Understanding there isn't is your problem.
It's not nonsensical. I'm done talking about it because the debate is steeped in dogmatism and it's a waste of my time. I've made my arguments clear already. I am only walking away after discussing for days. Create whatever narrative you want if it helps you sleep at night.
Because they agree with him over ocean and knots and neither arguments actually have any weight to them. You believe how BS arguments now. You'll believe the narrative in the future too.
I'm done talking about it dude. This is my last post on the issue.
The point is he is swaying the opinion of people to be inclined to agree with him.
I am all in. And it's working better than anything else and I'm outperforming everyone I know...
I'm done talking about it. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Whatever man I'm done talking about it. You just wrong
Could Luke be gathering an army under the guise of decentralization and altruism. Then one day suggest the real solution is to actually remove OP_RETURN so arbitrary data can't get in at all. Guess what, then Bitcoin will fork and the people on knots will believe they are the good guys. Then they will all become poor when they sell the real orange coin. Just like Bcash. A clever way to spin the narrative. And the motive is there for a person that lost all their coins to a compromised key. That's one way to get rich again.
Anyone else thought of that?
No... I'm not concerned with the USD price of Bitcoin. I'm concerned with the amount of Bitcoin I have relative to other peoples stack of Bitcoin. I'm doing just fine. You're still playing a game. I opted out years ago.
Yes, it distorts the fee market.
Why would they have to pay more? That's just not true. Again you're wrong. Highest fee is highest fee. It's not more expensive because you go to some other nodes mempool.
I'm sorry I spent zero dollars and you spent thousands. You are so bewildered that people can actually learn stuff on their own without having to pay someone to teach them. The fact that you find that hard to believe is the astounding thing.
If you really don't like the new PR, you should really be petitioning to remove the OP code entirely. That's what most of you seem to actually be arguing for.
No they don't. If someone wants a transaction to be mined and it is valid, it will be done. That is the whole way the fee market works.
The source is that is the fact of the matter... The fact that you don't know that is exactly why your opinion on it is null an void.
You just don't want to admit to yourself you wasted your money on an appeal to authority. No wonder you don't know real economics. You were taught by the keynesian system.
Its not my thought, it's fact. And no, not every job requires a degree. SpaceX doesn't and they build rockets... You look at people without a degree as a bum off the street. That's your problem. I do engineering for a living yet I don't have a degree or even a PE stamp. You know what I have? Years of experience and a portfolio to prove I know how to do math. And I do it better than many PEs out there.
I have a better paying job than most college graduates... There are more companies accepting applications without college degrees every day... Your piece of paper to get you a job is on the decline.
Which is why the "full faith" part becomes less trustworthy every day. This nation will collapse for the same reason every other economic powerhouse failed. Loose fiscal policy.
The dollar is about proof of violence. The dollar has power not because of any reserves. I has value only because of the full faith and credit of the US government and their ability to pay back their loans.
There were only about ~700 non-standard OP returns on-chain previous to this PR, and now as this PR is coming to fruition, just on
nostr:nprofile1qy08wumn8ghj7en9v4j8xtnwdaehgu3wvfskuep0wphhqatvv9eqzrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqqg8plualm48yqv2etxcgkn7vsfz74fg5vdlp6nkz4ctxkapngxlp4uypp6uv 's node there are 2000 non-standard tx's waiting to be mined at this moment. And people are saying removing the filter won't increase spam? Just the mere act of saying they would remove it has increased spam by an order of magnitude.
Core is completely corrupt if they do not own up to the mistake and reverse course.
The whole point to removing the filter was to gain a more accurate picture of the real mempool. You would rather stick your head in the sand?
There were only about ~700 non-standard OP returns on-chain previous to this PR, and now as this PR is coming to fruition, just on
nostr:nprofile1qy08wumn8ghj7en9v4j8xtnwdaehgu3wvfskuep0wphhqatvv9eqzrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqqg8plualm48yqv2etxcgkn7vsfz74fg5vdlp6nkz4ctxkapngxlp4uypp6uv 's node there are 2000 non-standard tx's waiting to be mined at this moment. And people are saying removing the filter won't increase spam? Just the mere act of saying they would remove it has increased spam by an order of magnitude.
Core is completely corrupt if they do not own up to the mistake and reverse course.
There were that many waiting to be mined before the PR... You just didn't see them.
Appealing to a college degree is not the flex you think it is... Kamala Harris is more "educated" than me too.
I don't give a s*** about outpacing other nations in the short term. That's exactly what it is short-term thinking I want a nation that exists forever. All nations ever have collapsed because of loose monetary policy. If you knew History so much you think you would know that....
It would be quicker than me giving cash to you. I would have to go to you physically first of all....
The difference is when someone makes a bad investment, they cannot get bailed out.
I don't tell people to hoard Bitcoin... So...
No one has suggested that. I've never suggested just hodling. You have to spend money if you want to make money.
Really sounding like a banker my man...
People just do things. We don't need debt to just do things.
I self host. I'm connected to peers and have open channels... Not sure what the issue is. Here I am on amboss.
I told you to read this but it seems you didn't do it.
https://medium.com/bitcoinerrorlog/who-secures-bitcoin-95b19bbcda3c
"What about Miners?
Miners are suppliers of blocks, nothing more. Nodes demand consensus-compatible blocks as a vessel for key reassignment. Miners’ ability to influence the protocol is limited to the wiggle room within the protocol’s magic numbers.
For example, they can limit blocksize if they can cooperate and coordinate over shared incentives, and they can exclude transactions in the same way. But when a miner exercises any power that is detrimental to consensus they approach high risks at a quick pace.
This same dynamic applies to re-orgs, 51% attacks, etc. These attacks are not only risks to miners in that there is a cost in sacrificing blocks or failing probabilities, they run the higher-level risk of being entirely ignored and excluded from extra-protocol consensus, the market itself.
Nodes actually define what a “miner” is."
I'm well aware of how Bitcoin works.
No I don't. Once again ascribing motive to me that I do not have.
How are you not getting this man. Once a block is confirmed it's confirmed in your node my node and every other f****** node. Whether you like it or not you're not node contains JPEGs right now. You don't even understand the difference between confirmed blocks and mempool.
And I respect your right to filter your mempool however the f*** you want to. But you don't get to decide what blocks make it into your node.
It's not a rounding error. 84 is larger than 80. Data in OP return is not rounded.... It's counted in bytes. You're missing the point entirely.
