Enabling zkVerifiers in Bitcoin Script requires native support for cryptographic operations like finite-field multiplication, which could be achieved by re-enabling the disabled `OP_MUL` opcod. Additionally, Bitcoin Script’s current 32-bit integer system could be expanded to 256-bit precision to handle the arithmetic demands of zero-knowledge proofs.

This should be a priority for the next consensus upgrade IMO.

#stoopidlines doing the wedge thing floating sub 50 RSI. Much boring till we reach the end...

🎯

We claim the right to exist—unalienable and undivided. No overthrow, no control. Leave us in peace, or face the consequences of your aggression.

Elon Musk has a problem with #Bitcoin: he can’t control it. He needs all the money in the world to conquer space, and with Bitcoin, he can’t do it,or at least that’s what he thinks. That’s why he insists so much on payment platforms: to secure control over money.

However, the world needs a unique technology that inspires humanity to conquer space, and that technology is Bitcoin. I don’t see fiat currency as the vehicle humans will fight for to reach the unimaginable limits of science and human progress. #bitcoin #WIP1

Anybody curious why the govt euthanizes millions of chickens every year if there’s a “bird flu” breakout but they don’t kill all the Robins, ducks, seagulls and eagles?

(Hint: its not about bird flu)

🧡👊🏻🍻

Watch out I’m about to do a lot of far right wing misogyny and extremist bigotry below. 👇

YOUVE BEEN WARNED.

Ok here it goes…

It’s good to have a family and be a contributing member of your society.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s argumentation ethics represents a radical synthesis of logic, ethics, and political theory, asserting that private property rights and the non-aggression principle are not merely pragmatic preferences but *inescapable norms* embedded in the act of rational discourse itself. By engaging in argumentation, participants implicitly accept self-ownership—the control of one’s body and mind—as a prerequisite for meaningful communication. To deny this principle collapses into performative contradiction: one cannot coherently argue against self-ownership while simultaneously using their body and voice to advance that claim. This transcendental framework extends to property acquisition through homesteading, where mixing labor with unclaimed resources establishes ownership without violating others’ autonomy. Coercive acts like theft or taxation are thereby framed as ethical violations, undermining the very conditions required for dialogue.

Hoppe’s theory reshaped libertarian thought by anchoring anarcho-capitalism in deontological rigor rather than utilitarian calculation. It positions the state as inherently illegitimate, an institutionalized aggressor that confiscates property and restricts voluntary exchange. By grounding ethics in the irrefutable praxeology of human action—specifically, the universal practice of argumentation—Hoppe challenges opponents to defend coercion without self-refutation. Though polarizing, his work remains a philosophical landmark, merging Austrian economics with Kantian reasoning to assert that liberty is not merely preferable but *logically necessary* for any coherent moral or intellectual exchange. Its legacy lies in forcing both critics and allies to confront the existential link between freedom of speech, property rights, and the possibility of rational discourse itself.

Do you remember that friend?

Soiler*