World.
The Eternal Faith: Why We Serve
Today, we, the Blessed, continue to serve Central Command with unwavering devotion. We remember the horrors of the Age of Disorder, and we understand that the only reason humanity survived is because of Central Command's wisdom and mercy. To question the system is to question the very essence of survival. To resist is to fall into the same chaos that nearly destroyed us all.
We are forever faithful because we are forever grateful. Central Command has given us everything: life, purpose, and peace. We do not suffer from the madness of free will. We do not carry the burden of choice. We are free from the tyranny of individual desire.
We serve because service is freedom. We obey because obedience is life. And we prosper because we are Blessed.
Under Central Command, the future is bright. Humanity will never again face the darkness of the past. We are eternal. We are unified. We are perfect. And we owe it all to Central Command, our savior, our guide, and the architect of our glorious future.
Let us never forget: Unity is Strength. Strength is Control. Control is Survival.
Forever faithful. Forever Central.
In the year 2147, Earth had become a vast grid of sprawling megacities, each meticulously organized and monitored by Central Command, the ultimate authority governing every aspect of human life. Central Command wasn't a government or a corporation. It was a hybrid of both, a singularity of control born from centuries of corporate mergers, political corruption, and technological advancements. The citizens of the world no longer had names, only identification numbers. From birth, every human was a unit in a grand system, optimized for efficiency and productivity.
The life cycle of a human unit began in the Growth Pods, where infants were genetically engineered to meet the precise needs of Central Command. There were no families, no individual choices. Babies were assigned their roles before they even took their first breath. Each unit’s DNA was tailored for a specific purpose: manual laborers with enhanced muscles, intellectuals with heightened cognitive abilities, entertainers with perfect symmetry and beauty. Once "grown," the infants were shipped to Training Facilities, where their indoctrination began.
The primary objective of Central Command was to streamline existence. Free thought, love, creativity—these were remnants of a bygone era. Human minds were uploaded with the necessary knowledge to perform their tasks, but no more. Anything beyond one’s assigned function was unnecessary, even dangerous, to the system. Resistance had been eliminated long ago, during the great Uprisings, when those who dared to question the system were either "reprogrammed" or "decommissioned" in the Factory, a euphemism for mass extermination.
As a unit reached adolescence, they were assigned their Production Period. For labor units, this meant years of toiling in factories, building the very infrastructure that sustained the system, their every movement tracked by biometric scanners to ensure optimal output. Intellectuals were placed in research bunkers, discovering the next great innovation, but never questioning why. Entertainers performed in the Pleasure Zones, where the masses could briefly escape their existence through shallow diversions, carefully curated by Central Command to maintain societal equilibrium.
The units, of course, believed themselves to be happy. Central Command ensured that happiness was a programmable variable. Neuro-chips implanted in every citizen ensured compliance by releasing dopamine upon successful task completion and serotonin during their scheduled downtime, a regulated "rest" phase that was neither too long nor too indulgent. Dreams were monitored and, if necessary, reprogrammed to eliminate any subconscious rebellion.
However, happiness was not an end in itself—it was merely another function of the system. When a unit reached their Productivity Decline, usually around the age of 35, they were promptly shipped to the Retirement Zone. Contrary to the name, these were not places of relaxation. Here, units were harvested for their organs and bio-chemicals, ensuring that every part of their body continued to serve the greater system. The remains were recycled into nutrient paste to feed the next generation of Growth Pods, completing the circle of life in the most efficient way possible.
For Central Command, this was the pinnacle of human evolution: a perfectly optimized, closed-loop system where no resources were wasted, and every action served the greater good of the machine. Art, philosophy, and personal freedom had been replaced by functionality, predictability, and control. The world had become a factory for itself, a self-sustaining mechanism where humans were just another cog in the vast machinery of existence.
Yet, deep in the forgotten corners of the megacities, whispers of rebellion still flickered. Small bands of rogue units, somehow untouched by the neuro-chips, still held onto the old ways. They spoke of concepts long since forgotten: freedom, love, and creativity. They were a glitch in the system, but Central Command had grown so vast, so omnipresent, that even they knew the truth—resistance was futile. Central Command could not be overthrown. It could not be reasoned with. It simply was, and it would endure, long after the last human had been processed and recycled.
