No, retard, it's not. You have plenty of censorship tools at your disposal.

Kill all androids, Butlerian Jihad NOW

Simp.

Libertarians are braindead and deserve gas chambers.

>who all agree that we need to have fewer rules

No you don't. You think all of you should be able to make rules and impost them on others. You all have censor's markers now.

You didn't hate centralized censorship you just envied it.

You do all of those things for zaps and social credit.

If Russians put "This machine kills troons" on their munitions this dude would throw a shitfit and call them genocidal totalitarians.

Simp.

There is literally no reason to share your personal life with the internet except to commodify it and dehumanize yourself as a product to be bought and sold for currency and social approval.

We still have to coexist with people who use them and the dynamics it creates. The libertarian live and let live ethos simply does not work.

Simp.

Try killing yourself that might help.

Lots wrong with it actually.

"Just shut out anything you don't like" is the ideology of a 6 year old.

>Are you advocating that we should, by force, listen to everyone who tries to talk with us?

By moral obligation, yes.

>(freedom from anyone doing anything to you that you don't welcome)

Not something you have any right to.

Any right is a limitation of freedoms. All rights are "You are not free to fuck with [my thing." In this case, it's my speech.

No one WANTS to be harshly criticized.

That's why you should not be able to opt out.

Mine isn't a commodity, I give it freely.

> I’m censoring him, even though he is still here today saying his bullshit.

I have seen MANY of you people saying some variation of "Just ignore him and he will leave."

So you clearly are trying to manipulate me into leaving and being silent.

You commodify your attention, that's whoring.