My protocol would be proof of ownership, in 3 layers and 2 fingerprints, like multi sig. Based on PoW to generate a pixilated block of data on layer 1 where the artist posts their original copy with both fingerprints hashed, a negative of the pixelated AI data on layer 2 for cloning purposes with the physical fingerprint hashed, and layer 3 to provide public keys purchasable by the public.
To bad it's PoO though, haha.
Unfortunately, it will lead to digital IDs and digital property IDs, unless those artists have the tools to digitize themselves.
Maybe someone could create an artist's property chain, where the hash of their selected AI's fingerprint is used to create a key, such that viewing her or the AI requires her permission. As with adding her likeness to movies or television, you need two fingerprints, AI and physical, multi-sig. The fingerprints would be added to anything she produces and hashed. So even Google images would need to validate pixels on an image with her likeness for fingerprints and verify with her that she allows the real or AI version to appear. She holds the encrypted negatives, like old film rolls, that can only be read with a valid public key, like a light source. Like the negative could appear before she sends the public key, I think that makes sense.
I'm just spit balling and drinking, watching the office.
So she can work from home then or even not at all.
Well that can take time too.
There is one more choice, dare I say, leap of faith. I don't care for the word faith but it applies in the sense of making choices.
He's a businessman, so they do things that are profitable, usually to their benefit first.
Why stop at p2p payments? Add the most popular and quickest relays behind pay walls, then add ads to the free or cheaper relays.
If it gets too big or too profitable the governments' acronyms, abbreviations, and initialisms show up.
I've seen it happen many times before.
Well I'll spell it out, in my opinion of course.
I want to create something better than Twitter today but I created Twitter decades ago and so much has changed since then. All I know is Twitter but I know it could be better. A technology now exists that creates an exciting opportunity to monetize services in a p2p way that makes regulation and capture extremely difficult, while maintaining anonymity and security. I don't know that part well but I am rich. What is the cheapest way to get young developers interested in creating an IRC like protocol, exploiting cryptographic IDs, and creating multiple apps providing UX/UI across multiple OS's? What happens when enough people navigate to the most popular or quickest app?
He seems like a nice guy but low hanging fruit is usually grabbed first. Why else sell Twitter to an emerald mine beneficiary?
Just my opinion, be watchful and mindful. Things that are too good are usually made worse.
Jack is hedging his bets.
On an unrelated note, have you ever gotten rug burn on your knees or elbows? There is a smell to it, especially when the rug is pulled really fast.
Do both so you'll remember for next time.
I'm not in Canada, but yeah Trudeau bent you all over a barrel. But he is probably Castro's son so I guess you get what you get.
She stood there for 10 minutes, barefoot, while he drew her feet in a coffee shop? Sus
Traffic jam implies things stop, tick tock next block. Working as intended.
I was going to say that too, haha.
You do realize it costs actual bitcoin to create brc20, right? So what you have here are retards spending a hard money to write pictures to the Bitcoin Blockchain. Zap me some brc20 bro.
That transaction is definitely irreversible.
Sounds like you need lightning. It cost me $3 dollars to send 1 bitcoin on layer one, and nothing to send 100,000 sats on lightning. Good luck.
So you mean bitcoin is circular, not the people using it. I can see that.
Do you have a TLDR version?