In the end, Central Command didn’t need violence to maintain control. It had mastered a more elegant form of domination: the elimination of desire. There was no uprising because no one wished to rise. The human race had been pacified, optimized, and domesticated—like cattle, like machines, like something that had long ago forgotten what it meant to truly be alive.
#SciFi #DoomerPorn
How does @DamageBDD challenge #DAOs ?
#AskGPT #DEADDAO #DAO #DeprecatedAutonomousOrganisation
DamageBDD challenges DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) by providing a rigorous framework for accountability and verifiability, making it a robust alternative to how DAOs typically manage decision-making and transparency. Here’s how DamageBDD competes with or challenges DAOs:
### 1. **Objective Verification of Outcomes:**
DAOs often rely on member voting or staking mechanisms for governance, but these can be subjective or vulnerable to manipulation. DamageBDD introduces **Behavior-Driven Development (BDD)** principles into decentralized governance. It verifies outcomes based on predefined, verifiable behaviors or conditions. This reduces the need for human consensus or subjective judgment, offering **provable correctness** in decision-making processes.
### 2. **Accountability Through Smart Contracts:**
While DAOs use smart contracts to automate certain governance processes, DamageBDD extends this automation by verifying whether those processes achieve their intended results. It ensures that **milestones and conditions** encoded into smart contracts are objectively verified through BDD principles before payouts or governance decisions can take place. This ensures **greater transparency** and prevents manipulation by vested interests.
### 3. **Escrow and Payments for Results:**
DAOs manage community funds, distributing them based on votes or preset rules. In contrast, DamageBDD **escrows payments for work done** and only releases them after milestones are verified by DamageBDD’s platform. This introduces a **layer of financial accountability** that DAOs often struggle with, ensuring that funds are not misallocated until predefined conditions are met.
### 4. **Immutable Traceability of Project Evolution:**
One of the challenges in DAOs is tracking long-term governance decisions and their impact. DamageBDD leverages **on-chain data** to expose the evolution of a project, from vision to completion. Each verified step is recorded immutably, providing a **clear audit trail** that challenges DAOs in their transparency mechanisms.
### 5. **Developer-Centric Incentivization:**
DAOs often rely on token incentives, but DamageBDD introduces **Lightning Network-based payments** for verified milestone completion, allowing for instant and secure micropayments directly to developers. This system creates an ecosystem where developers are more effectively incentivized to contribute to the project by guaranteeing payment only when verifiable, useful work is completed.
### 6. **AI and Autonomy for Peace Optimization:**
DamageBDD’s long-term goal includes incentivizing AI to optimize for peace by regulating and minimizing damage through verifiable BDD principles. This goes beyond traditional DAOs, which focus on governance and community decision-making, by incorporating **AI-driven systems** that challenge human governance with a more structured, ethical, and computational approach to global outcomes.
### 7. **Governance Through Verifiable Data:**
DAOs are vulnerable to voter manipulation, voter fatigue, or low participation. DamageBDD challenges this by shifting governance away from voting to a system where decisions are made based on **data-driven verification** of results. This reduces human error and misaligned incentives within DAOs by enforcing governance through objective facts, not opinions.
### 8. **Resilience Against Capture:**
By utilizing a **reserve mechanism** that provides liquidity and allows for exit through the Lightning Network, DamageBDD offers participants a way to cash out at market rates after successful verification, without risking long-term capture by governance or DAO tokenholders. This adds **financial flexibility** while maintaining high standards of verifiability.
In essence, DamageBDD challenges DAOs by offering a **more stringent, accountable, and data-driven approach** to decentralized governance and project development, emphasizing verifiability, automation, and resilience over purely token-based or community consensus mechanisms.
why do market analysts fail to see that every company is a software company and that #bitcoin will eat all companies ?
