same message.

But then i deleted the : before the 0 and I got this:

like this:

umbrel:/$ lncli wallet bumpfee --sat_per_vbyte 20 b1d2a1d3ea96c2655dbec275c77dd86c5a223c700bd75522221e24d4823ef46e 0

and got this:

NAME:

lncli wallet bumpfee - Bumps the fee of an arbitrary input/transaction.

USAGE:

lncli wallet bumpfee [command options] outpoint

DESCRIPTION:

This command takes a different approach than bitcoind's bumpfee command.

lnd has a central batching engine in which inputs with similar fee rates

are batched together to save on transaction fees. Due to this, we cannot

rely on bumping the fee on a specific transaction, since transactions

can change at any point with the addition of new inputs. The list of

inputs that currently exist within lnd's central batching engine can be

retrieved through lncli wallet pendingsweeps.

When bumping the fee of an input that currently exists within lnd's

central batching engine, a higher fee transaction will be created that

replaces the lower fee transaction through the Replace-By-Fee (RBF)

policy.

This command also serves useful when wanting to perform a

Child-Pays-For-Parent (CPFP), where the child transaction pays for its

parent's fee. This can be done by specifying an outpoint within the low

fee transaction that is under the control of the wallet.

A fee preference must be provided, either through the conf_target or

sat_per_vbyte parameters.

Note that this command currently doesn't perform any validation checks

on the fee preference being provided. For now, the responsibility of

ensuring that the new fee preference is sufficient is delegated to the

user.

The force flag enables sweeping of inputs that are negatively yielding.

Normally it does not make sense to lose money on sweeping, unless a

parent transaction needs to get confirmed and there is only a small

output available to attach the child transaction to.

OPTIONS:

--conf_target value the number of blocks that the output should be swept on-chain within (default: 0)

--sat_per_vbyte value a manual fee expressed in sat/vbyte that should be used when sweeping the output (default: 0)

--force sweep even if the yield is negative

hmmmm…. now I get this: [lncli] rpc error: code = Unknown desc = the passed output does not belong to the wallet

done

but then I get this: -bash: lncli: command not found

So I type in: lncli wallet bumpfee --sat_per_vbyte 20 b1d2a1d3ea96c2655dbec275c77dd86c5a223c700bd75522221e24d4823ef46e:1

Worse thing that can happen if you specify the wrong output lets say :1 is that the command ends with: This transaction belongs not to this wallet. In that case use another output, lets say :0

after the semicolon :

This you have to include also in the bumpfee command...

yes i can find the channel_point. But not sure what you mean about the output?

I have no .

Is there another name for that? perhaps?

Im running umbrel btw.

1) Track in mempool.space at the transaction which keeps unconfirmed cause of low fees

2) open terminal and typ following command:

lncli wallet bumpfee --sat_per_vbyte 20

Example:

lncli wallet --sat_per_vbyte 20 220cd872104daca6f8be13e186aef9bd018cc3d8e4cf4961aa39328833c8edec:0

Anyone with special knowledge in bumping fees (child-pays-for-parent (CPFP)) on a force closed tx in terminal that would give me a 1:1 on how to do that?

Caffeine does have a diuretic effect, meaning it increases urine production, which can cause

dehydration if fluids aren't replaced. However, coffee is mostly made of water, which actually

balances out the diuretic effect when consumed in typical amounts.

The risk of dehydration comes with the use of caffeine supplements or drinking too much coffee throughout the day. The bottom line: there is no need to get rid of your morning cup of coffee if hydration is a concern. Instead, focus on where to add more caffeine-free fluids throughout the day.

Lololololol.

I love her.

She’s my spirit animal.

We should all be pissed he made that prediction though.

Good morning!

Welcome to another #InkblotArt note. Comment below about what you visualize with this blot and get zapped!

Not enough zappage?

Quote this note with a comment regarding what you see, and I will zap you again!

Bitcoin allows one to transact without middlemen.

The good: you can transact with anyone, including people without access to fiat rails, etc.

The bad: you can transact with anyone, including scammers etc.

Middlemen did check your counterparties and would cut many of the bad actors. Without middlemen, we're on our own.

Enter Nostr.

Nostr allows identities to accumulate trust signals from other identities, and then allows everyone to evaluate their counterparties. Don't trust middlemen (KYC), verify yourself (WoT).

If Nostr and Bitcoin succeed, the threshold for 'safely transacting online' drops to zero.

What kinds of marketplaces and online transactions could flourish if accepting payments and paying safely became free and frictionless?

Just thinking.

I hate AI.