Don’t have a specific one to recommend, but googling “bind authorative server” should turn things up.
Curious about this new BIP 353/Human Readable Names thing but don’t have a wallet that supports it yet? Want to see if you set it up right?
Head over to https://satsto.me/ to resolve them to legacy addresses!
It’s not just BOLT12, either, any reusable bitcoin addresses can go in there (but preferably ones that don’t cause on-chain address reuse)!
Yes, but at what point do the performance issues start?
I was reading through this forum discussing around 50 million records on a domain (assuming we get to a point where a successful lightnin wallet provider/implementation gets to at least 50 million users) .
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.protocols.dns.bind/c/6InK8Qs8R2s
I have seen no performance issues hosting a few million records on RPis for https://bitcoinheaders.net/
But, BIP 353 does contemplate doing multiple users in a single wildcard record.
i dunno. nostr:npub185h9z5yxn8uc7retm0n6gkm88358lejzparxms5kmy9epr236k2qcswrdp do you know? this google article says most domains only allow a max of 49 TXT records. won't Phoenix have a problem once too many addresses are created on their domain?
There’s absolutely no limit. Some hosting providers add arbitrary limits but even the entire Bitcoin header tree in DNS records running in BIND is like 1G of memory…
That’s a technical/encoding detail that’s not really relevant. In practice a TXT record is a blob of data. Whether it’s encoded as multiple blobs or not doesn’t matter, things work just fine :)
Why not just go the LNDK route and use the LDK BOLT12/onion message code (which is usable directly without the rest)?
If you think the American Red Team are pro-freedom and the American Blue Team are anti-freedom you may want to get checked for brain worms. Neither is even remotely close to that consistent and both are pro- or anti-freedom on various specific issues. Bitcoin can absolutely speak to both of the American partisan teams depending on which features and groups of people you focus on.
Suggesting that Liberals (not liberals) have nothing to like about Bitcoin is short-sighted and lacks creativity. There have been literal books written on this topic.
Absolutely without question. The worst thing for bitcoin is that it continues to be more and more a partisan issue. nostr:note1umdxxs2gyrfypyzkyfv2m9zgk87jlgmn9uua8xvf7t7zgf8e0mzsj46rz2
Ah, yea, okay, .xyz gets used by spammers a *ton* so I think they did this to fix their spam problem (lots of people just block *.xyz these days), but what a terrible idea…
When in doubt, use .org for infra domains, always.
Oh wild, seems that registry is super obnoxious. 🤦♂️
PSA: The functionality of multiple Fedimint federations is significantly degraded due to severe DNS issues.
It seems to be the case that some federation guardians have an XYZ domain that the DNS registrar has taken over. Freedom One and Bitcoin Principals appear to have one guardian offline due to this.
Unfortunately, despite the server and keys for these guardians being intact, there is no way for the DNS of a guardian to be swapped out after the fact. We became aware of this issue last week and then became aware that multiple federations are experiencing this: https://github.com/fedimint/fedimint/issues/5482/
Given the critical state of these federations, with one guardian out of four being permanently offline, it's essential that if you have funds in these federations, you should withdraw them immediately. Unfortunately, we're unaware of other public federations, so you must withdraw to another lightning or on-chain wallet.
From our experiences, intermittent/connectivity issues can occur with guardians, and this may result in errors if not all three remaining guardians are consistently online. No other guardian of these federations has XYZ or other domains like it. So, if you're having issues, please try again later.
Unfortunately, not much can be done on the Mutiny side, so we're removing the federation setup flow in the UI as a first step. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Is there any more info available here? I’m somewhat surprised to hear (and Google doesn’t seem to have any results for) a TLD seizing a domain outright. I could see a shitty registrar (GoDaddy or whatever) doing so, however.
Shouldn’t really be a huge deal? The node will just connect outbound from a new IP instead.
Y’all don’t deserve a bull market
We covered a lot! 2.5hrs of Poelstra, nostr:npub1emdtsxly9m68m00x206t574jttp65vk0c2m89ms038q047yz7ylqcac9aw and nostr:npub1mxrssnzg8y9zjr6a9g6xqwhxfa23xlvmftluakxqatsrp6ez9gjssu0htc . We exhausted all the parts we could, steel man, straw man, alternatives, status quo, activation, etc,.. hope to get this out tomorrow.
Nostr has the best questions contributed.
nostr:note1u2y79dfrykpmjvjurnffl2eamay28pl9lrssea55a53yy2gnn09s5zhxvm
Sooo…no one who isn’t super pro-OP_CAT?
It’s always how slow CI is, but somehow when I run it on an RPi it still never fails. I struggle to understand where GitHub gets machines as slow as Actions runners, but I guess we get what we pay for.