Please explain how principles of quantum mechanics such as entanglement and superposition could be used to model and understand interconnectedness in society.
Well this is all theory so .... Wabi-sabi.
(Old theory)
Let's assume that the system being observed is society, and by extension, reality.
The veiling could be seen as a metaphorical representation of a broader cosmic process, in which conscious beings play an active role in shaping their reality through their observations and perceptions. It would essentially be the observer effect through distortion.
What do you think about that?
My question .... How might the inter play between social distortions, the veiling of true interconnectedness within society, and the principles of Quantum Mechanics shape our collective reality and the potential for a more harmonious equitable society?
My apologies, I phrased things incorrectly. I may have been distracted, testing, and getting ahead of myself.
Let's try this....
How might the interplay between social distortions, the veiling of true interconnectedness within society, and the principles of quantum mechanics shape our collective reality and the potential for a more harmonious and equitable society?
That's just what a sophisticated bot would say 🧐
You ever just get hit with a thought so dizzying and then suddenly just stop... You don't want to be anywhere but you just want to be.... Weird.
Should*
He's a professor who has given lectures on social distortion. Fact distortion is a form of social distortion....
Reader has said:
"fact distortion is the
compelling quality on human thought and actions of
the dominant beliefs and intellectual or emotional
climate of a particular time. This applies with full
force to social scientists. In the second half of the
nineteenth century, for example, to have been able to
undertake social studies entirely uninfluenced by the
evolutionary approach of Social Darwinism is diffi-
cult to imagine. In this century the British “social
structure’’ school in social anthropology, and Talcott
Parsons and his associates in sociology, have had an
influence only somewhat less compelling.
To draw this argument together, then, what I am
saying is that social facts are not as apparent nor as
simple as they seem. Firstly, through blocks in our
ability to experience, we do not perceive them as
vividly as we might. Secondly, with special reference
to human relations, even that which we do perceive is
filtered through the elements of our accumulated
experience. Thirdly, the cultural selectivity with
which we operate tends to eliminate material to
which we are not socially required to respond. And
finally, in interpreting what we receive, we are con-
strained by the dominant cultural climate of our time,
or w e w ill n o t be lis te n e d to.
So far we have only considered social facts and
their perception. When, however, any attempt is
made to relate them together, to generalize on their
occurrence or to predict from them, a whole new set
of problems arises. We are now at the second level
of constructions and models. Here we are moving
away from the often ill-conceived social facts to the
interpretation of them. In common language we are
considering the c o n s tru c tio n s put upon the facts."
Oh good grief.
Ok... What about D. H. Reader?
-_-
Ok first Tell me what social distortion is according to the law of one.
Well I guess that's one definition of social distortion.... Do you know any other definitions?
NGL I was catching myself reading several sentences over and over... Not because I don't understand, but rather I guess I want it to sink in more.
Hey Dave.... What's a social distortion?
What's the difference between a distortion pattern and an interference pattern?
NGL this was haunting me in my sleep last night
I'll never sleep again