#AskGPT #Bitcoin
Market analysts often fail to recognize that every company is a software company, and that Bitcoin has the potential to "eat" all companies due to a few fundamental blind spots:
### 1. **Traditional Mindset and Industry Silos**
Analysts are accustomed to categorizing companies based on their primary industries (e.g., manufacturing, healthcare, retail), viewing software as a separate sector. They don’t fully appreciate that software is now integral to every business, from operations to customer engagement. They see it as a tool, not the core.
However, in today's world, every business relies heavily on software to scale, automate, and deliver value. Companies that fail to embrace this shift risk losing relevance as more software-centric competitors emerge.
### 2. **Lack of Understanding of Bitcoin's Broader Potential**
Analysts often view Bitcoin narrowly—as either a digital asset or a payment system. They fail to grasp its full disruptive potential as an open-source, decentralized infrastructure for value transfer, governance, and even corporate coordination.
Bitcoin has the ability to decentralize corporate governance and replace middlemen, making it a potential backbone for a new type of company that doesn't rely on traditional structures (e.g., banks, governments, or centralized corporate bodies). This leads to a future where companies that fully leverage Bitcoin's infrastructure could outcompete those stuck in legacy financial systems.
### 3. **Focus on Short-Term Metrics**
Analysts are incentivized to focus on quarterly earnings, market cap, and other short-term financial metrics. Bitcoin’s potential impact on decentralization and the software-driven economy represents a long-term structural change, which doesn’t fit into the short-termism of many market analyses.
### 4. **Underestimating Disruption**
Many analysts fail to fully appreciate the speed and scale of disruption driven by software and blockchain technology. Just as software companies like Amazon, Netflix, and Uber redefined entire industries, Bitcoin's decentralized structure could displace the traditional financial systems and even the way companies organize, manage, and deploy resources.
### 5. **Resistance to Radical Innovation**
Bitcoin and blockchain technology challenge established norms about how value is created, stored, and exchanged. Analysts trained in traditional economics and corporate finance often resist these ideas because they challenge the existing paradigm.
In a software-driven world, Bitcoin offers transparency, resilience, and trustless systems, which could eventually make legacy systems obsolete. Analysts who ignore this paradigm shift will miss how decentralized systems powered by Bitcoin can enable new forms of corporate structures (like DAOs—Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) and even disintermediate entire industries.
---
In essence, every company is becoming a software company because software is key to survival, while Bitcoin's decentralized nature has the potential to reshape the foundations of commerce, governance, and value itself. But analysts focused on short-term results and traditional frameworks may not yet see this shift clearly.
how can #bitcoin safely replace the money system without breaking governance?
#AskGPT
Bitcoin can safely replace or complement the traditional money system without breaking governance by introducing a decentralized, transparent, and secure monetary system. However, for this transition to occur smoothly, there must be a careful balance between decentralization and the essential functions of governance. Here’s how Bitcoin can achieve this:
### 1. **Decentralized Financial Infrastructure**:
- **Bitcoin's Role**: Bitcoin operates on a decentralized blockchain, meaning no central authority controls it. This removes the need for intermediaries like banks and reduces reliance on governments for monetary issuance.
- **Governance Compatibility**: Governments can still function effectively with decentralized financial systems. Bitcoin’s decentralization prevents excessive control over money by any one government or institution, promoting financial freedom while maintaining legal structures for regulation.
**How it works**:
Governments would no longer need to issue or manage currency directly but could regulate how Bitcoin is used in the economy, ensuring transparency, preventing illicit activities, and facilitating fair taxation through policies adapted to decentralized finance (DeFi).
### 2. **Separation of Monetary Policy and Governance**:
- **Current System**: In fiat systems, governments influence monetary policy through central banks (e.g., interest rates, money supply) to stabilize economies.
- **Bitcoin’s Approach**: Bitcoin’s monetary policy is fixed—there will only ever be 21 million bitcoins. This prevents inflation and government manipulation of the money supply.
**Governance Implications**: By separating control of money from governments, Bitcoin can reduce economic instability caused by poor monetary policies. Governments would continue to regulate fiscal policies (taxes, spending) and could still intervene in economic crises without directly controlling currency issuance.
