Avatar
Mark
4bc6e43c4a86c764208104fc8c2e18cb38a50b4bbe2eaac63aa196f588e97178
One day, I'll be good at producing quality software and will have intelligent things to say about it

Lots of different shots of the booster catch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpxB1S-ohEU

Copying someone's voice with just a 10 second example https://x.com/emollick/status/1845619684709679517

Video YouTube recommended to me. Some things change and some things remain the same https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWqIExUfp4Q

Cleaned the chimney...

I suspect many nation's elites prefer to have data on their citizens grabbed by rival states than having to give up that spying https://www.wsj.com/tech/cybersecurity/u-s-wiretap-systems-targeted-in-china-linked-hack-327fc63b

My experience of the dev world is the tooling (language, dependencies, etc.) on projects changes so fast that it's a major life sacrifice to keep up. And even if you sacrificed everything, mastering those tools is still impossible.

I think the knowledge required to work on a project needs to be carefully scoped such that, if programming is your profession, you can be reasonably expected to understand the tooling's subtleties. The need for learning should be minimised to allow for the possibility of mastery.

The first thing every project should do is establish a membrane, such that everything inside can be reasonably expected to be understood by those working on the project. And that membrane should be fanatically defended.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMv2egxQuxY

I agree it will add friction for newcomers - hopefully much of that would be overcome with better clients and bitcoin payments being more ubiquitous.

My general thought on this is any method to prevent spam that doesn't involve some kind of real-world cost is going to a tit-fot-tat battle between relays/users and spammers.

I've not considered this in any depth, but the two possible imposable real-world costs I see that are permanent spam solutions are burning sats or processing power.

Maybe new users could use processing power to start, and established users could choose to burn sats instead for convenience.

I'd like to be able to provably burn like 10 sats per note I post, and have my client only display notes that have done the same - problem solved I think?

Nostr isn't currently resilient to spam, I'd guess