Yes, physical gold is definitely being manipulated heavily. Bitcoin on the other hand due to its properties is much harder to manipulate in the same fashion, if not impossible at all.
Nice to see we agree on something. And honestly I don't think aether tech is outside the realm of possibility.
I don’t have any examples including Egyptian artifacts on hands, but here are examples of fossils found in Alaska. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0862/report.pdf As you can see samples SL-454 and SL-455 show show a large discrepancy even though both come from the same source. Same as with samples 299, M-37 and L-137X. Here is a more general video about problems with carbon dating and questionable assumptions made when using this method. https://youtu.be/lg5aDoYUyBk
Right, I grouped different dating techniques into a single point. All of them never consistently correctly dated materials of the known age, and in case of radiometric dating it was off by tens of millions of years. Talking about carbon dating, it still is based on a number of very questionable assumptions and any results not matching the official history are always simply discarded. Anyways, it was not the main point I was making.
Regarding the dark ages and lost knowledge, I agree with you. In that sense the official historic narrative does not explain a lot of different observations.
No, not really. I heard other people had similar issues, but that was a couple of months ago. It should be possible to restore it with nostrgram.co client, but I have been unable to do so, probably due to using Tor browser.
Ability to build more complex structures (proven by hundreds if not thousands of remaining examples all over the world), and possibly the ability to harvest electricity from the aether.
All my follows just got nuked 🫠
Interesting. While I agree that the holocaust is mostly a lie (in a sense that it were actually Slavs and Aryans being killed en mass, and not jews), to me it seems that the possibility of previous more advanced civilizations existing before completely disappearing is more significant.
The thing is that in cases where the actual age of the tested material was known, carbon dating was off by tens of thousands of years or even millions in some cases. People have literally sent their own teeth for testing to different laboratories and got completely different results telling them their own teeth are many thousand years old. And if carbon dating is so extremely bad at dating recent materials, in no way it can be seriously trusted when testing very old material of an unknown age.
They supposedly did query some of the stones nearby, but some of it still was transported by river as official history puts it. The mystery of construction is still a mystery only explained by unrealistic theories that to me look highly questionable to say the least.
I believe they could have made all the progress in the world. Moreover, I am inclined to think that people back then had technologies way more advanced than anything we have currently. The problem is with official history that depicts them as basically cavemen only with pickaxes and ropes who dragged all those gigantic perfectly cut boulders by hand.
You are free to believe any theories thrown your way, however unrealistic they might sound. But I just can’t make myself believe them, it does not add up in my honest opinion.
Yes, shorting is a possibility. However, it can only be done on paper. Sure, it might influence the price somewhat in the short term, but it can't be sustained forever and making bitcoin cheap is not anyhow suppressing its main fundamental features, the main one being not controlled by anyone in any meaningful way.
This should look okay.
For some reason nostr.build compresses the shit out of it... https://ufile.io/oy3h3mhd
It is not just ugly, it is objectively way more simplistic in many aspects. And when you account for the supposed stark difference in technologies available the official historic narrative becomes completely unbelievable.
I think this is a very simplistic view. Some of the incredible details we can see are of perfect form and geometry. People using simple tools just could not create them in such a manner, it is extremely difficult to do even with all of the modern technologies we have. Long time it possibly took to build does not change this fundamental fact.
Carbon dating isn't perfect but it is being constantly honed and to simply call it guessing is dismissive.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/long-awaited-update-arrives-for-radiocarbon-dating/
As long as the object is less than 20kya and is not an animal of some sort the dating works very well. Remember we aren't trying to date to the day, week or month. As long as we are within a decade or so we are going to be ok ordering the ages of these pyramids.
As to a potential solution. I like the one presented in this video.
Carbon dating has never produced accurate results for samples of provably known age. There is no reason to believe it can actually date materials of supposedly much higher unknown age. It is a good example of purely theoretical make believe that plagues most modern sciences.
I mean, sounds good in theory, but can you honestly imagine groups of 30-60 guys dragging huge stones weighing multiple stones at a pretty high angle for long distances? Seems highly unrealistic to me, to say the least. As for the theory of the French guy from the video if I understood it correctly - dragging those extremely heavy stones along narrow ramps with 90 degree angles seems also highly impossible. All of those explanations are purely theoretical and on a closer look have nothing in common with reality. https://www.reddit.com/r/AlternativeHistory/comments/twzhng/comment/i3jrynd
Also, consider Colossi of Memnon, two gigantic strictures weighing 700 tons each supposedly moved 680km over land. These things simply do not have a proper realistic explanation in the realm of official history.