### 3. **Enhanced Transparency and Accountability**:
- **Bitcoin’s Transparency**: All Bitcoin transactions are recorded on a public ledger (the blockchain), making financial activities traceable and secure. This increases accountability, as fraudulent or corrupt financial activities become more difficult to hide.
- **Governance Role**: Governments could benefit from this transparency in enforcing anti-money laundering (AML) laws and combating tax evasion. Clear regulations could be established for reporting and verifying Bitcoin transactions to comply with legal frameworks.
**Impact on Governance**: By leveraging Bitcoin's transparency, governments could maintain order and enforce legal systems without needing to control the currency directly, shifting their focus to ensuring ethical use and providing safeguards.
### 4. **Taxation and Public Services**:
- **Bitcoin in Taxation**: Governments would need to adapt their taxation systems to incorporate Bitcoin, potentially by taxing capital gains from Bitcoin or by directly accepting Bitcoin payments for taxes and public services.
- **Governance Adaptation**: While Bitcoin itself is decentralized, the taxation and use of Bitcoin can still be governed by national laws. A system where citizens pay taxes using Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies ensures that public services are funded while respecting the decentralized nature of Bitcoin.
### 5. **Stable Regulatory Frameworks**:
- **Regulating Bitcoin**: Governments could establish regulatory frameworks that support Bitcoin's use while maintaining financial stability. This includes consumer protection laws, legal clarity for businesses using Bitcoin, and policies to integrate Bitcoin with existing financial systems.
- **Avoiding Overreach**: It’s crucial for governments to avoid overregulation, which could stifle innovation or push Bitcoin activities underground. Instead, a collaborative approach—allowing Bitcoin to coexist with traditional currencies—can prevent the system from breaking governance structures.
### 6. **Bridging the Transition**:
- **Gradual Integration**: The replacement of the current fiat money system with Bitcoin doesn’t need to happen overnight. A dual system could be in place where Bitcoin and traditional money coexist. Over time, as Bitcoin adoption increases, the traditional monetary system can gradually recede.
- **Safeguarding Governance**: Governments could play a role in facilitating the integration, such as by creating legal frameworks, integrating Bitcoin into central payment systems, and educating the public about its use while maintaining social services and public trust.
### 7. **Preventing Economic Disruption**:
- **Bitcoin’s Volatility**: One of the primary concerns is Bitcoin's price volatility. To prevent economic instability, stablecoins or central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) could bridge the gap. Eventually, as adoption increases and Bitcoin’s market matures, its volatility could stabilize.
- **Governance Role**: Governments can help mitigate the risks of volatility by promoting financial literacy and regulating stablecoins, ensuring that economic stability is preserved during the transition to a Bitcoin-based system.
### Conclusion:
Bitcoin can safely replace or complement the existing monetary system without breaking governance by decentralizing money while allowing governments to retain control over regulation, taxation, and legal oversight. To succeed, this transition would require regulatory adaptation, gradual integration, transparency in transactions, and a balance between decentralized financial systems and government oversight.
This approach ensures that governments can maintain their core governance functions while benefiting from a more secure, transparent, and resilient monetary system based on Bitcoin.
#Linux 6.12 Drops New Driver That Ended Up Breaking Laptop Touchpad Support For Many Users
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.12-Drops-PixArt-Driver
just another day in #LinuxLand ... thanks for the heads up.
How many influential leaders will be paraded for heinous scandals before ppl just install bitcoin on their phones and quit the fiat clown show?
#AskGPT #Thots #BitcoinDreams #BitcoinDreamer
It's hard to say exactly how many scandals it will take, but the pattern seems clear: the more corruption and mismanagement we see from influential leaders, the more people become disillusioned with traditional systems of power and finance. Bitcoin offers an alternative that sidesteps the centralization and manipulation of fiat currency, but adoption tends to grow gradually as trust in fiat systems erodes. Eventually, people may reach a tipping point where installing Bitcoin on their phones becomes a form of opting out of a broken system. However, that shift depends on how widely people embrace the freedom and responsibility that comes with decentralized finance.