Avatar
bitcoinlimit
55e343e6589073d312fcab30075e4b4681369b65459eff36a7e2fe4f880acd1b
dev @btcframe, running #bitcoin.

Bitcoin is still a currency and a form of money, not just an asset or digital property. That’s one of the misleading narratives saylor presents to the world, but imo this is incorrect. Bitcoin will continue to be used as money in many regions such as Africa and the Middle East. It will render many worthless currencies, like the Argentine Peso or Turkish Lira obsolete but the US Dollar will endure.

Some of you may dislike me for saying this, but #Bitcoin and the United States Dollar will coexist. The United States is the superpower of the world and the center of innovation, and it will continue to hold that position.

Undefined is not a function.

Ask him what the most valuable thing in his life is, then ask him to sell it, and he would—if he knew he would make a profit.

Replying to Avatar jack mallers

Another IPA lover, finally!

You know what? I actually liked the name "Freedom Tower" better than mine. 🧡

That's what the data indicates but remember, these are addresses not unique wallets. This doesn’t necessarily mean that all addresses are owned by different individuals. So I’d say the actual number is likely lower than 4 million.

This is definitely what I'll try to achieve. The best design approach for these kind of visualizations is a treemap but I'm already using it for the total global assets dashboard at btcframe.com, so I don't wanna repeat the same design pattern twice.

Yes, the design isn't finalized yet. Still pretty premature but it's challenging task to create the value property of each data node to determine the proportional size via JavaScript.

Working on a new dashboard: Bitcoin Wealth Distribution which visualizes the addresses by value held in fiat terms. The best part? I can actually get this data dynamically and update it every hour.

I’ll integrate this into @`BTC Frame` soon, and I’m calling it: "The Lighthouse of Freedom" 🌍⚡

Oh, I’m all about showing empathy, but not just towards one wealthy individual. There are plenty of relief funds out there, such as the Red Cross, California Fire Foundation, and California Community Foundation, that anyone can contribute to. IMO, sharing photos of friends' beachfront properties (whether owned or rented) while asking for donations feels wrong. This heartbreaking disaster has impacted so many lives. Why not focus on contributing to a general recovery fund that helps everyone in need, rather than prioritizing the preservation of one lavish lifestyle?

Of course, Natalie is popular on social media, so we all know many people will jump at the chance to show off their "empathy" not out of a genuine desire to help her, but to use this opportunity to gain attention or boost their own image. It’s disheartening to see such tragedies turned into a platform for performative acts rather than sincere efforts to make a meaningful difference for everyone and I mean everyone affected.