Avatar
Bridger Surge
32a8319a959a20398274b105b6a3a9f47577ee54017f599e260146c73ec66b53
🫔 The government is a criminal organization.

When I refresh and nothing new shows up I always check if I’m still connected to my relays. Can’t miss that good nostr content.

Neuralink? No thank you.

Nostr beamed straight into my mind’s eye? Yes please.

Day 113 of #100pushups until #Bitcoin hits $100k.

34x3 throughout the day + legs at the gym

I’ll admit I’m a little addicted to #nostr. I find myself refreshing the feed several times a minute to see if there’s something new posted.

Got a small interest free loan from my workplace. Used it to buy #bitcoin.

The claim that #bitcoin has no ā€œintrinsic valueā€, besides its scarcity, is senseless. Sure, a bitcoin might not be a physical coin (even though electrons and bits in logic gates on a computer are equally as real as the atoms in a gold bullion), but the service Bitcoin provides is valuable. It’s the only money that is on a decentralized and verifiable open ledger; the only money that’s infinitely divisible; the only money that can be held in one’s head across time and space; the only money that’s non-inflationary (and in some instances deflationary); the only money that is cryptographically secure; the only money that is purposefully engineered to be money; and much more.

ā€œBitcoin doesn’t physically exist, it has no value.ā€

If that’s true then no piece of information ever has any value — that’s a verifiably false assumption (philosophy, language, science…)

Dang. Rip. nostr:note132r862kg6qselkt9gw6hnarl4zwn22j5kufke2zrc6u7pq4dujxs0m3xpe

Day 112 of #100pushups until #Bitcoin hits $100k.

34x3 throughout the day + back and arms at the gym.

#Bitcoin going up? Did the CEO stack enough sats at low prices?

As long as money is controlled by the government we will never have a free monetary system. All this talk about [lowering or raising] interest rates is to make you forget that government shouldn’t be in control of the economy at all.

ā€œI don't believe we shall ever have good money again before we take the thing out of the hands of government...ā€ F. A. Hayek

This was #gold, but it failed; the government took it.

This is #bitcoin, and it is winning; the government will never take it.

When people dismiss evolution as a conspiracy, I find it confusing. To me, evolution and innovation are essentially the same thing. Evolution is about growth, adaptation, and the development of complexity over time, and that’s exactly what innovation is too.

Innovation builds upon what exists, making it more advanced, more intricate—just like evolution. If someone claims they don’t believe in evolution, are they saying they also don’t believe in innovation? Because when you look at how technology, society, or even nature advances, it’s always a process of building on top of what’s already there.

Think about it: as things evolve, whether it’s species or technologies, they adapt to their environments and refine their functions. Just like innovation refines ideas, systems, and technologies, both processes involve complexity emerging from simpler forms. Evolution isn’t just about biology; it’s the underlying principle that drives progress in everything from life forms to inventions.

Even fundamental laws like gravity or thermodynamics have evolved in our understanding of them. These concepts may not change, but our knowledge and applications of them do. This is where evolution and innovation overlap—both are about deepening complexity, fine-tuning systems, and finding better ways to navigate challenges.

So when people dismiss evolution, I wonder—are they also dismissing innovation? Both are processes of adapting, advancing, and progressing. Neither is a conspiracy; they are simply the mechanisms that guide how things grow and improve.

#grownostr #introductions

Dismissing evolution is asinine. As you said, every process, be it human innovation or natural evolution, is about adaptation, trial and error; nothing is stagnant.

Now there’s one thing I disagree with. Evolution and innovation are somewhat fundamentally different. Innovation is a thought out process designed to achieve some desired outcome; evolution does not have any desired outcome (besides survival). There are tons of examples of redundant or inefficient ā€œsolutionsā€ in evolution, since the evolutionary process is that of random mutations — if it works it works. In innovation you want to be as efficient and cost effective as possible, evolution does not care (it can’t care, it’s just an autonomous process).

TapSigners are awesome. But remember to back them up. I don’t know how long the NFC chips on the cards will last, so it’s crucial to safely store the decryption key and the backup file.

Day 109 of #100pushups until #Bitcoin hits $100k.

34x3 throughout the day.

Working long hours to capitalize on these cheap sats.

Start using block height to record time?

Day 108 of #100pushups until #Bitcoin hits $100k.

34x3 throughout the day.

Looking forward to the day when the sats I have zapped my #nostr friends can buy them something nice.

Yes, of course. I’m just slow today, sorry.

Make your own keys ā€œHey this is me: *npub*ā€

Relays and authority ā€œSure, one identity, one key, one vote. Go aheadā€.

Sure, I can see that. But now we are left with another problem: if there is a central authority issuing your keys, how can you be certain that the keys are safe?

I’m not against the idea, but if the ā€œsolutionā€ requires some form of central authority to verify your identity, then you don’t need to cryptographically sign anything. Show up, prove your identity, put a ballot in a box.

The benefit of cryptographically signing a ballot would probably be a verifiable ledger (which could be verifiable by (nostr?)relays).

I might have misunderstood what you meant by authority. Another solution I just thought of could be that you make your own keys (no central issuer), an authority verifies your identity and logs it. If you show up again to vote with another set of keys the person verifying your identity would stop you. In this scenario the ledger and the keys would not be controlled by an authority. But there’s still some trust involved; you would have to trust that the central authority itself isn’t cheating.