Avatar
Dan Gould
2658362c3137eaa801fae404be36ffc80e16a61c43a891a3a046bec4b72e498a
obsessed with the bitcoin privacy problem, payjoin, snowmobile trails, and armchair 漢學

nostr:npub1spralxq6jlw5rdy0249vqr5sh43rfrlx2wzv3rhjjqedw559w9psrs8s72 nailed the right pleb 🫡

nostr:npub1yevrvtp3xl42sq06usztudhleq8pdfsugw5frgaqg6lvfdewfx9q6zqrkl congrats with the grant🤙 Keep it up, improving #bitcoin privacy is what we need !

Thanks for the very kind words Yegor 🫡

Design time nostr:note1406xguf6hss3epjzqqlh2ag078qatwmrlyzwg2u7gh700cagdgtq8wvs2l

Swab your teeth with probiotic once and prevent cavities forever? The treatment will be available for the first time in Próspera, Honduras this week.

https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/defying-cavity-lantern-bioworks-faq

Your typical payment + consolidation has to pay for 51% more block weight compared to a payjoin batching them together together.

Your typical P2TR Payjoin: 211.75 vBytes

A separate payment and consolidation costs ❗️ 320.75 vB combined.

152.25 vB P2TR payment:

https://mutinynet.com/tx/2c45dc6fef9feb32b9741cc3e6197eda94e1b0c45675e18818bfadce9fa94e20

168.5 vB P2TR consolidation:

https://mutinynet.com/tx/ef9263ed05c07f7ba933389eee7bfd62372e3dc4d1e697f96b7c66a215cc9b46

the lmstudio.ai site says 16GB minimum but your experience differs?

Any LLMs that write decent .nix ? Chat GPT 4 is borderline useless vs reading raw docs

Replying to Avatar awayslice

agree, and mentioning nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m ‘s support as well.

tho he notabley *didnt* mention bitcoin when speaking about foss examples.

hearing Matt say “he’s taken Square to more of a crypto direction” demonstrates an unsatisfactory narrative ignorance. so close

Love hearing the word “Nostr” come out of Matt Mullenweg’s mouth on the Tim Ferris Show this new year

https://tim.blog/2024/01/02/matt-mullenweg-2-transcript/

fee revenue* can’t forget the block reward

been trying to re-find this for years. Thanks for sharing

The best way I’ve found for multiple implementations to agree on a spec is the BIP process

implementation did come before BIP spec however

Replying to Avatar kukks

The nostr:npub155m2k8ml8sqn8w4dhh689vdv0t2twa8dgvkpnzfggxf4wfughjsq2cdcvg coinjoin plugin now supports automated, private coin consolidation during low-fee markets.

https://void.cat/d/Cd8y8XNRyvTYhLRztZcBkG.webp

does the feerate specified include coordinator fees?

I think it’s actually a lot more trivial than we’ve considered when you look at tx morphology in a graph vs isolation.

Looking at the graph as a whole, if it’s not too costly to pay for receiver input during time of payment you always prefer payjoin. Maybe some diagrams would help explain.

The two extremes should be ignored because they’re far outside of reality.

A payjoin with mixed script types is often better than the same payment done with basic transactions and later script mixing. It's an opportunity to save fees in consolidation. It's an opportunity to save with transaction cut-through. It's an opportunity to open lightning channels ASAP. A mixed input script payjoin offers still more ambiguous interpretations than the alternative chain of basic payment transactions.

When both sender and receiver to any transaction match input scripts then of course chain surveillance can't tell input sources apart by script type. However perfect should not be the enemy of good. Wallets can use different scripts. Payjoins with mixed input scripts make a more ambiguous blockchain and opportunities to save money bigtime.

I too embrace sanity