immediate punishment at the first sign of refusal.
There is a place and time for self determination and independent thinking. Sadly that place and time is not in front of your parents when you're three.
Giving chances and being lenient just teaches him that you really aren't serious about anything until you get mad about it and act.
Things get alot easier when they know you always mean business.
To clarify to the weirdos out there : I'm not talking about pain compliance. I'm talking about either removal of dopamine inducing items (toys and TV) or temporary restrictions on movements (time outs).
there is no red
there is no blue
there is the state
and there is you
fix the money, save the world
covid 19 : the great reset
Thought experiment:
You have a constitutional law that says : any vote in parliament (or house or whatever) is subject to a 15% popular veto. Meaning any 15% of the population can strike down any law as an added condition for votes.
This would result in very limited government after a while. The obly things that would pass would be lateral adjustments that everyone thinks are needed.
From that point we extrapolate to the current situation where the population has a 0% veto on any vote. That means that government has the freedom to expand because they get to burden future governments with long term liabilities.
So what we can conclude is that voting does nothing but involving yourself in the political process via say : lobbying and representatives in both the bureaucracy and elected officials does ALOT with few ressources.
Involvement is thus a moral duty for Brave bitcoiners.
i ain't got much to say, it's so peaceful here
working through CLRS and Discrete math part time. Ill be ready to contribute at some point lol.
I'm so sorry to have a time preference that is limited to my own lifetime..... I guess I should accept that everything goes to shit and hope for things to get better after I die ......
If you're not subscribed, you are failing your duty as a bitcoiner to be educated on the important aspects of the protocol.
Bunch of wrong assumptions here :
I said more bitcoiners not more ETF holders. More bitcoiners is by definition more decentralization.
Privacy solutions do not necessarily entail supply cap obfuscation. For example : coinjoin, payjoin etc...
What principle stops you from trading your convictions ?
https://x.com/chrisblec/status/1795109325863596240 tHiS iS bad . We must force a change and introduce risk! For the poors!
Well there are important points to consider.
Having more bitcoiners is better than having less. Why ? Because it prevents all kinds of nasty social attacks in meat space. And some violent ones too.
Also, not having privacy ends up taking censorship resistance out of bitcoin.
So like, I understand the carefulness to improve the protocol, but "pure store of value" ends up being "pure pile of shit".
Do you have a protocol name for this operation yet good sir ?
If I may suggest, I think this should be called Mind Goblin !
i don't have twotter, what are the comments like ?
at that level there will be indeed a lot of fixing.... maybe not the kind you want.
Is that mail order prostitutes?
what is it about ?
Proud retard here. I completely agree.
I'm sick and tired of people smarter than me explaining something and ending up being wrong.
I'd rather take my chances on red rather than get fleeced through an elaborate scheme in poker.