Avatar
Narwhal Tacos
22778dea2244c522ca7d4b173f8c4f1caecf6f34ac39c91e2128c08f1e58d1fd
This is my Bitcoin Nostr account. There are others like it, but this one is mine. LNurl: gracelighthearted322747@getalby.com

Probably only for the O’Dell’s in the Nostr Nest, but worth noting:

https://www.cryptogon.com/?p=71121

If you mean keyboard input, I 100% agree. I can’t imagine how even a native speaker could master typing in essentially 3 different language-styles (katakana, hiragana & kanji).

I have a kanji dictionary and it takes me 20 minutes to even look up a kanji definition! :-)

To think that all our lives have been dematerialized and re-envisioned within the digital realm within a mere few fucking years…

…so seemingly seamlessly…

…so objectively objectively…

…so brutally gracefully…

Yet we worry whether Bitcoin will god-candle?

“The Fourth Turning” outlines that the seeds of change are planted before the Turning, then are nurtured and grow because of the Turning, so they arise fully formed at the time when Society craves new leadership based on the authentic demands of the transformant, dawning era.

Bitcoin is certainly this.

But many seeds are planted so that whatever is needed will flourish.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGldEYrHvKA

If only there was a Parable…a Book maybe…for a Truth that was discovered…

And then a Hoard of Influencers swarmed in, and built mock-truths to ride the power-train of this novel, unprecedented Truth:

Presenting countless false images, subscriber channels, investment funds, political and seemingly “non-political” influencers toward:

Accumulating power to incentivize the Gov’t to suppress the original Authentic Truth and promote their false “idolatry” instead.

Perhaps then, people might actually have some basis for an understanding of Real Truth as it is discovered in the world now.

And has suffered all of these tribulations.

This seems appropriately brilliant for our current fade-tech time-cycle.

People have grown tired of tech.

We don’t want advances, we want what we have that works. For another 40 years.

nostr:note1gxrnhrf3y844uvkqewh4fcvugy799pzcqrkrft5ahaqpyqk99zksqle895

I call BS on this type of thinking.

You are not in control. Of anything.

The sooner you learn to accept that, the sooner you will embrace your authenticity.

Long-time theatre actor…villains are the best to play. Hand’s down. Audiences love a well-played villain.

There’s an old saying “the nicest actors make the best villains”. Good people LOVE to express their ‘shadow side’ by playing villains.

For the record, the greatest villain in film history was Tim Roth in “Rob Roy”. Simple fact, not at all my personal opinion.

As an actor who’s played several ‘villains’, I get far, far better community-response from those roles than from protagonist roles. Depending on the script, of course.

All of them, honestly. The state of air travel in America has descended into what it was in the Third-World years ago. I stopped flying a couple years after 9/11. The humiliation ritual enacted on Americans was so obvious. Conversely, road-tripping is so empowering!

I’m 99.99% convinced that “Recycling” is just “second garbage”.

“When you decide to change your status signaling from things like beauty, power, and material achievement, to things like integrity, competence, and helpfulness.”

One of the fundamental recognitions in all real spiritual traditions is that everything moves within us and without us because of 3 forces aligning.

It’s said in many, many ways. My little brain understands it as: in All Things, Great and Small, there is an Ego-actor incentivized to act, there is the effect/response of the thing acted upon, and there is the Actualized Result (which is so often mis-identified & misunderstood, because it must be an integral part of the first two aligning correctly so that it’s not simply a mis-fire of the first two).

So while I get I sound like some spiritual rando on the Nostr-web, it’s fascinating to me that you used 2 examples of that understanding in one sentence. Just dropping into this convo to say that speaks to me.

Appreciate you, Lyn Alden.

Shots fired. nostr:note18gp9p9dhdhcf83e0em6j08usa60qt8lp5adn8xert5qr83lht5eqq85eg2

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

One of the big macro questions is when will the US banking system run into the liquidity floor, requiring the Fed to end quantitative tightening? Due to current regulations and the "ample reserve" regime, banks generally have liquidity requirements relative to their overall size, and their overall size keeps growing nominally.

-Big banks ran into the liquidity floor in September 2019 at $1.5 trillion with the repo spike, and the Fed had to end quantitative tightening and resume mild quantitative easing (which was then overshadowed by the giga-liquidity-bazooka in 2020/2021).

-Smaller banks ran into the liquidity floor in March 2023 at $3.0 trillion (the new floor) with the regional bank crisis. Both the Fed and the Treasury provided liquidity in response, although the Fed has maintained quantitative tightening. Liquidity has been maintained above that level without being greatly elevated, which is probably what would have happened post-2019 if not for the pandemic/lockdown stuff thereafter.

The New York Fed thinks the liquidity floor will be reached sometime in 2025, and that they'll go back to gradual balance sheet expansion then. Andy Constan, formerly of Bridgewater, thinks it'll be late 2025. I debate him a bit on this since both of us cover this closely, and I generally think it'll be mid 2025, although there are enough moving variables that neither early 2025 or late 2025 would surprise me, so conservatively I say "by the end of 2025."

I was talking to a large institutional investor today, and he said that his contact who is a major repo operator at an investment bank, thinks the current floor is now $3.3 trillion, which is roughly where it is currently. That basically means any further quantitative tightening has to be offset by reverse repo drainage, or they'll have a repo issue and the Fed will need to end QT. My estimate is somewhere in the $3.1-$3.2 trillion range for the liquidity floor, meaning I think there's a bit more room than that repo operator. But either way it's pretty tight.

This is all kind of rambling but generally when that liquidity floor is reached and is responded to, it tends to be good for a lot of liquidity-driven assets, including bitcoin. And it'll probably be with a whimper more than a bang, kind of like the September 2019 repo crisis that nobody other than macro nerds remember.

So Tether isn’t the new liquidity floor?

Asking for a friend.

Cuz I got nothing.