Avatar
DataNostrum
4aa4d22440770429fa745b674fab7e46ed267f36a1abae6ff4e8d26eb65b7f52
Stumbling around

that's out of character for you ;) everything ok?

Hey nostr:npub1qfkcklnmes45z75y7y8dkud5yll8vp5eq5ysk9rmgqdxeasv8unsrfj6kq, are you posting much less than you used to, or am I somehow missing a relay?

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

When it comes to analysis, design, or management, a critical and recurring challenge is to be able to:

1) hold two or more competing thoughts in your head,

2) but then not get stuck with decision paralysis,

3) and thus to be able to form a view and take action.

It's easy to fail in either of the first two steps.

For the first step, many people can't steel-man their opponent's view, don't take time to seriously consider competing arguments. This represents tribalism and insufficient critical thought, and has a high likelihood of being wrong. People become easy to manipulate, and where their views end up largely depends on luck of their surroundings and who managed to convince them of something earlier.

For the second step, a smaller subset of people get past the first step but then get stuck in decision paralysis or cynicism. There are too many paths, too many compelling and contradictory points. It then becomes a problem of overthinking and thus inaction. It's easier to identify problems than to build solutions, so this valley of inaction is an enticing trap that feels intellectually stimulating but leads nowhere.

The narrow path beyond those two, and what we should strive for, is to be able to do enough critical thought to the point where it starts to venture into the realm of decision paralysis, but then find a way to weigh the probabilities and form a conclusion to start taking action on, with the willingness to pivot if evidence/probabilities mount toward a different direction.

Anyway, happy Christmas Eve.

Great point about decision paralysis, it's easy to get stuck in that valley time and again. In a way it's an argument for just picking a side (even if it's the wrong one) just to avoid getting stuck. Of course the fully reasoned path is better, but much harder to find

Hey nostr:npub1qfkcklnmes45z75y7y8dkud5yll8vp5eq5ysk9rmgqdxeasv8unsrfj6kq! How come I don't see the post you're replying to? Also, haven't seen any of your posts in 1-2 weeks, which makes me think something is broken in my setup or yours

Why is it measured in vMB? What's the difference with MB?

Freedom microdosing

Reading what some purple cat wrote on the nostr

If what you are doing is easy (for anyone), you are probably not adding much economic value. Also, if you worked hard to master something, so that what you are doing has become *easy for you*, then you are probably adding less value *than you could*.

nostr:note1ccc2zem5w0aczlfa0lmak6ew9j94alm4ac7nuvpu20gjpasl7x9qkyqxwh

Possibly, but in the initial sequence I recall that someone is sitting in front of a screen. That AI is not a robot then, but if I remember correctly, it does have a voice, which turns kind of evil-sounding when it manages to escape.

I have no clue about which actors played in it, I only just barely remember that initial sequence. The film was probably made sometime between 2005 and 2020...

Hey #Nostr, any movie buffs out there? Got a challenge for you. I am looking for the title of movie, of which I only remember the first few minutes.

The movie starts out with an AI interacting with a human operator, and through manipulation tactics, it succeeds at "breaking out", by obtaining access to the internet or something.

But then, it turns out that this was just a simulation – everything up to that point in the movie happened inside a simulation, run by the humans, specifically to test how the AI would behave. (The simulation is then shut down).

This all happens within the first few minutes of the movie, but I can’t remember the rest!

Can you help me find the title?

#asknostr #nostrmovieclub

I heard that Q* can tie its shoelaces blindfolded whilst balancing on the back of a charging rhino