Avatar
TechPostsFromX
52d119f46298a8f7b08183b96d4e7ab54d6df0853303ad4a3c3941020f286129
Our relay: wss://nostr.cybercan.click I keep sharing posts from X about technology, software development, engineering. Feel free to suggest X accounts so I can add in the loop. This account is maintained by automation solutions developed by contact@webviniservices.com If you enjoy this page or some posts, I accept lightning donation. Thank you.

They call him king of the primitives

Source: x.com/mattpocockuk/status/1848069290907299994

Yeah, I'm migrating to this

Source: x.com/mattpocockuk/status/1848068749661794461

Implementation frameworks are canned bits of design optimized for a general case. When used in a specific case, they always add complexity because they handle eventualities that will never occur in your application. Unnecessary complexity is never a good thing.

Even worse, the frameworks' architectures often dominate the application. When you look at the code, what you see is the framework with intelligent warts hanging off of it. I want the inverse of that. At the highest level, I want to see the domain of the problem and the structure of the solution to that problem. I want the implementation details so well hidden that when I look at the top level, I don't see those details.

Finally, I, at least, almost always end up banging against something I need to do that the framework can't do. Crafting a workaround is always difficult and sometimes impossible. Frameworks are closed systems, often with zero extensibility or flexibility built in.

Of course, we want to leverage code and capabilities that others have written. That doesn't mean that we need an all-encompassing framework, however. For example, I'd much rather use a small stand-alone security library than a huge framework that happens to have a security aspect.

Source: x.com/allenholub/status/1848047153932910662

Driving a 2 ton car though busy downtown streets

have Spotify work more than 90% of the time

https://video.nostr.build/821d97d3c39361a57079e0e6bba0dc98c5a0aeefeb0be83e297e4b8fb1de83a3.mp4

Source: x.com/wesbos/status/1848011905320771888

The latest update makes the self driving much better. It was previously too hesitant. I’ve been cut off 3 times in 2 days and it handled it well. It also doesn’t need you to touch the wheel every 60 seconds if you are paying attention

Release notes say they deleted 300,000 lines of C++

Still kinda scary though

Source: x.com/wesbos/status/1847997006406385832

Deleted my last post: Tracefy called and asked to not post the current current city of my stolen e-bike just yet, as they don't want to tip off, if this is a gang.

This co has flown to another country from the Netherlands to recover my bike, thanks to the tracer coming online.

Source: x.com/GergelyOrosz/status/1845027026245165437

I scheduled this tweet 10 months ago and forgot about it lmao

Source: x.com/t3dotgg/status/1847955482511659466

Today marks 14 years since AngularJS was released. Feel old yet?

Source: x.com/t3dotgg/status/1847953407497097317

“QUICK PUT KAMALA IN CHARGE”

See how silly that sounds in proper real world context (see quote tweet)?

Don’t allow crafted hypothetical context to overwrite the truth.

(Taiwan is just the beginning…)

Source: x.com/Valuable/status/1847954264989069551

Sarcasm

Source: x.com/BLUECOW009/status/1848014461216465267

who wanna make a new javascript framework real quick to get into Y combinator

Source: x.com/BLUECOW009/status/1848014091819852096

Let Ω be the sample space of all possible outcomes let P(A) denote the probability of event A, define the set of all probabilities: S = {x | 0 ≤ x ≤ 1} and the set of all non-probabilities:

S' = (-∞, 0) ∪ (1, +∞)… for any event A:

P(A) ∈ S

1 - P(A) ∈ S

now if we know S', we can determine S, and thus all probabilities. By defining the set of all non-probabilities (S'), we effectively create a boundary for all valid probabilities. Any number not in S' must be a valid probability. This allows us to predict all probabilities by knowing what they cannot be. "A set of all non-probabilities" is correct because it provides a complete definition of what probabilities are not, thereby allowing us to deduce all valid probabilities…

Source: x.com/BLUECOW009/status/1847659104694673408

TLDR: hire me at least with a 3 months contract and I can make state of the art code.

Source: x.com/BLUECOW009/status/1847977887158108180

Source: x.com/BLUECOW009/status/1847980006376362040

I’m here writing state of the art code, thats it.

From the most revolutionary prompt ever to a new way to run quantum algorithms in classical computers. I meed time to make something that will change the world.

I’m look for visionaries that understand how valuable i am.

Source: x.com/BLUECOW009/status/1847978973889745204

Who can relate?

Source: x.com/denicmarko/status/1847939666336452787

Final Words: The best approach

➀ Start by developing a simple Front-End system.

➁ Build a Back-End without any Database.

➂ Integrate Front-End & Back-End.

➃ Create a Database.

➄ Modify Back-End to integrate with Database.

➅ Integrate Back-End with some External APIs.

Source: x.com/swapnakpanda/status/1847639463863681494

One annoying use of LLM tools like ChatGPT on social media:

Add a comment that summarises the original post.

Happens a lot on eg on LinkedIn.

This is what “noise” looks like. No value add, and no point of doing it: yet people still do.

Source: x.com/GergelyOrosz/status/1847916834466451675