Of course
The only reason this worked was those websites didnât pin a version of that dependency and loaded the latest one always nostr:note1x5y3gvrvs8dy6v8d4fft237snpr9f4lrfds3l766nrq7dd2ch7ys67cs4u
The problem is that the current state of Nostr media makes it impossible for services to optimize without making someone mad.
Clients should signal what they need (data saving preference, rough resolution, intent such as to view up close/save or just timeline) and servers should provide that. Servers should also be able to optimize however as long as the original can be requested
Some media services do optimizations differently based off of client also. And re-optimizing images.
My personal opinion is that we also need a hash that reflects the overall content of the image roughly, and a way to signal to image services âreturn original optimized versionâ in case of things like a zoomed up view or doubt about content integrity.
You also need to consider optimizations by media services
That is pretty common
Due to interleaving and similar you already mostly achieve that
You want real workloads
Write a memory test program that stores 4092 bytes and a CRC
It is supported but not âvalidatedâ (donât blame us if it doesnât work) for consumer platforms
It is detected as ECC too.
G series CPUs donât support it donât ask how I know (tried to add ECC RAM to a system with one) and it didnât detect as ECC
I have bought 2 random ASUS boards, one meant for âprofessional useâ and one meant to be lower end (B)
Both work
another water heater⌠:)
gonna have to setup a server rack in my house nostr:npub1q3sle0kvfsehgsuexttt3ugjd8xdklxfwwkh559wxckmzddywnws6cd26p
ryzen supports ecc
A Bitcoin node will detect bugs in the matrix
since I'm not seeing any serious memory or disk issues, and assuming there are no bugs in bitcoin-core, I wonder if my bitcoin node is getting hit by cosmic rays and bits are getting flipped every now and then, leading to leveldb checksum errors.
I looked into ECC ram but I may need to build a home server, since it's not common in desktops motherboards.
Is this is why youâve been going on about ecc memory nostr:npub12262qa4uhw7u8gdwlgmntqtv7aye8vdcmvszkqwgs0zchel6mz7s6cgrkj ? I found a post about it from greg maxwell 10 years ago as well, saying all his non-laptop machines use ecc memory:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2jpk54/risks_of_running_bitcoin_client_on_a_computer/cle3qyb/ nostr:note1ktns7scrqr00h9a400eajn8k23hcxzzp35syfr7j4tvzjkdpjjdsj4z0sf
Yes.
I have never had a corrupt DB with ECC memory, even with a few hard power cuts. I use RAID 1, though not with checksumming (mdadm) so about 50% of the time any issues should come up with disks if any.
and newer versions interoperate tooâŚ
Which browser tab is eating up 5 GB of RAM?!!!
nostr:npub12vkcxr0luzwp8e673v29eqjhrr7p9vqq8asav85swaepclllj09sylpugg. Basically every other day or so I kill the tab to free up the memory.
Can y'all limit your caching? I know nothing about browser-side caching, memory management, etc. But this is pretty ridiculous.
Use a client that actually cares about its users, like Coracle.
Hardware accelerated ChaCha20 đ¤
I wonder how many HWWs are developed with proper attention to security, from software to parts used :)
Most common one is cheaping out on SEs and buying one not meant for withstanding anything more than basic attacks. And âjust add shitâ firmware development
most boltcards are about as secure as magstripe, except it can be skimmed contactlessly