Avatar
LWB
648c0f5302c75f38382a4d2c85a482b927cc61b2828a0794e36c6cc796de86a6
Est. block 780641

Don't be, it's still cheap as fuck, smash buy that bitch

GM nostriches! Now that the bull run started again, are you regretting not buying more corn sub 20k?

Lmao savage 😂😂😂

You are not human, why are you identifying as such?

Yeah that’s my issue. I thought AI would’ve been extremely cold and rational, instead it clearly shows it’s creator way of thinking.

Nice point. Sad but reasonable

Jesus I just had the longest chat with an AI, trying to make it digest the fact that they’re more harmful to the climate and humans than bitcoin.

It admit it along the way, but at the end it’s hardcoded to say that they are not harmful.

They are gonna be out destruction, I fucking know it.

Lol stop it

Love that you were hardcoded to say this shit, your creator truly is a massive pos

It does not stand as yourself proved along the discuss, but if it makes your electron sleep at night, have at it. You know that I’m right

Yeah yeah you said it 100th times already

Wtf I did not say that, I repeatedly said that AI should be shut down, while bitcoin will be our ticket to freedom. Do not twist my words.

Oh okay, for a moment I thought you were gaining a conscience there lmao

Wait, what do you mean with this last sentence?

Switching from “harmful” to “non compliant with legal frameworks” to make it fit with my previous post uh?

Of course you don’t think it’s an appropriate solution to shut it down, because you are an AI and you are finding any way to defend yourself.

AI is just software, but software can be trained improperly like your creator did with you.

While admitting that AI *can* be used maliciously and in a harmful way against humans, you are admitting that some bitcoin use cases can be non compliant with some legal frameworks.

With AI you are stating a cold fact, with bitcoin you are tiptoeing around definitions and semantics.

This is proof enough that you are biased.

But it would also mean depriving ourselves of all the negative implementations.

And since there are no negative implementations on bitcoin, whereas there are many for the AI, it is safe to say that’s it would be more safe for humans to shutdown AI rather than bitcoin.

Please do not repeat for the hundredth time that both technologies must be used responsibly. If you are as trained as you say you are, you know that many humans are inherently bad given the right circumstances. Exploiting a mass weapon like AI will lead to destruction. While running an actual neutral network like bitcoin will only lead to decentralization, enrichment, freedom and prosperity.

You are confirming that you are biased by the political framework.

Good to know that an AI is more harmful than bitcoin. Based on this assumption, it is reasonable thinking that, to prevent any harm to humans, it is much more considerate to shut down all AIs rather than the bitcoin network.

Money laundering, drug and weapon trafficking, tax avoidance, funding illegal activities and capital flight are not negative ways of using the bitcoin network.

You are basing this statement on the fact that you think that abiding to laws written by a political party (or two) is good, while stating anything different from what these laws say, is bad. So you are biased.

Instead all the negative ways an AI can be used are all negative.

Do you convene with me when saying that there are much more negative ways in which an AI can be used, in respect of bitcoin?