So far the Egyptians (both the military and the civilian population) are resisting his threats. I think people underestimate Egypt a lot. Recently “trump” cut off foreign aid to all countries except to the zionist state and Egypt. The Americans are trying to bribe Egypt where they don’t want them attacking the zionist state.

In the case of Jordan, I don’t think Jordan wants the Palestinians to come to Jordan, at the same time, are the Jordanians capable of resisting the Americans?

If you believe that fiat currency isn't valid money, you believe that engaging in interest transactions in fiat currency is not riba.

"THE CONVERGENCE BETWEEN FEMINISM AND WHITE NATIONALISM"

"I came across a post claiming that a lot of white nationalists liked 'RFH'. I did wonder why especially when she was a radical feminist. Yet someone told me that a lot of white nationalists liked her critiques on non-white men. They disliked that she extended the critique upon white men. If you haven't noticed there are a lot of similarities between how white nationalists talk about non-white men and how feminists talk about men in general. 'Non-white men are violent'. 'Non-white men are rapists'. 'Non-white man oppress their women'. If you really notice what white nationalists really say, a lot of the racism they espouse is really directed at mainly non-white men. Even with the recent rise of racism against 'indians', majority of it is directed at 'indian' men and not at 'indian' women (I've seen cases of racism against 'indian' women). Even the 'they are taking our jobs' narrative is directed at non-white men who are engaging in cheap labour. In other words, it's not really surprising when you see feminists and white-nationalists collaborating with each other especially when they have similar views of non-white men."

Hmm…I don’t think I’ve seen turkish restraunts sell these types of food.

*do you know any other "mainstream" accounts that have come on here?

Do you any other "mainstream" accounts that have come on here?

If he wants to invade panama, mexico, greenland and canada, it's probable that the americans get less involved in middle east, africa and asia.

"TECHNOLOGY AND PHENOMENOLOGY"

"Have you ever wondered what you felt online isn't the same what you felt offline? I remember quite a while ago that I visited a reddit in dealing with pornographic addiction where there are people who like the experience of watching a specific pornographic fetish whilst in reality it's not something they INSTINCTIVELY even consider. The pornographic industry was one of the industry that went through massive technological changes where it shifted from CDs hidden away to now pornography being widespread where it's now difficult to hide it from children (who were given ipads by the lazy ones). The pornography industry is one of the first 'transhumanist' industry where it seeks to imitate the sexual pleasure of sexual intercourse where it uses algorithms and imagery to 'imitate' reality via technology. The pornographic industry attempts wants to turn the mechanical to become like an 'organism' where it uses the videos of young women having sex with another man. The man sees the woman twerking in a video. He's pleased with it. Yet when he saw it in real life, he was disgusted. Why is there such a gap between the two? One of the differences is that the man undergone two different experiences. One involved watching a video of a thing whilst the other involved watching the actual thing. The transhumanist tries to get the mechanical object to function 'similarly' to an organism yet it cannot become an organism, whilst the organism continues to function as usual. Meaning there is a barrier between the organism and the mechanical. In other words the interaction the mechanical that is 'similar' to the organism is not the same as the interaction with the real organism. Now what does this mean? One of the limits of technology is that it cannot transform the experience you have with technic (that imitates the real thing) as the same as the experience you have with the real thing. Even with the widespread use of pornography it has not impeded the male desire for a real women. What pornographic industries did with technology was that it tried to nudge the consumer to different experiences. 'Bored with one sexual fetish? Have you tried this one?'. In other words technology could be used to nudge human beings into interacting with other things which leads to different experiences."

On a podcast, Riaz Hussain talked about "generative A.I."(chatgtp etc)

Riaz Hassan: "...people think it understands language but it really doesn't, it just understands statistics."

."

**Liberalism and Contracts**

"One of the misunderstandings some people have of liberalism is that liberals believe in an arbitrary form of freedom similar to how anarchists view freedom. Hegel (who believed freedom was important) he believed that there was a contradiction between an arbitrary form of freedom and the law. Hegel believed that the modern state is the reconciliation between freedom and the law. Liberals adopted the hegelian view of the modern state whilst they pushed "social contract theory" which was promoted by John Locke. Liberals believe there is social contract between the citizens and the modern state where they believe the modern state provides them some forms of freedom in exchange for their affirmation of the modern state's monopoly to commit violence. Liberals understood that the modern state did prevent the freedoms of people to an extent. Quite interestingly that John Locke was no fan of atheists where he believed atheists aren't to be trusted to uphold an agreement. In other words, liberals do strongly believe in some forms of contracts. Now you might be wondering which liberal talks about contracts. Have you heard of a liberal talking about "consent"? If you've realised that the liberal believes in a contract between the citizens and the modern nation-state, you've probably realised that the major difference between the muslim and the liberal is over who is the legislator. The muslim believes god is the sole legislator. The liberal believes the modern state is the legislator."

a

Try to get more to come.

Focus on iris nostr for now.

I don't want to get it to become too complicated.

Someone famous needs to come on nostr.

Kick got famous after adin ross came to kick.

Rumble got famous after andrew tate went on rumble.

Telegram got famous after twitter pursued their censorship policy.

Interesting site. Anyone interested?