Avatar
bankless
2aa53cabe1ac739a3aa5e174ddcf3372153f0d317c0b085479399598e338bfac
May the Consensus Be with You bankless & self-hosted

I mean, that's proposal Nip05a, hahha

5 users per domain?

Welcome to Zapsonomy friends πŸ«‚

When you tell normies this πŸ‘‡it blows their minds

#[0]

If you're wondering what my profile pic is about, it is a:

Cypherpunk wearing a hooded Jedi robe with an invisible face and eyes shining like rubies, with lightning chain in the left hand and metal robot dog standing on the right hand.

I'm now attending the European blockchain convention and none of the people I talked to have a CLUE about the nostr & lightning disruption that is coming soon.

So funny :))

I'm not sure that the relays are ready to retrieve multisig. Anyways it shines really promising.

What I thought was to put all relays on a chain (bitcoin or sidechain) so they add some crucial data simultaneously.

For example, if the user wants to have 2FA - this data would be added to the next block so all relays accept messages from this user only signed with 2FA.

Haha, love it :)

Thank you, I see πŸ«‚

Even though I never coded anything more complex than a 'Hello world' message, I'll dig into this topic and maybe even propose a NIP πŸ€™

Have a great weekend β˜€οΈ

If so, it will have no sense, of course.

On the other hand, if it could be used as a second layer proof?πŸ™„ But then any activity should be signed with both the private key and TOTP, I believe. And also it is questionable if you can have several authenticatee relays...

So it will make no sense, or?

But then if your private key leaks, there is no sense in it, right?

Hey hey, dear #[0] #[1] #[2] #[3] 🀟

Is there any possibility to implement 2FA to #nostr?

W it shines for me that would make the protocol unbeatable in terms of security.

Sorry if this question makes no sense πŸ™

Replying to Avatar 0xtr

πŸ«‚

πŸ«‚πŸ«‚πŸ€—

Bitcoin is a product innovation

Lightning is a process innovation

Agree?