We’ll need plenty of warm ₿lankets and hot soup ready for these plebs coming in from the Ottman/Rogan purple pilling. 🧔🧔‍♀️🦶🥣

#zaps

#nostr

#plebchain

Baby camel 🥹🤍

am I dreaming?

Gonna settle in for the night and relax. Early morning shift for the mines 🫡

Appreciate you all and see you tomorrow

🤜🤍🤛

Stay humble. Stay kind 🙏

I feel like I’ve been away too long. Missed this place.

💜😢

I have all daughters….I must say HS girls softball rocks.

Sup

do we need copy JSON?

Indeed, I certainly agree here. But I'm still trying to figure out why others who should get it, dont... lol

Help me with this #Plebchain. I have spoken with the “very smart people" at several FAAAT companies (FB, APPL, AMZN, Alphabet, TLSA – it’s a much better acronym that I’ve been pushing in the hopes in catches on...) who have argued that there is something unfair about bitcoin's holdership distribution - particularly the progressively massive rewards captured by earlier adopters.

Yet when I say "Ok, let say that’s true, then wouldn't that also be true for say, your FAAAT stock? Would you be amenable to redistributing your stock shares to everyone in the world more equally?"

The answer, of course and unsurprisingly, is always and hasty and indignant “No.” Then, they’ll make appeals to how long they had to stay at the company, how hard they had to work, or even the difficulty and rigor of the schooling that afforded them the chance to compete for the job at the company as justification for why such redistribution would be unconscionable.

After that, I usually just tilt my head and give them a hard stare to see if they get it. Most of them don’t. So what gives? Here we have people who know firsthand the benefits of reward from taking early, successful risk and tout it as a near-divine societal imperative. Yet when you suggest that there may those out there reaping greater rewards, by persevering through a more successful risk dynamic, while conceivably “doing less,” something is suddenly unfair and the curve needs to be smoothed out? What is this?

This always strikes me has the most bizarre sort of Socialist thinking…interested in yall’s thoughts here.

#Bitcoin

There are 21 million Bitcoin total, and 8 billion people that will some day have a need or want to save a portion of their wealth in Bitcoin. That’s only 262.5k sats out there if evenly distributed!

BUT…Since most sats are illiquid at this point, the available supply of 2.7M BTC on exchange means most people won’t even own 35k sats over their entire lifetimes.

Stay humble, stack sats!