Nip-05 providers made sense in the beginning when it was the cool new thing and everyone wanted to try it. But get your point now. I could see every client maintaining a list of "rubber-stamp verifiers" and simply not displaying the identifier for them. Could be a bit like Whac-A-Mole though...
Just think it would be a bummer to not let people tie their identity to a domain they own...
Afaik only this lnbits extension:
A nip-15 tab would be very interesting!
Which relay implementation are ya using?
I love nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s and all his work to lead Nostr into the huge ecosystem we have today.
However, he is wrong about NIP-94.
NIP-94 was discussed for 2 months, agreed and merged. Amethyst is just implementing the consensus. I am not the one going sideways to implement my own way of doing things.

#[0]
You're a gem
Evan say "this is complicated"
Hey damus friends, #[0] says he can't change the zap amount. How does he do that?
I just want you to know, whenever I point out a bug I'm just super psyched I'm in on the experiment. You're. Killing it. I often spend half an hour looking for the bug, you're, just way quicker.... 😁





