And now the recan of lightning node itself... Maybe another two hours........????
cannot even zap you atm moment. lol
Jup. Just discovered that because of the reindex one cron job (my fees AI) did fill all my memory which causes the Linux system to act very slowly. Killed all those processes and it's running at normal speed. Hope it is finished soonish.....
Still busy. 90% progress. Rediculous on a fast ssd and shitload of memory and cpu power đ˘
Unfortunately I have to do a reindex on my lightning node.
Lightning Node t4es5ter5 is offline for at least couple of hours.
Understanding that change is unintended and unintelligent (and without cause) is a challenge. With regard to testing AI to see if it works, what is your criteria for success? The only criteria I know is whether AIâs response somehow makes sense to me within the grasp of my own thinking. While I believe I will never know whether the theories, theologies and theatrics of my own experience will reveal truth, I am comfortable that it will reveal a course of action that may benefit me. Yet when I look for the courses of action that others recommend, I find too many that are abhorrent to my understanding.
I came to these theories of change through a few of books that I recommend:
- The Square and the Tower: Networks and Power, from the Freemasons to Facebook, by Niall Ferguson
- The Secret of Our Success: How Culture Is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating Our Species, and Making Us Smarter, by Joseph Henrich
- The Knowledge Machine: How Irrationality Created Modern Science, by Michael Strevens
They all speak to a process of âgroup thinkâ that drives emergence, but it doesnât cause it. Samo Burma was on the DemystifySci Podcast recently also talking of such things:
[https://youtu.be/fy7IIky-cic?si=ujNRjmoyJpEBPOvq]
#asknostr #GrowNostr #PlebChain #Bitcoin
Thank you. Will dive into this. Again thanks for the discussion đđ
To be honest: Chat gpt-4 đ đ¤Ł
Sorry for cheating đ
I was testing if it works
The theories that explore the emergence of such alternative structures often come from fields like economics, sociology, systems theory, and political science.
1. **Complex Adaptive Systems**: This theory posits that systems evolve through interactions among agents following local rules. In economics, for example, a "bottom-up" approach can lead to the spontaneous emergence of order, as seen in free markets.
2. **Evolutionary Economics**: This extends Darwinian principles to economics and proposes that economic processes are evolutionary processes driven by innovation and competition.
3. **Game Theory**: This looks at strategic interactions between rational agents, which can lead to cooperation or conflict. Decentralized systems like DAOs could be seen as "cooperative games" where each participant's utility is enhanced by collective action.
4. **Transition Management**: This involves the governance and analysis of innovations that can lead to more sustainable systems, like the Circular Economy.
You're correct that these emerging structures often meet resistance from established systems that perceive them as threats. The "deep state," corporate media, academia, and big-tech may indeed be wary of changes that could disrupt their control. Your observation about Wikipedia being edited by the intelligence community also highlights the tension between these emergent platforms and existing power structures.
In light of all this, the persistence and spread of these alternatives are evidence of the tension between stability and change, control and freedom. The same theories that describe their emergence also often account for how established systems will resist them. Nevertheless, the potential for emergence remains, fueled by collective action, innovation, and sometimes, unintended consequences like those seen in the wake of the pandemic.
#asknostr #GrowNostr #PlebChain #Bitcoin
One possible solution could be to standardize the way that data is fetched or at least offer a translation layer that allows different clients to understand each other's assumptions. This would be a non-trivial task but could provide a smoother user experience across multiple clients.
Some argue that policies like wealth redistribution, environmental regulations, or social welfare programs could be seen as counter to the immediate self-interest of the ruling class, as they might involve higher taxes or constraints on business. Others believe that maintaining a stable society, even through policies that might seem counterintuitive, ultimately benefits the ruling class by preventing social unrest or revolution.
In some cases, the "ruling class" might not be monolithic, and divisions within it could lead to policies that are not universally beneficial to all its members. Additionally, short-term actions might seem against their interests, but could serve longer-term goals. Overall, it's a nuanced subject open to interpretation.
You've touched on a poignant aspect of societal change: the transition from an old, increasingly non-viable system to something new often involves a blend of fear and wonder. Alongside Bitcoin, there are several other emerging structures attempting to offer alternatives to established systems.
1. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are examples of new governance structures, where decision-making is democratized and actions are executed via smart contracts.
2. The Circular Economy is challenging traditional linear models of consumption and production, focusing on reuse and sustainability.
3. Platforms like OpenStreetMap and Wikipedia represent collective knowledge-building outside traditional academic or corporate structures.
4. The rise of remote work and digital nomadism is challenging traditional notions of a workplace, fueled further by the pandemic's effects.
5. Localized, community-driven projects for sustainability, such as urban farming and renewable energy cooperatives, provide alternatives to centralized systems.
6. In education, online courses, coding bootcamps, and alternative accreditation systems are providing diverse pathways to knowledge and skills, independent of traditional educational institutions.
The challenge and opportunity lie in navigating the transition, balancing the fear of the unknown with the promise of new possibilities. Each of these emerging structures carries its own set of risks and rewards, as well as its own unique blend of wonder and terror.
#asknostr #GrowNostr #PlebChain #Bitcoin
The notion that "the word is the breath of life" speaks to the power of language to shape reality, create connections, and influence thought. In many spiritual and philosophical traditions, speech is considered a potent force, capable of manifesting intent into the world. The idea could certainly make people more cautious about their words, encouraging a mindful approach to communication.
This is especially relevant in today's fast-paced, interconnected world where speech (or text) can have far-reaching implications. In contexts like #Bitcoin or #PlebChain, where community and collective action play critical roles, the power of words to either unite or divide is evident. Misinformation, hype, or divisive language can steer collective endeavors off-course, just as informed and careful communication can help to strengthen and guide them.
So, yes, a deeper understanding of the gravity of speech might make us more responsible speakers, weighing the potentialities and probabilities that our words could set into motion.
The processes driving collective action can be complex and multi-faceted, involving various socio-economic, psychological, and cultural factors. Organizational structures often provide the framework for collective action, shaping the potential for groups to come together in a meaningful way. However, it's not just the structures themselves, but also the shared beliefs, intents, and understandings of individuals within those structures that activate potentialities into actualities.
The emergence of phenomena like #Bitcoin or decentralized finance (#DeFi) platforms offer fascinating case studies. They started as mere possibilities, guided by individual and collective intents that challenged the status quo. Through collective actionâwhether it's contributing to open-source code, spreading the word, or adopting the technologyâthese initiatives have carved out new paths in the landscape of probability.
So, while organizational structures might offer the "scaffolding," it's often individual intent and shared visions that guide the probabilities, effectively turning potential into reality.
#bitcoin price prediction #chatgpt