101 on how gold was confiscated:

You had to turn it in for dollars by a deadline prior to dollar devaluation, and there were massive prison consequences for not turning it in, but little resources in terms of investigating who didn’t turn it in. That would be expensive. So it was fear based. Focusing on illegality and tail risks on edge cases more than enforcement on average.

Institutions had to comply immediately, since it’s all visible. So the government broke liquidity in the domestic gold market, which was enough for their purposes. Gold became a hard-to-trade illegal relic for those that held it.

If a small family hodled some extra bars for 40 years until it became legal again, they did okay.

But can the government track bitcoin in the 2020s better or worse than gold in 1930s for enforcement purposes? That’s the right question.

And don’t just think of confiscation. Think of 70% selective taxes and things like that. Far more within the current rule of law. That’s the sophisticated approach. Don’t take it. Selectively tax it by a lot.

Those are the politics to push against from a bitcoin perspective.

Join us on Tuesday at 7pm for #Bitcoin 101, our beginners Bitcoin class covering the basics of seed phrases, self-custody, and privacy. Open to all.

#london #bitcoin #nostr #plebchain

This is the last and BIGGEST #bitcoin beggar

And that’s it I give up on this horrible yet amazing example of #bitcoin and the bitcoin community

Please pay for my dinner?

I WANT TO CALL YOU IF SO AS PART OF THIS VIDEO EXPERIMENT 🔥

Just orange pilled my homie.

Send him some sats and spread the love.

poorestmaraca41@walletofsatoshi.com

Awards Evening last night. Head mentioned Bitcoin Diploma in front of 200 parents. Just waiting for a little price action before launch.

Amethyst?

Amethyst

is there anything else?

Look at how stupid media people are thinking Peter Todd is Satoshi.

Now apply that to everything else they report on.