it was one thing to financially abuse me
but having children removed all apathy.
I don’t give a shit how difficult, I would rather die trying to clean up this mess than just let the mess be my children’s inheritance
particulars have nothing to do with the principle.
congratz! you used your rational faculty and recognized a universal principle!
i high bar to cross nowadays
by taking a reasonable position, and attaching it to some crazy sky daddy, you make a strawman
you don’t need a sky daddy to give a shit about people tearing the fabric of society apart
and if you have a sky daddy, that does not invalidate the giving a shit about society
you are a part of society, yes?
he is playing in the fiat hyper reality in his mind, not objective reality
happiness in his speculative fantasy is nothing more than subjective whims
when in reality, happiness is the subjective experience of fulfilling objective ends
for marriage in reality “for better or worse” are part of the journey to happiness
what’s the point of this mid-wit comment?
nothing necessarily means anything to some subjective interpretation of “happy”
it’s devoid of meaning, so you are emoting, but i don’t know what to make of this cry
are you in pain?
correct, people confuse principles with particulars.
it wouldn’t matter if you flipped all the data on the chart. the principle remains true, the flipped data would only mean the people in the study with 0 pre marital partners had other unfortunate vices that ruined their lives
correct, the data doesn’t matter.
but you conflate opinion with universal principle
the chart doesn’t matter.
a meta analysis of numerous studies is not needed to recognize the truth of principles.
so the principle is either way above your head, or you are denying it in some weird justification of a fiat worldview that nestled in your mind
this is the most mid-wit thing i’ve heard in awhile.
the x axis is “non marital sexual partners”
y axis is sexually actively 30+
so the only way the 0 group is sexually active is if it’s with their husband
if you have a bunch of sexual partners in your 20s, you have a harder road to have any sex in your 30s and beyond.
what’s ironic, is it literally doesn’t matter what “numbers” the chart says
the principle is objectively true for all human beings.
if someone can’t deal with reality, then they try convince themselves and. others to believe the fiat reality in their head
you mean lollipops and fancy pants won’t fill my life with meaning and joy?
the “paradox” is just a category error
He is wrong to say Aristole doesn’t answer, the “paradox” only occurs when u conflate act/potency
past does not exist any more
present is existence itself - to ask “how thick” is just as stupid as asking how long is an infinitely long stick.
future exists potentially- it’s not nothing
time is a measure which presupposes actual existence.
a layer 2
i don’t get the point, or understand why i’m looking at that
but i know its a display of talent
TLdR:
when governments print the money themselves, everytime in history, people know it’s bullshit and goes to zero.
the con is the dirty deal between the central bankers and the government.
the banks dress it up in jargon to give it the illusion of legitimacy, they get to keep monopoly power on interest running in every dollar in creation, and the government get unlimited funding
the government doesn’t print the money, The private non government entity Federal Reserve prints the money to buy the bonds from tbr government.
Read The Creature from Jeykll Island
i appreciate the immense skill in creating such art, but i don’t get it
quest for the dragon squat begins