There's no scientifically valid reasoning behind plain water as a fuel, hence his death is merely an unlucky coincidence (R.I.P.)
That's a conspiracy theory right there: actually none of the conspiracy theories turned out to be true.
I've seen on your profile picture what you do to your alien friends ðĪŠ
what happened to her?
or is it "will never see daylight agsin"? anyways, he's fucked
i thought it was called #religion
get in line, conform, concede
someone zapped me! thanks!
Thank you! At least we can agree on the first sentence.
just listen to real virologist and what they come up with in scientific consensus; no use reading scientific papers as a layman (you cannot and will not understand any of it)
Also a theoretical physicist now?
It's rich that you think you can dismiss one of the most well-established and experimentally confirmed theories in physics with an uninformed declaration 'relativity of any kind also does not exist', clearly shows that you do not realize that only a select few possess the intellectual capacity to grasp the complexities of Einstein's theory of relativity. In fact, your statement is a perfect example of the Dunning-Kruger effect, where someone with limited knowledge and understanding overestimates their own abilities and dismisses the expertise of others.
It seems like we're both of pitbullish nature. You have apparently reached a point of grandiose delusion. The "fight" that was supposedly "won years ago" is likely a reference to some illusory victory in the world of cryptocurrency or conspiracy theories. It all reeks of a self-delusional triumphalism, with you implying you're part of a select group that has access to secret knowledge or information that others do not. The condescending tone and vague references to "bitcoin" and "Q" only add to the sense of detachment from reality.
It seems like we're dealing with a case of ideological tunnel vision here. Repeatedly ignoring or downplaying the complexities of financial crimes and regulations, while simultaneously accusing others of being "fooled" or "enslaved", suggests a lack of self-awareness and critical thinking. It's almost as if you're stuck in a feedback loop of confirmation bias, where you're only willing to consider information that reinforces your pre-existing views, while dismissing or distorting anything that challenges them. Intelligence (read I.Q.) is not just about having strong opinions, but also about being able to recognize and adapt to new information and perspectives.
That's a staggering display of moral relativism. Ignoring the concept of illicit funds and money laundering doesn't make them disappear. Stolen funds are not just "funds" â they're the proceeds of crime, and enabling their concealment and use only perpetuates harm. Your simplistic solution of "taking it back" ignores the complexity of financial crimes and the need for regulations to prevent them.