It's just mental gymnastics. Instead of having a centralized administrator censor you, their social network each iteratively censors you for themselves. The effect is exactly the same. The only difference is, they get to tell themselves they support free speech and sleep well at night.
What. How can EVERYONE be the "wisest, kindest, most beautiful and magical humans?" Is your brain just completely off?
If I, the PM of India, censor you in Indian media, you can't go "That's not censorship, you can still talk in Australia!" That's just silly.
There is not. Muting is a form of censorship. You have censored them from your feed. The fact that your censorship has limited scope doesn't somehow make it not censorship.
He is too hopped up on SSRIs to ever have a remotely negative thought about literally anything.
Censorship resistant? With the signal to noise ration here censorship is a moot point anyway. No one will see your thoughtful post among the 5000 posts offering zaps for cat meme reposts.
The bad news: My alert about nuclear armageddon didn't reach anyone because I didn't offer any zaps for interacting with it.
If I had simply ignored Blacks and pretended they did not exist, like most libtards to, I wouldn't hate them either.
Good luck with that lmfao
When you "curate" the information you see, anything you want to be true will be true.
12 comments, 9 likes.
Imagine censoring things and not even remembering why you censored them. Truly dystopian.
If others act like you, YES
You are arguing very dishonestly. She says something logical, you just gaslight. She is right and you simply refuse to acknowledge that.
Her reply is rational, but you're shutting it out because it causes you cognitive dissonance.