Avatar
Libertarian Warrior ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐ŸŒพ๐Ÿฅฉ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅˆ
3abdaa4ff5cd3463d9dae05aa37bca364037fead809b3d34f8bcf97181331c6c
Private Investor | Libertarian | Anarcho Capitalist XMR tips: 85dCUZWbLaZcQDyyWCJS7DeMkGBeytdAVVzgMjns1AsNcTYiNu3kcVDccESYNGB6qUQzJpSvZiZZzYQrk3vA1qLvC15N9S6

Is flying still safe after the Covid scamdemic genocide? The hell it is - because of the compromised FAA!

American Pilot says they were all mandated to take the COVID 19 vaccines and boosters and now pilots are failing their EKG heart tests with irregular rhythms

๐Ÿšจ Instead of being safe, The FAA CHANGED REGULATIONS allowing for the new irregular heart rhythms (INSANE)

โ€œSo what the FAA has done is the FAA has increased the window in which the rhythm so that the pilots could pass so they could keep flying.โ€

โ€œI'm a pilot with the airlines and it's mandatory that we take the shot in order to keep flying.

So we took shot one, we took shot two, we took the booster one and at that point there was enough evidence from the medical examiners. There's enough evidence with the medical examiners that showed that there was a heart rhythm that wasn't there before the test.

So these DKGs that we have to take every six months, now we're causing problems with pilots being able to pass. So what the FAA has done is the FAA has increased the window in which the rhythm so that the pilots could pass so they could keep flying.โ€

https://t.me/worlddoctorsalliance/39215

It appears that this goes to prove that Big Pharma hates inconvenient truths that harm their profits. It appears it is NOT about your health but about THEIR profits and your health be DAMNED!

From David Avocado Wolfe on Telegram:

https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/172114

He proved unvaccinated kids were healthier. They revoked his license.

Dr. Paul Thomas studied 3,324 children and found unvaccinated kids had FEWER doctor visits and BETTER health outcomes.

Hereโ€™s what his data showed:

Fever โ€“ 9.1ร— higher in vaccinated

Ear Pain โ€“ 3.4ร— higher

Otitis Media (Ear Infections) โ€“ 2.9ร— higher

Conjunctivitis โ€“ 2.4ร— higher

Eye Disorders (Other) โ€“ 1.8ร— higher

Asthma โ€“ 5.2ร— higher

Allergic Rhinitis (Hay Fever) โ€“ 6.9ร— higher

Sinusitis โ€“ 4.3ร— higher

Breathing Issues โ€“ 2.9ร— higher

Anemia โ€“ 5.5ร— higher

Eczema โ€“ 4.5ร— higher

Urticaria (Hives) โ€“ 2.1ร— higher

Dermatitis โ€“ 1.4ร— higher

Behavioral Issues โ€“ 4.1ร— higher

Gastroenteritis โ€“ 4.7ร— higher

Weight/Eating Disorders โ€“ 2.5ร— higher

ADHD โ€“ 0 cases in unvaccinated group

Data based on how often children visited the doctor for each condition

Instead of investigating the findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomasโ€™s licenseโ€”just days after the study was published. Months later, the study was retracted.

Dr. Paul Thomas isnโ€™t the only one who faced swift punishment for publishing inconvenient science.

Other doctors have faced similar consequences for exposing the same pattern.

The question is: Why are doctors being punished simply for comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids?

Follow @VigilantFox ๐ŸฆŠ

More Stories: VigilantFox.com

โ€œNo one can get up much enthusiasm for a government which puts you in jail if you open your mouth.โ€ - George Orwell

"Today is 9/11.

A day that changed the world and us, forever. At the time, we were all swept up in the horror and the tragedy, shocked into silence by the collapsing towers, glued to the screens, unable to imagine that such an act could be anything other than what we were told it was.

But as the years have passed, the cracks in the official story have become impossible to ignore. 9/11 was not just a terror attack, it was one of the greatest psychological operations of modern history. A manufactured crisis to justify endless wars, mass surveillance, and a tightening of control over every aspect of our lives.

There is a pre-9/11 world and a post-9/11 world, just as there is a pre-COVID and a post-COVID world. Both were turning points, engineered to push humanity further into fear and compliance.

Back then, most of us fell for it. Who could imagine that such evil existed, that lives could be sacrificed on such a scale for political and geopolitical ends? And yet here we are, two decades later, with the truth coming out more clearly than ever.

The masterminds were not who we were told and 9/11 stands as proof of how far the real culprits are willing to go and how little regard they have for human life when it comes to furthering their agenda.

