On the wall at a hotel in Charleston and South Carolina
Recommended
Okan restaurant
Apparently it turns out that the stock market crashing is all biden's fault
Who knew?
Also if Amazon includes the cost of tariffs on different products in a transparent way that's apparently a political attack
Michael Saylor, as the CEO of MicroStrategy and a well-known Bitcoin advocate, would likely have a strong and critical perspective on the proposed change to Bitcoin’s protocol outlined in the social media post and GitHub pull request you provided. Based on his public statements and deep commitment to Bitcoin—both personally and through MicroStrategy’s significant investments—here’s what he might think about this situation.
Core Concerns: Preserving Bitcoin’s Value Proposition
Saylor has consistently championed Bitcoin as a store of value and a hedge against inflation, often likening it to "digital gold." Central to his belief is Bitcoin’s fixed supply of 21 million coins and its scarcity, which he sees as foundational to its worth. The social media post by Jason Hughes (
@wk057
) warns that Bitcoin Core developers are about to merge a change that could turn Bitcoin into a "worthless altcoin." This dramatic claim would almost certainly alarm Saylor, as any modification perceived as undermining Bitcoin’s core properties—its scarcity, security, or decentralized nature—would threaten its status and value proposition.
The specific change in question, detailed in GitHub pull request #32359 titled "Remove arbitrary limits on OP_RETURN (datacarri...)", involves altering a technical feature of Bitcoin. OP_RETURN is a mechanism that allows small amounts of data to be stored on the blockchain. Removing its limits could expand use cases, such as embedding more data, but it might also lead to blockchain bloat (increasing the size of the blockchain unnecessarily) or open the door to misuse, such as spamming the network. Saylor would likely view this as a risky move, potentially jeopardizing Bitcoin’s stability and security, which he considers non-negotiable.
A Call for Caution and Consensus
Saylor has often emphasized the need to protect Bitcoin’s core principles and resist changes that could destabilize the network. He would probably argue that any protocol change—like the one proposed—should be approached with extreme caution. The emotional tone of Hughes’ post, mentioning "lost sleep" and "clear community rejection," suggests a lack of broad support for the pull request. Saylor might seize on this, advocating for a transparent, community-driven discussion involving developers, miners, and users to thoroughly evaluate the change’s implications. He’d likely stress that Bitcoin’s strength lies in its consensus-driven governance, and pushing through a contentious update without widespread agreement could fracture the community and weaken trust in the network.
Balancing Evolution and Preservation
That said, Saylor isn’t inherently opposed to Bitcoin evolving. He’s acknowledged the importance of technological adaptability in ensuring Bitcoin’s longevity. If removing OP_RETURN limits could demonstrably enhance Bitcoin’s utility—without compromising its security or bloating the blockchain—he might be open to it. However, he’d demand rigorous evidence that the change aligns with Bitcoin’s fundamental ethos and doesn’t introduce unnecessary risks. Given the post’s dire framing and the lack of clear community backing, he’d likely lean toward skepticism, prioritizing preservation over experimentation in this case.
Saylor’s Likely Stance
In summary, Michael Saylor would probably oppose the proposed change to remove OP_RETURN limits, as described in the GitHub pull request, unless compelling evidence showed it wouldn’t harm Bitcoin’s core attributes. He’d express concern that such a modification could dilute Bitcoin’s value, stability, or decentralization—echoing Hughes’ fear of it becoming a "worthless altcoin." He might publicly call for:
Pausing the merge to allow for deeper analysis and debate.
Protecting Bitcoin’s long-term vision as a reliable, scarce asset.
Rallying the community to defend Bitcoin’s integrity against risky or poorly supported changes.
Saylor could use this moment to reinforce his bullish outlook on Bitcoin, framing it as a critical juncture to safeguard its future. If you’d like, I can look for any recent statements from him on similar topics to refine this further!
You can put this on your Samsung frame TV
Looks like Q2 Federal borrowing it's going to be over half a trillion
I would never make it to morning
I'm pretty sure I signed up for that 100 years ago and nothing ever came with it
I don't know what people mean when they say dooms scrolling
Do they mean that they're scrolling through things on Instagram and they're all depressing?
The algorithm gives you what you concentrate on, what you pay attention to, so all you have to do is focus on Happy stuff.
Here's a slightly modified version
Here is a free image for your Samsung frame TV , perfectly sized with the right aspect ratio and everything
If u like it, throw me some sats !!!
Open SmartThings.
Tap your Frame TV.
Tap Art Mode.
Tap + Add Your Photos.
Select your photo.
Crop or resize if needed.
Tap Set on Frame.
You will never be ready to have kids
Nobody's ever ready for it
If we waited until we were ready to do something the world would come to an end
Free crap for geezers
Interest on the debt
https://www.axios.com/2025/04/24/social-security-health-insurance-government-spending
