It is an attack on an enemy .govs "supply chain" "resources" etc. 😂

It's not attacking your own peasants & getting yourself offed for it...

That's what the civilians are, tax cattle the source for the .gov parasites, they can't exist without them. 🤣

Lol. There were still plenty of civilians.

That was an attack on an enemy .gov by attacking their tax cattle...

Have you never read about the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

You don't use WMDs to strike a handful of people & if you did you'd just create a whole lot more new enemies.

You don't use WMDs to strike a handful of people & if you did you'd just create a whole lot more new enemies.

You're wrong about everything, by the way. A government HAS to be sizable. That's not an option. Many of the recurring issues that we face are largely due to the people's unrelenting laziness and reluctance to take action against our leaders when corruption begins to become widespread. Which is what we're witnessing now, on a global scale. The first step that needs to be taken is a call for the riddance of WMDs. Everything you have suggested is impossible, as long as those exist. Although I doubt that will ever happen in our lifetime.

So you reckon that one is more secure than the Pixel would be🤔??

So you reckon that one is more secure than the Pixel would be🤔??

Who tried it? I considered having the limit include case law as well, but I haven't thought it through as well as I should since I am not in charge of anything.

Nope, no kill switches, you just have to trust that software is doing it & the chips aren't compromised.

Nope, no kill switches, you just have to trust that software is doing it & the chips aren't compromised.

I'm mulling over getting something similar. You can get a Google Pixel with Graphene OS so I'm assuming they're pretty similar bits of kit👍🏻.

It's priced in AUD so I'm assuming it is😜.

They already tried that, the lawyers ignored it...

Yes, but so is not having a state. We need to be able to iterate. Personally I'd like to try limiting the size of the corpus of law. The consistion should say something like all laws on the books must fit within 10kB zipped, and 100kB unzipped and be comprehensible to a median 10th grader.

That at least limits how invasive a government can be. You'd need some additional protections so the law can't be "we can do what we want."

There isn't, you have to remove them periodically & it isn't optional.

I don't really believe that there is a long-term method of forming a harmonizing relationship with the state. Every time we have, it has been short-lived and always ends up imploding on itself. Bitcoin may play a role in ridding ourselves of the state... or at least assist in the formation of a completely new one. Also, why should we help them? I see no reason to do so. They lie to us regarding their ideals from the very beginning.

I'm not buying any of that Aussie rubbish😬😜.