Let us honor the dead, not by repeating the lies that were told about the event, but by acknowledging that their loss became a spark that lit the fire of awareness for so many.

Never forget, not just what happened, but why it happened."

https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel

From the friend of humanity, Andrew Bridgen on Telegram.

Itโ€™s all there for anyone who has eyes to see. Our parliament is happy to sell us out to the unelected , unaccountable, non tax paying and immune from prosecution, World Health Organisation. A one world Government by the back door. Isnโ€™t it high treason?

https://t.me/ABridgen/1383

An excellent letter from Baroness Nicholson on the arrest of comedy writer, Graham Linchan, by five armed officers in the UK.

Dear Sir Mark,

I have read your thoughtful and illuminating statement on the arrest of comedy writer, Graham Linchan, by five armed officers on the grounds that his tweets might incite violence.

I abhor the attempt to scapegoat Parliament for the witless actions of your officers. I fear no amount of legislation could compensate for their apparent inability to exercise intelligent judgment. You say officers have "no choice but to record such incidents as crimes when they're reported. Then they are obliged to follow all lines of enquiry and take action as appropriate." Regrettably, Sir Mark, that is poppycock!

One of the cited tweets ended with "Punch them in the balls." Another ended with "Fuck em." Are they both to be taken literally as incitements to violence? Do you or your officers sincerely contend that "Fuck em" might be meant to cause anyone to engage in sexual intercourse (whether or not consensually)? Do your colleagues require Parliament to legislate on the meaning of "Fuck em" and whether or not it should be taken literally? In the meantime, must all reported incidents be recorded as a crime before anyone engages their adult brain?

I would hope your answer is "Obviously not," but I cannot be confident. If your officers can identify one phrase as not meant literally, surely they ought to be able to do that with the other and dismiss the complaint.

On this occasion the incidents were reported by former police constable Lynsay Watson; a transgender male dismissed for gross misconduct by Leicestershire Police as he waged a campaign of harassment against people with the legally protected belief that human beings cannot change sex. Your colleagues have allowed themselves to be exploited as tools in that continuing and orchestrated campaign

Watson has form. He has taken legal action against three police forces, the British Transport Police Federation, the Police Appeals Tribunal, the Ministry of Defence and sundry individuals who do not comply with his demands. Were your colleagues wary of being added to the list? Were they simply ignorant? Or are they, as you assert, mere automatons impelled to act unthinkingly once their buttons are pushed? Whatever the case, no depth of detail in a Policing with Common Sense Bill will solve the problem.

Instead of blaming Parliament for the inability of your officers to think for themselves intelligently, perhaps you might firmly tell them, please, to stop being stupid.

Yours sincerely,

Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne

A new Banksy has appeared outside the Royal Courts of (In)Justice [in London, UK] - it was very quickly covered and barriered off - the message is clear and accurate for those activist judges to ponder.

UK Labour sets up hate crime [speech that our treasonous traitorous government hates that exposes their crimes and treason] unit in response to โ€˜Operation Raise the Coloursโ€™

https://youtu.be/Vxus2gPcek0

Finally, some truth on climate!

The U.S. Department of Energy has just released a landmark report dismantling decades of climate propaganda. For once, instead of being told to blindly follow โ€œthe science,โ€ independent experts were brought in; John Christy, Judith Curry, Steve Koonin, Ross McKitrick, and Roy Spencer, all known for challenging the manufactured consensus.

Their findings?

โ€ข The economic impact of COโ‚‚ is far less harmful than the alarmists claim.

โ€ข Aggressive โ€œgreenโ€ policies may actually cause more damage than the climate itself.

โ€ข U.S. actions alone will barely move the needle on global climate.

โ€ข No evidence of increasing hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, or floods in U.S. records.

โ€ข COโ‚‚ has benefits too, including enhanced plant growth and greening.

This is a direct challenge to the climate cult. No wonder the establishment, media, and their pet scientists are furious, theyโ€™re already screaming about โ€œcherry pickingโ€ and โ€œfringe views.โ€ But the truth is breaking through.

The climate agenda has never been about saving the planet. It has been about control, fear, and the transfer of wealth and power. With this report, the mask slips further.

We must keep exposing the engineered hoax that has been used to justify carbon taxes, surveillance, digital IDs, land grabs, and restrictions on our way of life.

The tide is turning! ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

Full report:

https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2025-07/DOE_Critical_Review_of_Impacts_of_GHG_Emissions_on_the_US_Climate_July_2025.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel

Anyone know how to create a group with a shareable list on Nostr or what app to use? I am looking to share contact details of businesses.