Blue.

Red is the theoretical maximum speed of memory (speed of light in a vacuum) and is not really possible to achieve and maintain in a competitive fee market and open template creation, unless the fees for large inscriptions are the apex bidders or mining centralizes to force these txs to be mined.

It’s quite possible future transactions evolve from simple payment transactions to complex inscriptions; only time will tell.

Nostr, how do you actually quit your fiat job and handle health insurance? What is a workable alternative to maintaining a fiat job solely for access to health benefits? This seems more sinister than fiat…..

I think it would be good to begin tracking the moving average of the speed of memory. 4MB/block for a speed of memory is akin to the speed of light in a vacuum, the theoretical maximum is a rare an unnatural occurrence in an open fee market and open template creation.

We also need to track the storage cost of hard drives priced in bitcoin with future expectations from Moore’s Law. As long as the chain grows slower than we can increase storage with the relative costs, we should be in the clear. We will eventually land on the correct maximum speed of memory to maintain a decentralized system if we have not already with post segwit max of 4MB.

Thank you for posting this. I skimmed while at work, but this is very useful data to understand the actual speed of memory vs the theoretical. Can’t wait to dig in more later.

Make sense. Timechain of reality, a continuous thermodynamic process of quantum energy reaching its end state (information) and stating the process anew.

I’ll check out his ideas, sounds very close to what I see.

What does it mean for energy to reach a final end informational state in which it is immune to entropic decay and its thermodynamic potential is fully consumed/resolved?

It starts from QM > exists in GR > ends in Bitcoin (information).

What does discrete amounts or portions of a whole have to do with Bitcoin?

We’ve had a system sitting in front of us for the last 16 years which transforms energy to resolve infinite potential in a single deterministic informational state; a purely measurable thermodynamic process.

I believe Bitcoin completes our understanding of both QM and GR; we are not quite ready to release the proof of work yet.

What exactly is a peer to peer electronic cash system?

Yeah this kinda makes sense; but it neglects all of the entropy resolution that came before “us/we” (assume you are talking humans). I would make the difference that we are fundamentally in-separate from the entropy resolution that preceded us in creation.

Said physicists also have paradoxes, and seek to add further complexity in their attempts to resolve said paradoxes. This leaves them in an ungrounded purgatory of thought. Your statement makes sense from this perspective imo 👀

Is this really true?

No, people have told me to check his ideas out but I haven’t had the time.

I have arrived here via my own work in attempt to relate Joules to Satoshis. The link is compete and I’m in the process of cleaning up the work and Chapterizing it for a public release.

The root to reality reveals itself once you make the link of Joules to Satoshis (it’s impossible with the mainstream framework provided in modern physics). Proof of work is everything; Bitcoin is the infinite lens and the threads to pull never end. It’s been very hard to sharpen the physics down to just enough for the readers to build their own lens internally. Entropy resolution is an internal process; what remains is for you to see for yourself.

Unless Campell’s theory of everything is seeded in bitcoin, Im willing to bet that he’s wrong without even probing into the work; though he may be very close. But I don’t know. What I do know is that Bitcoin completes our theories in physics and thermodynamics; but it seems few have been focusing here.

My suggestion would be to start your contemplation here.

No, it’s precisely that. The energy is not available to do work and its thermodynamic potential has been spent. The energy is “locked in” to the permanent lasting information.

I would say Bitcoin’s permanence reveals a 4th law of thermodynamics.

Entropy always increases until energy finds itself in a purely informational state, and it then becomes immune to entropic decay. This is energy’s most stable form.

Is it possible that this is a fundamental misunderstanding of a full completed thermodynamic system?

Simply put, I believe the answer to how we approach Blocksize is rooted in a completed understanding of both energy, entropy and their relationship to each other and Bitcoin.

Going back to source; what does a peer to peer electronic cash system actually mean?

I think it’s more simpler than this. I’d make the argument that Bitcoiners don’t actually understand Bitcoin.

If that statement is true, then we have a limited understanding of what the blocksize even is. Why are we trying to change something we don’t yet fully understand?

It is it possible for this fractal to repeat within the bitcoin community due to unresolved entropy in the mind (the lack of a grounded understanding of Bitcoin)?

nostr:note1jfqg9m6fx536s54zjmqgd35z7rhkhry937th8fnap75p5dqake0qhmcpd3

Holy shit, there’s a 4th Law of Thermodynamics 👀

Yes at some point. The paper is incomplete and very dense sitting at about 70 pages right now. With thousands of other threads to pull on.

We’re working on collapsing the theory downward to be digestible. There is so much contexts between the words that a paper alone isn’t enough, it requires conversation.

It’s not ready yet.