这个傻X最大的脑残问题在于他不知道什么叫成功，什么叫失败！不然也不会轮落到到处教人怎么跪舔！因为每个人想要的东西不样，这是这个傻X能总结的？
这个傻X应该先录一集什么叫家庭，再做这个视频比较合理！
都要有家庭的话，那些没家庭的人难道不活了？ 真他妈的好笑！
Period! nostr:note1nesplm93f5c2yguswj3guw9amgrwfgwrecw6cwqsun35nz3h009q6chdla
我很期待在新一轮s的“跑得快”中各位的速度！
噢， 顺便说一下，各们大神，不论你是以公司，机构，或是个人，
善意的提醒下你们都算算自己的帐吧！👍
你们都是高手！实在是高！👍
这个傻X要真是那么厉害的话，我那就他妈奇怪了，怎么中国就没有像样点的企业家能拿得出手呢？这他妈不好笑吗？还是说我的笑点太低了？
看了太多这个傻X的视频，他有明显的脑回路问题。
圈层不是你说换就换，问题的关键在于 你是否有真本事吸引对的圈层找上你，而不是像这个傻X一味的去跪舔。
那些把这种傻X封神的精英们，我只能说这也是为什么你只能是今天这样！
“你”把自己所有的后路都堵死了！
永远没我什么事了！“你” 好样的！ 👍
You ALL put me on rest, thanks a lot sincerely! nostr:note1ete2m3w06sujq6we4pacn7g5gyaql3wstqjjlu743flz5tql5gksyx3mzt
Btw, do you ALL know why I like “Barefoot”?
Because poor people have less to lose than rich people. Period!
👍
Since some Real idiots like Warren Buffett like being a teacher, I don’t see a point for me one of The Real Intelligent persons to lecture you Politicians one important lesson.
Real Successful (I mean solid expertise not bullshit money numbers) Businessman is always the one who stays far away from Politics. I cannot explain to you why, but I will give YOU all clue to testify. (There are many REAL ones, gramma structure habit)
Please review the business performance (FOR REAL results) under leaderships such as Warren Buffet, Jamie Dimon, Larry Fink, Jack Ma, etc whoever close to politics.
Btw thanks you all teach me the dark side of human being, though I still remain my boundaries standard.
Everyone will see the results some point some time.
Funny is all I can say!
很多人都知道《三国》也很多人都看过《三国》
可是《三国》到底讲的是什么？
我其实也很好奇。👍
Regarding to topics of Network and Being Rich
The main problem here are
1. What Network used for?
2. Does ALL want to be rich? To further extent being rich for what?
💺 ☕️ 🍿
PERIOD!
So easy? Absolutely! Couldn’t agree more than that.
Finally I accept one truth that at some points people just purely enjoy digging holes.
Nothing wrong with that since everyone has right to choose whatever he likes.
Letting go and enjoying show without any more emotional flow is the best thing to do as long as possible.
