I wonder if end users can actually validate the rules of the drivechain themselves with affordable costs.
They were more worried about the idea that not enough end users would be able to run Bitcoin clients which fully validated all the protocol rules, which could undermine the decentralisation of the enforcement of the protocol rules.
- The Blocksize War Ch. 7 Bitcoin classic
https://blog.bitmex.com/the-blocksize-war-chapter-7-bitcoin-classic/
nostr:npub1ytwcmu0768dz2axyj9c5dkfaedne2jdwatv0nr9m4utx6xpkv2ksfrt58k님이 베타테스터로 참여해주신 #nostr 첫 라이브 스트리밍...
비트코인 + nostr 폼 미춌다미춌어...🥹🧡⚡️
https://nostr.build/av/289c42bf8646ecf7067385cf7f72117fdf3c61f51302f2df6f7c98da418c86b4.mp4
폼 미쵸따~
I agree with you, but I live in south😅
I am so excited by this kind of service. I'm sure that it will be the tipping point of #Nostr adoption. The world will recognize what the #Nostr is.
저는 이런 종류의 서비스가 기대됩니다. #Nostr 채택에 큰 전환점이 될 것이라고 확신합니다. 세상은 #Nostr 가 무엇인지 인식하게 될 것입니다.
nostr:note1nuwwk303ctrtj203t9e3ppvpmqcrd9xu3yddryfjwvmkmljac7dqhcx7pd
릴레이 목록에 egirl relay 등록하면 만천하에 공개된다는 뜻🤣
nostr:note1xkzvleu3nuyla5z4tf7ncm5nrsgcjpaqg7gatq5cck23jgghuqwqc5yqhg
올게 오는 중
다음은 아마 검열 시도?
nostr:note1g3nfaeet64p5r7ejvs697eccqg8sd6w4sg29k35yzgc8pleye5uqlg0hwg
I have so many questions.
zapstream에서 채팅이 안 돼서 100sats 두 번 날렸는데 혹시 받으셨나요?? 제 채팅창에는 zap 날린게 표시되는데 화면에 떠있는 채팅창에는 안 보이네요
So nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx gave an absolute masterclass on the problems with Musk's current Twitter approach on WBD, starting at the 17m mark. It's a great advertisement for Nostr and I recommend everyone watch it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ms-dE6aasA
I've been retweeting or reposting Odell's various observations on this topic for a while and so I'm happy to share this too, including on Twitter today, even as a filthy blue-check myself.
Where I disagree with Odell (slightly) is on tactics. He thinks people should give up blue checks in protest. And that's a very fair position. I don't disagree, especially for someone like Odell with a purist position and a generally cypherpunk audience.
But I think there are multiple successful paths on this. I have always been a Twitter fan, and my normie audience is there. I wanted to be able to pay for better UX and anti-impersonation defenses for years before they became available. Just because Musk is running it doesn't mean I won't pay for helpful services, especially if they protect my audience. Real people lose money to Lyn Alden impersonation scams if they can't tell my account from others, and I directly hear from them when it happens. It's always heartbreaking.
So, I'm on the offensive, not the defensive. The way I view it, unless or until someone censors me on Twitter, they're locked in there with me, rather than me being locked in there with them. If having a blue check reduces the success rate of impersonation scams and amplifies my reach at calling out Twitter's problems, I'll have the blue check. What I absolutely *won't* do is change what I say based on a blue check. If anything, I purposely overdo it to the opposite and exaggerate my criticisms on purpose to push back against platform incentives.
Two simultaneous approaches:
1) Call out the problem on Twitter. Don't give Musk a pass. Point out that a pro-freedom, pro-anonymity view doesn't match with what is going on there. Don't let his rhetoric disguise his inaction. If Twitter cares about freedom and anonymity then they will offer a paid option that doesn't require identity (e.g. the "orange check" bitcoin payment.) Until something like that, they are LARPing and are fair to criticize as such.
2) Have your foot here on Nostr and on decentralization technologies generally. In the long run, I think this is the future. And more importantly, I hope it is.
I hope to see you more frequently on #Nostr🤙
So nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx gave an absolute masterclass on the problems with Musk's current Twitter approach on WBD, starting at the 17m mark. It's a great advertisement for Nostr and I recommend everyone watch it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ms-dE6aasA
I've been retweeting or reposting Odell's various observations on this topic for a while and so I'm happy to share this too, including on Twitter today, even as a filthy blue-check myself.
Where I disagree with Odell (slightly) is on tactics. He thinks people should give up blue checks in protest. And that's a very fair position. I don't disagree, especially for someone like Odell with a purist position and a generally cypherpunk audience.
But I think there are multiple successful paths on this. I have always been a Twitter fan, and my normie audience is there. I wanted to be able to pay for better UX and anti-impersonation defenses for years before they became available. Just because Musk is running it doesn't mean I won't pay for helpful services, especially if they protect my audience. Real people lose money to Lyn Alden impersonation scams if they can't tell my account from others, and I directly hear from them when it happens. It's always heartbreaking.
So, I'm on the offensive, not the defensive. The way I view it, unless or until someone censors me on Twitter, they're locked in there with me, rather than me being locked in there with them. If having a blue check reduces the success rate of impersonation scams and amplifies my reach at calling out Twitter's problems, I'll have the blue check. What I absolutely *won't* do is change what I say based on a blue check. If anything, I purposely overdo it to the opposite and exaggerate my criticisms on purpose to push back against platform incentives.
Two simultaneous approaches:
1) Call out the problem on Twitter. Don't give Musk a pass. Point out that a pro-freedom, pro-anonymity view doesn't match with what is going on there. Don't let his rhetoric disguise his inaction. If Twitter cares about freedom and anonymity then they will offer a paid option that doesn't require identity (e.g. the "orange check" bitcoin payment.) Until something like that, they are LARPing and are fair to criticize as such.
2) Have your foot here on Nostr and on decentralization technologies generally. In the long run, I think this is the future. And more importantly, I hope it is.
비트코이너의 생각은 결국 비슷한 것 같다. 지난 여러번의 스페이스에서 트위터, 유튜브를 영영 떠나는 것이 전략적으로 맞는지에 대해 얘기했는데 해외에서도 비슷한 논의를 하고 있는 듯하다.
nostr:note1h34nqcvxexcu335d9vx86emrdp7vhj46zskkj7805hkjkl3wc6ps3urhxr
er.com/3rCC.gif