Yes, stack sats and try to get Bitcoin embedded into your own economy, so that politicians look like killjoys for banning it. Popularize it.

I can actually see this happening, in Germany, so I am still hopeful.

We’re going to embed bitcoin into every layer of our financial markets and then soft default on the rest of the world via money printing. The solution if you’re outside America? Own Bitcoin and hopefully be someplace where the government won’t take it from you.

Whoops. Glad the S&P500 isn’t my savings account

What’s all this buzz about deepseek? Is it really that good?

I’ll do more tests on this deepshit thing but it feels like a chinese propaganda, unless they’ve discovered new laws of thermodynamics that we didn’t know about.

If deepseek teaches you one thing about markets, it should be this:

Centralization actually provides a spark to innovation - as the free market of millions of ideas in people’s heads outcompete bureaucracy and the old way of doing things.

Ying and yang - and the entire ecosystem building on #Bitcoin is a response to that centralization of power and manipulation.

And we’re so early.

We should “almost” be grateful to it for the opportunity.

And gm!

Finally, my life’s work is complete. #Bitcoin

That's the main reason Monero has tail emission.

Not because Monero Bros love inflation so much.

If a hot woman messages you about #Bitcoin, ignore him.

One of the crazy things about AI and robotics is that in the year 2025, most people still don't use Roombas or other robotic vacuum cleaners.

They're useful in many contexts, but they're not clearly better across most metrics than a human with a vacuum cleaner yet. They've been out for a very long time, gradually improving. And that's one *very specific* task with pretty clear visualization requirements and floor mobility requirements and pretty low safety thresholds with high repetition levels, and yet that market isn't dominated by robotics yet.

That's an example of why I continue to view white collar computer-work AI as being *way* ahead of in-the-field blue collar robotic AI in terms of competing with human jobs.

The moment where it's a joke to buy a human-powered vacuum instead of a robot vacuum, rather than a debatable trade-off, is kind of the canary in the coal mine moment for consumer robotics. We can't even nail that yet, but once we do, it's kind of a floodgate moment, considering how long that task has been in the works for, and it will probably quickly expand to other areas following that moment.

That's kind of my basic test for robot hype. Yes, they're getting better and better. Yes, they do backflips now. Yes, it's a big deal. But in-the-field blue collar skilled work is a really high bar, and we haven't fully cleared the "vacuum carpeted areas of the same house floor area over and over" stage of that yet.

Everything is kind of hype until that stage is fully breached. Then it's off to the races.

What's your view of that heuristic?

I wouldn’t trust this dude as far as I could throw him. He’s a charlatan con man and chasing power and wealth in my opinion. Yes AI is a useful tool but in the wrong hands it will be used to control society.

#memestr

Good point. Big if true

what about a beer market

Everything is better in a bear market except the price.

Everything is worse in a bull market except the price.