nostr:npub1excellx58e497gan6fcsdnseujkjm7ym5yp3m4rp0ud4j8ss39js2pn72a I would love to be able to use a pin pass to enter my nostr:npub1ajlrwgfj4yerhqf7ady03h7wmtk2qr3gs7h3sxcx83k05yld36sswpzx3q wallet.
Is this feature hidden, or maybe in development?
Relativity for the relatives 
I wouldn't call it an opportunity. It's more like a bet.
Human action at work, what is life without a little bit of risk if the potential reward is extremely large? Worth pissing away some cash maybe?
Any UTXO deserves to be bigger than its fee. The cardinality of ordinals shouldn't be trivial.
Having a coin by years end? 
To explain what Michael Saylor meant with the term "gold rush": There's a completely untouched arbitrage market for energy efficiency to be explored by #Bitcoin miners.
Don't tell anyone, but it's time to buy a donkey, a shovel, a pick and a pan.
Just pay to opt out of ads? 🤷♂️
The reason I dropped out of university at 24 was that I learned it had been teaching me how to become a cog.
Heatpump heatharvesting ASICs to mine #Bitcoin with the residual energy, and repeating that circularly is the actual renewable energy.
#Bitcoin Power law price modeling is like having a million dice roll 1000x and then picking the two dice that have almost the same pattern, claiming one is a model for the other.
Our current institutions aren't conspiring to oppress their citizens, they are executing a system error.
Law is no longer representing its subjects by prosecuting misconduct of responsibility by any reasonable margin. Therefore the misconduct is systemic.
That's why I think the issue of self custody is more significant now than ever, not historically normal at all.
I think it does. What money was for any given individual has changed from one generation to the next for all of history. What came after the Romans and their coins was a long period of barter and pillage, while most Roman citizens weren't well off because of self custody. They were well off compared to barbarians because of a holistic system of civilization, of which coinage was a major aspect.
Phenomenology is a deciding factor in human action. So are systemic differences. Poverty was a systemic phenomenon for the largest part of history. Poverty is akin to having nothing to take custody of. The only reason we're having this discussion is because we actually have something of value to take custody of. This is a generational phenomenon, because of the influences of innovation.
Complaining about human behavior isn't going to change zap culture, but understanding scale, ratio and motivation does help to picture where #Nostr will go.
"Why won't people zap?"
They do, and they will. But the current ecosystem is tiny, there is not enough bandwidth to support every potential financial incentive.
It's also unenforceable. Gresham's law will likely prove to be stronger than any measure the EU parliament can think of.
Humans tend to have a hard time conceiving of time as it is, let alone how much time and reality changes within a generation. If you're in your 30's, it's pretty much impossible for you to understand what it's like to be 75yo. Simply saying responsibility for personal wealth used to be normal, does not represent reality the way it really was perceived from the phenomenology of individuals. There was hardly any capital to go around for mostly everyone for pretty much the entirety of human history, and hardship was a bigger part of life than ever giving thought to the concept of sovereignty.
