Avatar
Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: 🔜FOSDEM
24389949b53d16958eae22ba78a4040316903c933a9e8f9d9fd5f10688fc62af
🦊🦄⚧🂡ⓥ :anarchy: 👿🐧 :gentoo: :sun: Pleroma maintainer (mostly backend); BadWolf developer; Gentoo contributor; Eternal upstreamer Opinions are your employer Arch users needs to pacman -R works-for-me arch-btw Make the changes you want to see. Just because computer bad: X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H* banner from: https://soc.flyingcube.tech/objects/56f79be2-9013-4559-9826-f7dc392417db Federation-bots: #nobot

nostr:npub12tyk735v52ju032qahe3k2r520jlsujaem6xr8n0ex6u7eqj0anq59vnqc Yeah, release pace is about the only thing I don't like about it.

But I haven't actually used it yet lol. (I intend to use it for Pleroma's AdminFE as there needs to be a webpack migration anyway)

esbuild every other day: New release.

inb4 Gentoo grabs https://lists.alpinelinux.org/~alpine/aports setup because it's in this weird situation where some people pretty much ignore Github and other don't really like patches via email…

(And it's easy to grab the patchset via the web interface)

I also wonder if there's other projects, specially large, with this split over what platform/method should be used for sending patches, and if they managed to solve it.

inb4 Gentoo grabs https://lists.alpinelinux.org/~alpine/aports setup because it's in this weird situation where some people pretty much ignore Github and other don't really like patches via email…

(And it's easy to grab the patchset via the web interface)

A year later day-for-day after this issue and CVE.org still has Google Analytics with no comments from them…

https://github.com/CVEProject/cve-website/issues/1187

screenshot_mpv:watch?v=o-nPzDpDqYQ@00:01:40.167.jpg