Avatar
Ademan
2cb30c36438bad4a2a5107bc98f5cebe6a0229b0554d8cfbd1c99aa3cc7ecec1
Neanderthal hacking on Bitcoin stuff. LNHANCE please!

This is their policy, you need "reliable" secondary sources that interpret and explain things. This is unfortunate because all "reliable" secondary sources are garbage these days.

When sharing a nostr link, most (all?) services won't generate a useful preview for js based clients like coracle or iris (I believe they look at the open graph meta tags in the html result), but I think I remember there was one service that would do server side rendering for your note, had decent previews, and had links to open the note in other clients.

Anyone know what I'm talking about? #asknostr

#test another test

> it didn't work the first time

> imagine testing publicly

lmao just noticed the year is totally messed up, oh well, plenty of work to do left

I am working on something incredibly stupid

#test

This is a test

When will they revise it down? lol

Why doesn't NIP-96 have the authorization event commit to the upload hash? It *seems* like it should, but I guess it's not *necessary* because of https? It would actually be cool to not require https, since https (effectively) implies reliance on centralized CAs and DNS.

I'm sure he doesn't. Plus nostr is a potential competitor.

Ah that's true.

At the very least, supporting *emphasis* **emphasis** and block quotes in addition to the preformatted text you already do (on opt-in posts) would be nice. Since you're fiatjaf anyway you can overrule fiatjaf's fiat ruling on no-rich-text ;-)

I mean I think every client is already processing image embeds anyway. markdown tables are human readable (nice to look at in plain text, even!).

Link aliases is probably the one that shouldn't be supported.

lol, it's more like a technical shitpost I'm using to dip my toes into nostr dev, but a sufficiently shitty journo could definitely spin it